TradingView
wsbza
14 Ogs 2017 pukul 10.55

possible wave count 

GERMAN STOCK INDEX (DAX)TVC

Huraian

Initial wave (a) done?

Komen

not much of change so far

Komen

triangle (b) or zigzag (b) with a triangle b

Komen

Fibo 50% or 61.8% re-tracement may defend short-term bulls

Komen

close to a trend reversal ?

Komen

previous alter count won

Komen

bearish assumption

Komen

expanded flat still possible

Komen

Komen

Komen

it seems wave (b) has some unfinished business

Komen

triangle x or flat b ?

Komen

could be another c of (b) up

Komen

could be a complex (b) wave

Komen

the short-term decline is getting sharper, maybe wave (b) or (ii) is done

Komen

the short-term picture is not very clear, could be more sideways

Komen

well, if this is truly a bearish structure, we should see lower degree consolidations that may allow us to join with bears

Komen

Komen

still expecting wave (c) decline

Komen

The triangle (b) wave is no longer valid as DAX made a new high today
This left us with 3 possible scenarios:
- Expanded Flat wave 4
- Running Triangle wave 4
- Extended wave 3

Komen

bearish flag short set up

Komen

Komen

Komen

green wave {C} is about 2 times the length of green wave {A}, probably a good time to take the profit

Komen

potential (i)-(ii)-i-ii count
Komen
J0seLu1s
Hi, Do you think it's gonna go down 12844 before go up till 13265??
wsbza
@J0seLu1s, to be honest I do not know, there are number of different counts, ideally I would prefer to see more sideways corrective pattern before another sell off starts. if my abc flat =(w) then another (x) wave could either break w wave low or not, then make another abc for Y or abcde for Y. If my count was wrong, say my pink c is actually only the start of the correction, we could have c=a', if wave a'=5 i would not expect it have deep wave b' but if internal of wave a'=3 it is more likely to see a deep retracement
J0seLu1s
@wsbza, Thx so much.
wsbza
@J0seLu1s, Assume the initial decline(i to v within the white channel) is wave (i) or (a), if the subsequent decline is sharper than wave (i), then maybe my a-b-c is wave(ii)
J0seLu1s
@wsbza, yep, thats the same I was thinking the same right now, lets see what happen. Keep up the great work.
Walentine
wsbza
@Walentine, looks like your count is more accurate
Lebih