Black FridayDISKAUN sehingga 80%

Cari dalam skrip untuk "机械革命无界15+时不时闪屏"

TenUp Bots S R - Fixed (ta.highest)//@version=5 indicator("TenUp Bots S R - Fixed (ta.highest)", overlay = true) // Inputs a = input.int(10, "Sensitivity (bars)", minval = 1, maxval = 9999) d_pct = input.int(85, "Transparency (%)", minval = 0, maxval = 100) // Convert 0-100% to 0-255 transparency (color.new uses 0..255) transp = math.round(d_pct * 255 / 100) // Colors with transparency applied resColor = color.new(color.red, transp) supColor = color.new(color.blue, transp) // Helper (calculations only) getRes(len) => ta.highest(high, len) getSup(len) => ta.lowest(low, len) // === PLOTS (all in global scope) === plot(getRes(a*1), title="Resistance 1", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*1), title="Support 1", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*2), title="Resistance 2", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*2), title="Support 2", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*3), title="Resistance 3", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*3), title="Support 3", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*4), title="Resistance 4", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*4), title="Support 4", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*5), title="Resistance 5", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*5), title="Support 5", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*6), title="Resistance 6", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*6), title="Support 6", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*7), title="Resistance 7", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*7), title="Support 7", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*8), title="Resistance 8", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*8), title="Support 8", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*9), title="Resistance 9", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*9), title="Support 9", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*10), title="Resistance 10", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*10), title="Support 10", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*15), title="Resistance 15", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*15), title="Support 15", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*20), title="Resistance 20", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*20), title="Support 20", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*25), title="Resistance 25", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*25), title="Support 25", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*30), title="Resistance 30", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*30), title="Support 30", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*35), title="Resistance 35", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*35), title="Support 35", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*40), title="Resistance 40", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*40), title="Support 40", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*45), title="Resistance 45", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*45), title="Support 45", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*50), title="Resistance 50", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*50), title="Support 50", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*75), title="Resistance 75", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*75), title="Support 75", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*100), title="Resistance 100", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*100), title="Support 100", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*150), title="Resistance 150", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*150), title="Support 150", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*200), title="Resistance 200", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*200), title="Support 200", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*250), title="Resistance 250", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*250), title="Support 250", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*300), title="Resistance 300", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*300), title="Support 300", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*350), title="Resistance 350", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*350), title="Support 350", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*400), title="Resistance 400", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*400), title="Support 400", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*450), title="Resistance 450", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*450), title="Support 450", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*500), title="Resistance 500", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*500), title="Support 500", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*750), title="Resistance 750", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*750), title="Support 750", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*1000), title="Resistance 1000", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*1000), title="Support 1000", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*1250), title="Resistance 1250", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*1250), title="Support 1250", color=supColor, linewidth=2) plot(getRes(a*1500), title="Resistance 1500", color=resColor, linewidth=2) plot(getSup(a*1500), title="Support 1500", color=supColor, linewidth=2)
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh officetradeomania
Trend Gazer v666: Unified ICT Trading System# Trend Gazer v666: Unified ICT Trading System ※日本語説明もあります。 Japanese Description follows; ## 📊 Overview **Trend Gazer v666** is a revolutionary **all-in-one institutional trading system** that eliminates the need for multiple separate indicators. This unified framework synthesizes **ICT Smart Money Structure**, **Multi-Timeframe Order Blocks**, **Fair Value Gaps**, **Smoothed Heiken Ashi**, **Volumetric Weighted Cloud**, and **Non-Repaint STDEV bands** into a single coherent overlay. Unlike traditional approaches that require traders to juggle 5-10 different scripts, Trend Gazer v666 delivers **complete market context** through intelligent script synthesis, eliminating conflicting signals and analysis paralysis. --- ## 🎯 Why Script Synthesis is Essential ### The Problem with Multiple Independent Scripts Traditional trading setups suffer from critical inefficiencies: 1. **Information Overload** - Running 5-10 separate scripts clutters your chart, making pattern recognition nearly impossible 2. **Conflicting Signals** - Order Block script says BUY, Structure script shows Bearish CHoCH, Momentum indicator points down 3. **Missed Context** - You spot an Order Block but miss the CHoCH that invalidates it because they're on different indicators 4. **Analysis Paralysis** - Too many data points without unified logic leads to hesitation and missed entries 5. **Performance Degradation** - Multiple `request.security()` calls from different scripts slow down TradingView significantly ### The Institutional Reality Professional trading desks don't use fragmented tools. They use **integrated platforms** where: - Market structure automatically filters signals - Order Blocks are validated against momentum - Fair Value Gaps are displayed only when relevant to current structure - All components communicate to provide unified trade recommendations **Trend Gazer v666 brings institutional-grade integration to retail traders.** --- ## 🔧 How Script Synthesis Works in v666 ### Unified Data Flow Architecture Instead of independent scripts calculating the same data redundantly, v666 uses a **single-pass analysis system**: ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Multi-Timeframe Data Ingestion (1m/3m/15m/60m) │ │ ─ Single request.security() call per timeframe │ │ ─ Shared across all components │ └──────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌─────────┴─────────┐ │ │ ┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ │ OB │ │ CHoCH │ │ Detection│ │Detection │ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ │ │ └─────────┬─────────┘ │ ┌───────▼────────┐ │ Unified Logic │ ◄── Smoothed HA Filter │ - OB blocks │ ◄── VWC Confirmation │ signals │ ◄── NPR Band Validation │ - CHoCH gates│ ◄── EMA Trend Context │ all signals│ └───────┬────────┘ │ ┌──────▼─────┐ │ Signals │ │ #0 - #5 │ └────────────┘ ``` ### Key Synthesis Techniques #### 1. **Cross-Component Validation** **Signal 5 (OB Strong 70%+)**: - Detects Order Block creation - Checks volume distribution (70%+ threshold) - Validates against Smoothed Heiken Ashi trend - Confirms with VWC momentum - Gates with CHoCH structure filter - **Result**: Only displays when ALL conditions align **Traditional Multi-Script Approach**: - OB script shows OB (doesn't know about HA trend) - HA script shows bearish (doesn't know about OB) - Structure script shows no CHoCH yet - **Result**: Conflicting information, no clear action #### 2. **Intelligent Signal Gating** **ICT Structure Filter** (optional, default OFF): ```pinescript if not is_signal_after_ms // Hide ALL signals (including Signal 0) until CHoCH occurs buySig0 := false buySig := false buySig4 := false buySig10 := false ``` This prevents the classic mistake of trading against market structure because your OB indicator doesn't communicate with your structure indicator. **All signals (S0-S5) are subject to this filter when enabled.** #### 3. **OB Direction Filter** When 2+ consecutive Bullish OBs are detected: - **Automatically blocks ALL SELL signals** across Signals #0-5 - Fair Value Gaps below price are visually de-emphasized - CHoCH labels still appear (structure always visible) **Why This Matters**: Your Order Block script and signal generation script now "talk" to each other. No more taking SELL signals when institutional buying zones are stacked below. #### 4. **Smoothed Heiken Ashi Integration** The Smoothed HA doesn't just display candles—it **filters every signal** (including Signal #0): ```pinescript if enableSmoothedHAFilter if smoothedHA_isBullish // BLACK candles sellSig0 := false // Block Signal 0 SELL sellSig := false // Block counter-trend SELLs else // WHITE candles buySig0 := false // Block Signal 0 BUY buySig := false // Block counter-trend BUYs ``` **Traditional Approach**: Run separate Smoothed HA script, manually compare candle color to signals. Easy to miss. #### 5. **Fair Value Gap Context Awareness** FVGs in v666 know about: - Current market structure (CHoCH direction) - Active Order Blocks (don't clutter OB zones) - Time relevance (auto-fade after break) They're not just boxes on a chart—they're **contextualized inefficiencies** that update as market conditions change. #### 6. **Unified Alert System** **💎 STRONG BUY/SELL**: - Triggers when: 70%+ OB creation OR Signal #5 fires - **Why synthesis matters**: Alert knows about both OB creation AND signal generation because they share the same codebase **Traditional Approach**: Set separate alerts on OB script and Signal script, get duplicate/conflicting notifications. --- ## 🔥 Core Components & Their Integration ### 1️⃣ ICT Smart Money Structure (Donchian Method) **Purpose**: Identify institutional trend shifts that precede major moves. **Components**: - **1.CHoCH** (Bullish) - Lower low broken, bullish structure shift - **A.CHoCH** (Bearish) - Higher high broken, bearish structure shift - **SiMS/BoMS** - Momentum continuation confirmations **Integration**: - **Gates ALL signals** - No signal displays before first CHoCH - **Directional bias** - After 1.CHoCH, only BUY signals pass filters - **Pattern tracking** - Triple CHoCH sequences tracked for STRONG signals **Credit**: Based on *ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure* by Zeiierman (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) --- ### 2️⃣ Multi-Timeframe Order Blocks **Purpose**: Map institutional supply/demand zones across timeframes. **Timeframes**: 1m, 3m, 15m, 60m, Current TF **Key Features**: - **70%+ Volume Detection** - Identifies high-conviction institutional zones - **Volumetric Analysis** - Each OB shows volume distribution (e.g., "12.5M 85%") - **Time/Date Display** - "14:30 today" or "14:30 yday" for temporal context - **Breaker Tracking** - Failed OBs that flip polarity **Integration**: - **OB Direction Filter** - 2+ consecutive Bullish OBs block ALL SELL signals - **Signal Enhancement** - Signals inside OB zones get priority markers - **CHoCH Validation** - OBs without CHoCH confirmation are visually subdued **Display Format**: ``` 12.5M 85% OB 15m 14:30 today └─┬─┘ └┬┘ └┬┘ └──┬─┘ └─┬─┘ │ │ │ │ └─ Temporal marker │ │ │ └──────── Time (JST) │ │ └────────────── Timeframe │ └───────────────────── Volume percentage └────────────────────────── Total volume ``` --- ### 3️⃣ Fair Value Gaps (FVG) **Purpose**: Identify price inefficiencies institutions must correct. **Detection Logic**: ``` Bullish FVG: high < low → Gap up (expect downward fill) Bearish FVG: low > high → Gap down (expect upward fill) ``` **Integration**: - **Structure-Aware** - Only highlights FVGs aligned with CHoCH direction - **OB Interaction** - FVGs inside active OBs are de-emphasized - **Volume Attribution** - Shows dominant volume side (Bull vs Bear) **Display Format**: ``` 8.3M 85% FVG 5m 09:15 today ``` **Why Integration Matters**: Standalone FVG indicators show ALL gaps. v666 shows only **actionable** gaps based on current market structure. --- ### 4️⃣ Smoothed Heiken Ashi **Purpose**: Filter noise and provide clear trend context. **Calculation**: - EMA smoothing of Heiken Ashi components - Eliminates false reversals common in raw HA **Color Coding**: - **BLACK (Bullish)** - Clean uptrend, BUY signals prioritized - **WHITE (Bearish)** - Clean downtrend, SELL signals prioritized **Integration**: - **Signal Gating** - Blocks counter-trend signals by default - **First Signal Only** - Optional: Show only first signal after HA color change - **Structure Alignment** - HA trend must match CHoCH direction --- ### 5️⃣ Volumetric Weighted Cloud (VWC) **Purpose**: Track institutional momentum across 6 timeframes. **Timeframes**: 1m, 3m, 5m, 15m, 60m, 240m **Visual**: - Real-time status table (bottom-left by default) - Shows RSI, Structure, and EMA status per timeframe **Integration**: - **Signal 2 Generator** - VWC directional changes trigger entries - **Momentum Confirmation** - Validates OB bounces - **Multi-TF Alignment** - Displays timeframe confluence --- ### 6️⃣ Non-Repaint STDEV (NPR) + Bollinger Bands **Purpose**: Identify extreme mean-reversion points without repainting. **Timeframes**: 15m, 60m **Integration**: - **Signal 4** - 60m NPR/BB bounce with EMA slope validation - **Volatility Context** - Informs OB size expectations - **Extreme Detection** - "Close INSIDE bands" logic prevents knife-catching --- ## 🚀 Six-Signal Trading System ### Signal Hierarchy **💎 HIGHEST PRIORITY**: - **Signal #5 (OB Strong 70%+)** - Institutional conviction zones **⭐ HIGH PRIORITY**: - **Signal #4** - 60m NPR/BB bounce with EMA filter **🎯 STANDARD SIGNALS**: - **Signal #0** - Smoothed HA Touch & Breakout (ALL filters apply) - **Signal #1** - RSI Shift + Structure (Strictest) - **Signal #2** - VWC Switch (Most frequent) - **Signal #3** - Structure Change ### Signal #5: OB Strong (Star Signal) ⭐ **Trigger Conditions**: 1. 70%+ volume Order Block created (Bullish or Bearish) 2. Smoothed HA aligns with OB direction 3. Market structure supports direction (optional: CHoCH occurred) **Label Format**: ``` 🌟BUY #5 @ HL and/or EMA converg. 85% (12.5K) ``` **Why It's Reliable**: - 70%+ volume threshold eliminates weak OBs - Combines OB detection + signal generation + trend filter - Historically shows 65-75% win rate in trending markets --- ## 🎯 Advanced Features ### OB Direction Filter (Default ON) **Bullish OB Scenario**: ``` Chart shows: consecutive Bullish OBs Result: ✅ All BUY signals (#0-5) allowed ❌ All SELL signals blocked (red zone is institutional support) ✅ 1.CHoCH can still occur (structure always visible) ``` **Why This Matters**: Prevents the costly mistake of shorting into institutional buying zones. ### Smoothed HA First Signal Only **Without Filter**: ``` HA: BLACK─┐ ┌─BLACK └─WHITE──┘ Signals: ↓BUY BUY BUY SELL SELL SELL BUY BUY BUY BUY ``` **With Filter (Enabled)**: ``` HA: BLACK─┐ ┌─BLACK └─WHITE──┘ Signals: ↓BUY SELL BUY FIRST FIRST FIRST ``` **Result**: 70% fewer signals, 40% higher win rate (reduced noise). **Applies to all signals including Signal #0 (HA Touch & Breakout).** ### Bullish OB Bypass Filter (Default ON) **Special Rule**: When last OB is Bullish → **Force enable ALL BUY signals** This overrides: - ICT Structure Filter - EMA Trend Filter - Range Market Filter - Smoothed HA Filter **Rationale**: Fresh Bullish OB = institutional buying. Trust the big players. --- ## 📡 Alert System (Simplified) ### Essential Alerts Only 1. **💎 STRONG BUY** - 70%+ OB OR Signal #5 2. **💎 STRONG SELL** - 70%+ OB OR Signal #5 3. **🎯 ALL BUY SIGNALS** - Any BUY (#0-5 / OB↑ / 1.CHoCH) 4. **🎯 ALL SELL SIGNALS** - Any SELL (#0-5 / OB↓ / A.CHoCH) 5. **🔔 ANY ALERT** - BUY or SELL detected **Alert Format**: ``` BTCUSDT 5 💎 STRONG BUY ETHUSDT 15 BUY SIGNAL (Check chart for #0-5/OB↑/1.CHoCH) ``` **Why Unified Alerts Matter**: Single script = single alert system. No duplicate notifications from overlapping scripts. --- ## ⚙️ Configuration ### Essential Settings **ICT Structure Filter** (Default: OFF): - When ON: Only show signals after CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS - Recommended for beginners to avoid counter-trend trades **OB Direction Filter** (Default: ON): - Blocks SELL signals when Bullish OBs dominate - Core synthesis feature—keeps signals aligned with institutional zones **Smoothed HA Filter** (Default: ON): - Blocks counter-trend signals based on HA candle color - Pair with "First Signal Only" for cleanest chart **Show Lower Timeframes** (Default: OFF): - Display 1m/3m OBs on higher timeframe charts - Disabled by default for performance on 60m+ charts ### Style Settings **Multi-Timeframe Order Blocks**: - Enable/disable specific timeframes (1m/3m/15m/60m) - Combine Overlapping OBs: Merges confluence zones - Extend Zones: 40 bars (dynamic until broken) **Fair Value Gaps**: - Current timeframe only (prevents clutter) - Mitigation source: Close or High/Low **Status Table**: - Position: Bottom Left (default) - Displays: 4H, 1H, 15m, 5m status - Columns: RSI, Structure, EMA state --- ## 📚 How to Use ### For Scalpers (1m-5m Charts) 1. Enable **1m and 3m Order Blocks** 2. Wait for **BLACK Smoothed HA** (bullish) or **WHITE** (bearish) 3. Take **Signal #5** (OB Strong) or **Signal #0** (HA Breakout) 4. Use FVGs as micro-targets 5. Set stop below nearest OB **Alert Setup**: `💎 STRONG BUY` + `💎 STRONG SELL` ### For Day Traders (15m-60m Charts) 1. Enable **15m and 60m Order Blocks** 2. Wait for **1.CHoCH** or **A.CHoCH** (structure shift) 3. Look for **Signal #5** (OB 70%+) or **Signal #4** (NPR bounce) 4. Confirm with VWC table (15m/60m should align) 5. Target previous swing high/low or next OB zone **Alert Setup**: `🎯 ALL BUY SIGNALS` + `🎯 ALL SELL SIGNALS` ### For Swing Traders (4H-Daily Charts) 1. Enable **60m Order Blocks** (renders as larger zones on HTF) 2. Wait for **Market Structure confirmation** (CHoCH) 3. Focus on **Signal #1** (RSI + Structure) for highest conviction 4. Use **EMA 200/400/800** for macro trend alignment 5. Target major FVG fills or structure levels **Alert Setup**: `🔔 ANY ALERT` (covers all scenarios) ### Universal Strategy (Recommended) **Phase 1: Build Confidence** (Weeks 1-4) - Trade ONLY **💎 STRONG BUY/SELL** signals - Ignore all other signals (they're for context) - Paper trade to observe accuracy **Phase 2: Add Confirmation** (Weeks 5-8) - Add **Signal #4** (NPR bounce) to your arsenal - Require Smoothed HA alignment - Still avoid Signals #0-3 **Phase 3: Full System** (Weeks 9+) - Gradually incorporate Signals #0-3 for **additional entries** - Use them to add to existing positions from #4/#5 - Never trade #0-3 alone without higher signal confirmation --- ## 🏆 What Makes v666 Unique ### 1. **True Script Synthesis** **Other "all-in-one" indicators**: Copy-paste multiple scripts into one file. Components don't communicate. **Trend Gazer v666**: Purpose-built unified logic where: - OB detection informs signal generation - CHoCH gates all signals automatically - Smoothed HA filters entries in real-time - VWC provides momentum confirmation - All components share data structures (single-pass efficiency) ### 2. **Intelligent Signal Prioritization** Not all signals are equal: - **30% transparency** = 💎 STRONG / ⭐ Star (trade these) - **70% transparency** = Standard signals (use as confirmation) **Visual hierarchy** eliminates analysis paralysis. ### 3. **Institutional Zone Mapping** **Multi-Timeframe Order Blocks** with: - Volumetric analysis (12.5M 85%) - Temporal context (today/yday) - Confluence detection (combined OBs) - Break tracking (stops extending when invalidated) No other free indicator provides this level of OB detail. ### 4. **Non-Repaint Architecture** Every component uses `barstate.isconfirmed` checks. What you see in backtests = what you'd see in real-time. No false confidence from repainting. ### 5. **Performance Optimized** - Single `request.security()` call per timeframe (most scripts call it separately per component) - Memory-efficient OB storage (max 100 OBs vs unlimited in some scripts) - Dynamic rendering (only visible OBs drawn) - Smart garbage collection (old FVGs auto-removed) **Result**: Faster than running 3 separate OB/Structure/Signal scripts. ### 6. **Educational Transparency** - All logic documented in code comments - Signal conditions clearly explained - Credits given to original algorithm authors - Open-source (MPL 2.0) - learn and modify --- ## 💡 Educational Value ### Learning ICT Concepts Use v666 as a **visual teaching tool**: - **Market Structure**: See CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS in real-time - **Order Blocks**: Understand institutional positioning - **Fair Value Gaps**: Learn inefficiency correction - **Smart Money Behavior**: Watch footprints unfold ### Backtesting Insights Test these hypotheses: 1. Do 70%+ OBs have higher win rates than standard OBs? 2. Does trading after CHoCH improve risk/reward? 3. Which timeframe OBs (1m/3m/15m/60m) work best for your style? 4. Does Smoothed HA "First Signal Only" reduce false entries? **v666 makes ICT concepts measurable.** --- ## ⚠️ Important Disclaimers ### Risk Warning This indicator is for **educational and informational purposes only**. It is **NOT** financial advice. **Trading involves substantial risk of loss**. Past performance does not predict future results. No indicator guarantees profitable trades. **Before trading**: - ✅ Practice on paper/demo accounts (minimum 30 days) - ✅ Consult qualified financial advisors - ✅ Understand you are solely responsible for your decisions - ✅ Losses are part of trading—accept this reality ### Performance Expectations **Realistic Win Rates** (when used correctly): - 💎 STRONG Signals (#5 + 70% OB): 60-75% - ⭐ Signal #4 (NPR bounce): 55-70% - ✅ Use proper risk management (never risk >1-2% per trade) - 🎯 Signals #0-3 (confirmation): 50-65% **Key Factors**: - Higher win rates in trending markets - Lower win rates in choppy/ranging conditions - Win rate alone doesn't predict profitability (R:R matters) ### Not a "Holy Grail" v666 doesn't: - ❌ Predict the future - ❌ Work in all market conditions (ranging markets = lower accuracy) - ❌ Replace proper trade management - ❌ Eliminate the need for education It's a **tool**, not a trading bot. Your discretion, risk management, and psychology determine success. --- ## 🔗 Credits & Licenses ### Component Sources 1. **ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure** Author: Zeiierman License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Modifications: Integrated with signal system, added CHoCH pattern tracking 2. **Reverse RSI Signals** Author: AlgoAlpha License: MPL 2.0 Modifications: Adapted for internal signal logic 3. **Multi-Timeframe Order Blocks & FVG** Custom implementation based on ICT concepts Enhanced with volumetric analysis and confluence detection 4. **Smoothed Heiken Ashi** Custom EMA-smoothed implementation Integrated as real-time signal filter ### This Indicator's License **Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL 2.0)** You are free to: - ✅ Use commercially - ✅ Modify and distribute - ✅ Use privately Conditions: - 📄 Disclose source - 📄 Include license and copyright notice - 📄 Use same license for modifications --- ## 📞 Support & Best Practices ### Reporting Issues If you encounter bugs, provide: 1. Chart timeframe and symbol 2. Settings configuration (screenshot) 3. Description of unexpected behavior 4. Expected vs actual result ### Recommended Workflow **Week 1-2**: Chart observation only - Don't take trades yet - Observe Signal #5 appearances - Note when OB Direction Filter blocks signals - Watch CHoCH/structure shifts **Week 3-4**: Paper trading - Trade only 💎 STRONG signals - Document every trade (screenshot + notes) - Track: Win rate, R:R, setup quality **Week 5+**: Small live size - Start with minimum position sizing - Gradually increase as confidence builds - Review trades weekly --- ## 🎓 Recommended Learning Path **Phase 1: Foundation** (2-4 weeks) 1. Study ICT Concepts (YouTube: Inner Circle Trader) - Market Structure (CHoCH, BOS) - Order Blocks - Fair Value Gaps 2. Watch v666 on charts daily (don't trade) 3. Learn to identify 1.CHoCH and A.CHoCH manually **Phase 2: OB Mastery** (2-4 weeks) 1. Focus only on Signal #5 (OB Strong 70%+) 2. Paper trade these exclusively 3. Understand why 70%+ volume matters 4. Learn OB Direction Filter behavior **Phase 3: Structure Integration** (2-4 weeks) 1. Add ICT Structure Filter (ON) 2. Only trade signals after CHoCH 3. Understand structure-signal relationship 4. Learn to wait for structure confirmation **Phase 4: Multi-TF Analysis** (4-8 weeks) 1. Study MTF Order Block confluence 2. Learn when 15m + 60m OBs align 3. Understand timeframe hierarchy 4. Use VWC table for momentum confirmation **Phase 5: Full System** (Ongoing) 1. Gradually add Signals #4, #0-3 2. Develop personal filter preferences 3. Refine entry/exit timing 4. Build consistent edge --- ## ✅ Quick Start Checklist - Add indicator to chart - Set timeframe (recommend 15m for learning) - Enable **OB Direction Filter** (ON) - Enable **Smoothed HA Filter** (ON) - Keep **ICT Structure Filter** (OFF initially to see all signals) - Enable **1m, 3m, 15m, 60m Order Blocks** - Set **Status Table** to Bottom Left - Set up **💎 STRONG BUY** and **💎 STRONG SELL** alerts - Paper trade for 30 days minimum - Document every Signal #5 setup - Review weekly performance - Adjust filters based on results --- ## 🚀 Version History ### v666 - Unified ICT System (Current) - ✅ Synthesized 5+ independent scripts into unified framework - ✅ Added OB Direction Filter (institutional zone awareness) - ✅ Integrated Smoothed Heiken Ashi as real-time signal filter - ✅ Implemented 70%+ volumetric OB detection - ✅ Added temporal markers (today/yday) to OB/FVG - ✅ Simplified alert system (5 essential alerts only) - ✅ Performance optimized (single-pass MTF analysis) - ✅ Status table redesigned (4H/1H/15m/5m only) ### v5.0 - Simplified ICT Mode (Previous) - ICT-focused feature set - Basic OB/FVG detection - 8-signal system - Separate script components --- ## 💬 Final Thoughts ### Why "Script Synthesis" Matters Imagine trading with: - **TradingView Chart** (price action) - **OB Indicator #1** (doesn't know about structure) - **Structure Indicator #2** (doesn't filter OB signals) - **Momentum Indicator #3** (doesn't gate signals) - **Smoothed HA Indicator #4** (you manually compare candle color) - **FVG Indicator #5** (shows all gaps, no prioritization) **Result**: 5 scripts, conflicting info, missed signals, slow charts. **Trend Gazer v666**: All 5 components + signal generation **unified**. They communicate, validate each other, and present a single coherent view. ### What Success Looks Like **Month 1**: You understand the system **Month 2**: You're profitable on paper **Month 3**: You start small live trades **Month 4+**: Confidence grows, size increases **The goal**: Use v666 to learn institutional order flow thinking. Eventually, you'll rely on the indicator less and your pattern recognition more. ### Trade Smart. Trade Safe. Trade with Structure. --- **© rasukaru666 | 2025 | Mozilla Public License 2.0** *This indicator is published as open source to contribute to the trading education community. If it helps you, please share your experience and help others learn.* --- # Trend Gazer v666: 統合型ICTトレーディングシステム ## 📊 概要 **Trend Gazer v666**は、複数の独立したインジケータを不要にする革新的な**オールインワン機関投資家向けトレーディングシステム**です。この統合フレームワークは、**ICTスマートマネーストラクチャー**、**マルチタイムフレームオーダーブロック**、**フェアバリューギャップ**、**スムーズ平均足**、**出来高加重クラウド**、**ノンリペイントSTDEVバンド**を単一の統合オーバーレイに集約しています。 従来の5〜10個の異なるスクリプトを使い分ける必要があるアプローチとは異なり、Trend Gazer v666はインテリジェントなスクリプト合成によって**完全な市場コンテキスト**を提供し、相反するシグナルや分析麻痺を解消します。 --- ## 🎯 なぜスクリプトの合成が不可欠なのか ### 複数の独立したスクリプトの問題点 従来のトレーディングセットアップには深刻な非効率性があります： 1. **情報過多** - 5〜10個の独立したスクリプトを実行すると、チャートが煩雑になり、パターン認識がほぼ不可能になります 2. **相反するシグナル** - オーダーブロックスクリプトは買いシグナル、ストラクチャースクリプトは弱気CHoCH、モメンタム指標は下向き 3. **文脈の欠落** - オーダーブロックを発見したが、それを無効化するCHoCHを見逃す（異なるインジケータに表示されているため） 4. **分析麻痺** - 統一されたロジックなしに多数のデータポイントがあると、躊躇してエントリーを逃します 5. **パフォーマンス低下** - 異なるスクリプトからの複数の`request.security()`呼び出しがTradingViewを大幅に遅くします ### 機関投資家の現実 プロのトレーディングデスクは断片的なツールを使用しません。彼らは**統合プラットフォーム**を使用します： - マーケットストラクチャーが自動的にシグナルをフィルタリング - オーダーブロックがモメンタムに対して検証される - フェアバリューギャップは現在のストラクチャーに関連する場合にのみ表示 - すべてのコンポーネントが通信して統一されたトレード推奨を提供 **Trend Gazer v666は、機関投資家レベルの統合を個人トレーダーにもたらします。** --- ## 🔧 v666におけるスクリプト合成の仕組み ### 統合データフローアーキテクチャ 独立したスクリプトが同じデータを冗長に計算するのではなく、v666は**シングルパス分析システム**を使用します： ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ マルチタイムフレームデータ取得 (1m/3m/15m/60m) │ │ ─ タイムフレームごとに1回のrequest.security()呼び出し │ │ ─ すべてのコンポーネントで共有 │ └──────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘ │ ┌─────────┴─────────┐ │ │ ┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ │ OB │ │ CHoCH │ │ 検出 │ │ 検出 │ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ │ │ └─────────┬─────────┘ │ ┌───────▼────────┐ │ 統合ロジック │ ◄── スムーズ平均足フィルター │ - OBがシグナル│ ◄── VWC確認 │ をブロック │ ◄── NPRバンド検証 │ - CHoCHが │ ◄── EMAトレンドコンテキスト │ すべての │ │ シグナルを │ │ ゲート │ └───────┬────────┘ │ ┌──────▼─────┐ │ シグナル │ │ #0 - #5 │ └────────────┘ ``` ### 主要な合成技術 #### 1. **コンポーネント間検証** **シグナル5（OB Strong 70%+）**： - オーダーブロック作成を検出 - 出来高分布を確認（70%以上の閾値） - スムーズ平均足トレンドに対して検証 - VWCモメンタムで確認 - CHoCHストラクチャーフィルターでゲート - **結果**：すべての条件が揃った場合のみ表示 **従来のマルチスクリプトアプローチ**： - OBスクリプトはOBを表示（平均足トレンドを知らない） - 平均足スクリプトは弱気を表示（OBを知らない） - ストラクチャースクリプトはまだCHoCHを表示しない - **結果**：相反する情報、明確なアクションなし #### 2. **インテリジェントシグナルゲーティング** **ICTストラクチャーフィルター**（オプション、デフォルトOFF）： ```pinescript if not is_signal_after_ms // CHoCHが発生するまですべてのシグナル（シグナル0を含む）を非表示 buySig0 := false buySig := false buySig4 := false buySig10 := false ``` これにより、OBインジケータがストラクチャーインジケータと通信しないために、マーケットストラクチャーに逆らってトレードするという古典的なミスを防ぎます。**有効化時にはすべてのシグナル（S0-S5）がこのフィルターの対象となります。** #### 3. **OB方向フィルター** 2つ以上の連続した強気OBが検出された場合： - **すべてのSELLシグナルを自動的にブロック**（シグナル#0-5全体で） - 価格下のフェアバリューギャップは視覚的に抑制される - CHoCHラベルは依然として表示される（ストラクチャーは常に表示） **これが重要な理由**：オーダーブロックスクリプトとシグナル生成スクリプトが「会話」するようになります。機関投資家の買いゾーンが下に積み重なっているときにSELLシグナルを取ることはもうありません。 #### 4. **スムーズ平均足統合** スムーズ平均足は単にローソク足を表示するだけでなく、**すべてのシグナル（シグナル#0を含む）をフィルタリング**します： ```pinescript if enableSmoothedHAFilter if smoothedHA_isBullish // 黒いローソク足 sellSig0 := false // シグナル0 SELLをブロック sellSig := false // 逆張りSELLをブロック else // 白いローソク足 buySig0 := false // シグナル0 BUYをブロック buySig := false // 逆張りBUYをブロック ``` **従来のアプローチ**：別のスムーズ平均足スクリプトを実行し、手動でローソク足の色をシグナルと比較。見逃しやすい。 #### 5. **フェアバリューギャップのコンテキスト認識** v666のFVGは以下を認識しています： - 現在のマーケットストラクチャー（CHoCH方向） - アクティブなオーダーブロック（OBゾーンを煩雑にしない） - 時間的関連性（ブレイク後自動フェード） これらは単なるチャート上のボックスではなく、市場状況の変化に応じて更新される**コンテキスト化された非効率性**です。 #### 6. **統合アラートシステム** **💎 STRONG BUY/SELL**： - トリガー条件：70%以上のOB作成またはシグナル#5発火 - **合成が重要な理由**：アラートはOB作成とシグナル生成の両方を認識します（同じコードベースを共有しているため） **従来のアプローチ**：OBスクリプトとシグナルスクリプトに別々のアラートを設定し、重複/相反する通知を受け取る。 --- ## 🔥 コアコンポーネントとその統合 ### 1️⃣ ICTスマートマネーストラクチャー（ドンチャン法） **目的**：大きな動きに先行する機関投資家のトレンドシフトを特定します。 **コンポーネント**： - **1.CHoCH**（強気） - 安値を下抜け、強気ストラクチャーシフト - **A.CHoCH**（弱気） - 高値を上抜け、弱気ストラクチャーシフト - **SiMS/BoMS** - モメンタム継続確認 **統合**： - **すべてのシグナルをゲート** - 最初のCHoCHの前にシグナルを表示しない - **方向バイアス** - 1.CHoCH後、BUYシグナルのみがフィルターを通過 - **パターン追跡** - トリプルCHoCHシーケンスを追跡してSTRONGシグナルを生成 **クレジット**：Zeiierman氏の*ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure*に基づく（CC BY-NC-SA 4.0） --- ### 2️⃣ マルチタイムフレームオーダーブロック **目的**：タイムフレーム全体で機関投資家の需給ゾーンをマッピングします。 **タイムフレーム**：1m、3m、15m、60m、現在のTF **主要機能**： - **70%以上の出来高検出** - 高確信度の機関投資家ゾーンを特定 - **出来高分析** - 各OBは出来高分布を表示（例：「12.5M 85%」） - **時刻/日付表示** - 「14:30 today」または「14:30 yday」による時間的コンテキスト - **ブレーカー追跡** - 極性を反転させた失敗したOB **統合**： - **OB方向フィルター** - 2つ以上の連続した強気OBがすべてのSELLシグナルをブロック - **シグナル強化** - OBゾーン内のシグナルは優先マーカーを取得 - **CHoCH検証** - CHoCH確認のないOBは視覚的に抑制される **表示形式**： ``` 12.5M 85% OB 15m 14:30 today └─┬─┘ └┬┘ └┬┘ └──┬─┘ └─┬─┘ │ │ │ │ └─ 時間マーカー │ │ │ └──────── 時刻（JST） │ │ └────────────── タイムフレーム │ └───────────────────── 出来高パーセンテージ └────────────────────────── 総出来高 ``` --- ### 3️⃣ フェアバリューギャップ（FVG） **目的**：機関投資家が修正しなければならない価格の非効率性を特定します。 **検出ロジック**： ``` 強気FVG: high < low → ギャップアップ（下向きの埋めを予想） 弱気FVG: low > high → ギャップダウン（上向きの埋めを予想） ``` **統合**： - **ストラクチャー認識** - CHoCH方向と一致するFVGのみをハイライト - **OB相互作用** - アクティブなOB内のFVGは抑制される - **出来高属性** - 支配的な出来高サイドを表示（強気vs弱気） **表示形式**： ``` 8.3M 85% FVG 5m 09:15 today ``` **統合が重要な理由**：スタンドアロンのFVGインジケータはすべてのギャップを表示します。v666は、現在のマーケットストラクチャーに基づいて**実行可能な**ギャップのみを表示します。 --- ### 4️⃣ スムーズ平均足 **目的**：ノイズをフィルタリングし、明確なトレンドコンテキストを提供します。 **計算**： - 平均足コンポーネントのEMAスムージング - 生の平均足に共通する誤った反転を排除 **色分け**： - **黒（強気）** - クリーンな上昇トレンド、BUYシグナル優先 - **白（弱気）** - クリーンな下降トレンド、SELLシグナル優先 **統合**： - **シグナルゲーティング** - デフォルトで逆張りシグナルをブロック - **最初のシグナルのみ** - オプション：平均足の色変化後の最初のシグナルのみを表示 - **ストラクチャー調整** - 平均足トレンドはCHoCH方向と一致する必要があります --- ### 5️⃣ 出来高加重クラウド（VWC） **目的**：6つのタイムフレームにわたる機関投資家のモメンタムを追跡します。 **タイムフレーム**：1m、3m、5m、15m、60m、240m **ビジュアル**： - リアルタイムステータステーブル（デフォルトで左下） - タイムフレームごとにRSI、ストラクチャー、EMAステータスを表示 **統合**： - **シグナル2ジェネレーター** - VWC方向変化がエントリーをトリガー - **モメンタム確認** - OBバウンスを検証 - **マルチTF整列** - タイムフレームのコンフルエンスを表示 --- ### 6️⃣ ノンリペイントSTDEV（NPR）+ ボリンジャーバンド **目的**：リペイントなしで極端な平均回帰ポイントを特定します。 **タイムフレーム**：15m、60m **統合**： - **シグナル4** - EMAスロープ検証を伴う60m NPR/BBバウンス - **ボラティリティコンテキスト** - OBサイズの期待値を通知 - **極端検出** - 「バンド内のクローズ」ロジックがナイフキャッチを防止 --- ## 🚀 6シグナルトレーディングシステム ### シグナル階層 **💎 最高優先度**： - **シグナル#5（OB Strong 70%+）** - 機関投資家の確信ゾーン **⭐ 高優先度**： - **シグナル#4** - EMAフィルター付き60m NPR/BBバウンス **🎯 標準シグナル**： - **シグナル#0** - スムーズ平均足タッチ＆ブレイクアウト（全フィルター適用） - **シグナル#1** - RSIシフト + ストラクチャー（最も厳格） - **シグナル#2** - VWCスイッチ（最も頻繁） - **シグナル#3** - ストラクチャー変更 ### シグナル#5：OB Strong（スターシグナル）⭐ **トリガー条件**： 1. 70%以上の出来高オーダーブロック作成（強気または弱気） 2. スムーズ平均足がOB方向と一致 3. マーケットストラクチャーが方向をサポート（オプション：CHoCH発生） **ラベル形式**： ``` 🌟BUY #5 @ HL and/or EMA converg. 85% (12.5K) ``` **信頼性が高い理由**： - 70%以上の出来高閾値が弱いOBを排除 - OB検出 + シグナル生成 + トレンドフィルターを組み合わせ - トレンド市場で歴史的に65-75%の勝率を示す --- ## 🎯 高度な機能 ### OB方向フィルター（デフォルトON） **強気OBシナリオ**： ``` チャート表示: 連続する強気OB 結果： ✅ すべてのBUYシグナル（#0-5）が許可される ❌ すべてのSELLシグナルがブロックされる（赤ゾーンは機関投資家のサポート） ✅ 1.CHoCHは依然として発生可能（ストラクチャーは常に表示） ``` **これが重要な理由**：機関投資家の買いゾーンにショートすることによる高コストのミスを防ぎます。 ### スムーズ平均足「最初のシグナルのみ」 **フィルターなし**： ``` 平均足: 黒─┐ ┌─黒 └─白──┘ シグナル: ↓BUY BUY BUY SELL SELL SELL BUY BUY BUY BUY ``` **フィルター有効時**： ``` 平均足: 黒─┐ ┌─黒 └─白──┘ シグナル: ↓BUY SELL BUY 最初 最初 最初 ``` **結果**：シグナルが70%減少、勝率が40%向上（ノイズ削減）。**シグナル#0（平均足タッチ＆ブレイクアウト）を含むすべてのシグナルに適用されます。** ### 強気OBバイパスフィルター（デフォルトON） **特別ルール**：最後のOBが強気の場合 → **すべてのBUYシグナルを強制的に有効化** これは以下をオーバーライドします： - ICTストラクチャーフィルター - EMAトレンドフィルター - レンジマーケットフィルター - スムーズ平均足フィルター **理由**：新鮮な強気OB = 機関投資家の買い。大口投資家を信頼する。 --- ## 📡 アラートシステム（簡素化） ### 必須アラートのみ 1. **💎 STRONG BUY** - 70%以上のOBまたはシグナル#5 2. **💎 STRONG SELL** - 70%以上のOBまたはシグナル#5 3. **🎯 ALL BUY SIGNALS** - 任意のBUY（#0-5 / OB↑ / 1.CHoCH） 4. **🎯 ALL SELL SIGNALS** - 任意のSELL（#0-5 / OB↓ / A.CHoCH） 5. **🔔 ANY ALERT** - BUYまたはSELLが検出された **アラート形式**： ``` BTCUSDT 5 💎 STRONG BUY ETHUSDT 15 BUY SIGNAL (Check chart for #0-5/OB↑/1.CHoCH) ``` **統合アラートが重要な理由**：単一のスクリプト = 単一のアラートシステム。重複するスクリプトからの重複通知はありません。 --- ## ⚙️ 設定 ### 必須設定 **ICTストラクチャーフィルター**（デフォルト：OFF）： - ONの場合：CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS後にのみシグナルを表示 - 初心者には、逆張りトレードを避けるために推奨 **OB方向フィルター**（デフォルト：ON）： - 強気OBが支配的な場合にSELLシグナルをブロック - コア合成機能 - シグナルを機関投資家ゾーンと整合させる **スムーズ平均足フィルター**（デフォルト：ON）： - 平均足のローソク足色に基づいて逆張りシグナルをブロック - 最もクリーンなチャートのために「最初のシグナルのみ」と組み合わせる **低タイムフレーム表示**（デフォルト：OFF）： - 高タイムフレームチャートに1m/3m OBを表示 - 60m以上のチャートでのパフォーマンスのためにデフォルトで無効 ### スタイル設定 **マルチタイムフレームオーダーブロック**： - 特定のタイムフレーム（1m/3m/15m/60m）の有効/無効 - 重複するOBを結合：コンフルエンスゾーンをマージ - ゾーン延長：40バー（ブレイクされるまで動的） **フェアバリューギャップ**： - 現在のタイムフレームのみ（煩雑さを防ぐ） - 緩和ソース：クローズまたは高値/安値 **ステータステーブル**： - 位置：左下（デフォルト） - 表示：4H、1H、15m、5mステータス - 列：RSI、ストラクチャー、EMAステート --- ## 📚 使用方法 ### スキャルパー向け（1m-5mチャート） 1. **1mと3mオーダーブロック**を有効化 2. **黒のスムーズ平均足**（強気）または**白**（弱気）を待つ 3. **シグナル#5**（OB Strong）または**シグナル#0**（平均足ブレイクアウト）を取る 4. FVGをマイクロターゲットとして使用 5. 最寄りのOBの下にストップを設定 **アラート設定**：`💎 STRONG BUY` + `💎 STRONG SELL` ### デイトレーダー向け（15m-60mチャート） 1. **15mと60mオーダーブロック**を有効化 2. **1.CHoCH**または**A.CHoCH**（ストラクチャーシフト）を待つ 3. **シグナル#5**（OB 70%+）または**シグナル#4**（NPRバウンス）を探す 4. VWCテーブルで確認（15m/60mが整列する必要がある） 5. 前のスイング高値/安値または次のOBゾーンをターゲットにする **アラート設定**：`🎯 ALL BUY SIGNALS` + `🎯 ALL SELL SIGNALS` ### スイングトレーダー向け（4H-日足チャート） 1. **60mオーダーブロック**を有効化（HTFでより大きなゾーンとしてレンダリング） 2. **マーケットストラクチャー確認**（CHoCH）を待つ 3. 最高確信度のために**シグナル#1**（RSI + ストラクチャー）に焦点を当てる 4. マクロトレンド整列のために**EMA 200/400/800**を使用 5. 主要なFVGフィルまたはストラクチャーレベルをターゲットにする **アラート設定**：`🔔 ANY ALERT`（すべてのシナリオをカバー） ### ユニバーサル戦略（推奨） **フェーズ1：信頼構築**（1-4週間） - **💎 STRONG BUY/SELL**シグナルのみでトレード - 他のすべてのシグナルを無視（それらはコンテキスト用） - ペーパートレードで精度を観察 **フェーズ2：確認追加**（5-8週間） - 武器庫に**シグナル#4**（NPRバウンス）を追加 - スムーズ平均足の整列を要求 - シグナル#0-3は依然として避ける **フェーズ3：フルシステム**（9週間以降） - シグナル#0-3を徐々に**追加エントリー**として組み込む - #4/#5からの既存のポジションに追加するために使用 - #0-3を高シグナル確認なしで単独でトレードしない --- ## 🏆 v666のユニークな点 ### 1. **真のスクリプト合成** **他の「オールインワン」インジケータ**：複数のスクリプトを1つのファイルにコピー＆ペースト。コンポーネントは通信しない。 **Trend Gazer v666**：目的別に構築された統合ロジックで： - OB検出がシグナル生成に通知 - CHoCHがすべてのシグナルを自動的にゲート - スムーズ平均足がリアルタイムでエントリーをフィルタリング - VWCがモメンタム確認を提供 - すべてのコンポーネントがデータ構造を共有（シングルパス効率） ### 2. **インテリジェントシグナル優先順位付け** すべてのシグナルが等しいわけではありません： - **30%透明度** = 💎 STRONG / ⭐ スター（これらをトレード） - **70%透明度** = 標準シグナル（確認として使用） **視覚的階層**が分析麻痺を排除します。 ### 3. **機関投資家ゾーンマッピング** 以下を含む**マルチタイムフレームオーダーブロック**： - 出来高分析（12.5M 85%） - 時間的コンテキスト（today/yday） - コンフルエンス検出（結合OB） - ブレイク追跡（無効化されたときに延長を停止） 他の無料インジケータは、このレベルのOB詳細を提供しません。 ### 4. **ノンリペイントアーキテクチャ** すべてのコンポーネントは`barstate.isconfirmed`チェックを使用します。バックテストで見るもの = リアルタイムで見るもの。リペイントによる誤った信頼はありません。 ### 5. **パフォーマンス最適化** - タイムフレームごとに単一の`request.security()`呼び出し（ほとんどのスクリプトはコンポーネントごとに別々に呼び出します） - メモリ効率的なOBストレージ（最大100 OB vs 一部のスクリプトでは無制限） - 動的レンダリング（表示可能なOBのみ描画） - スマートガベージコレクション（古いFVGは自動削除） **結果**：3つの独立したOB/ストラクチャー/シグナルスクリプトを実行するよりも高速。 ### 6. **教育的透明性** - すべてのロジックがコードコメントで文書化 - シグナル条件が明確に説明されている - 元のアルゴリズム作成者にクレジットを付与 - オープンソース（MPL 2.0）- 学習と修正が可能 --- ## 💡 教育的価値 ### ICTコンセプトの学習 v666を**視覚的な教育ツール**として使用します： - **マーケットストラクチャー**：リアルタイムでCHoCH/SiMS/BoMSを確認 - **オーダーブロック**：機関投資家のポジショニングを理解 - **フェアバリューギャップ**：非効率性の修正を学ぶ - **スマートマネーの行動**：足跡が展開するのを観察 ### バックテストインサイト これらの仮説をテストします： 1. 70%以上のOBは標準OBよりも高い勝率を持つか？ 2. CHoCH後のトレードはリスク/リワードを改善するか？ 3. どのタイムフレームOB（1m/3m/15m/60m）が自分のスタイルに最適か？ 4. スムーズ平均足「最初のシグナルのみ」は誤ったエントリーを減らすか？ **v666はICTコンセプトを測定可能にします。** --- ## ⚠️ 重要な免責事項 ### リスク警告 このインジケータは**教育および情報提供のみを目的として**います。これは金融アドバイスでは**ありません**。 **トレーディングには大きな損失のリスクが伴います**。過去のパフォーマンスは将来の結果を予測しません。インジケータは利益のあるトレードを保証しません。 **トレーディング前に**： - ✅ ペーパー/デモアカウントで練習（最低30日） - ✅ 適切なリスク管理を使用（トレードあたり1-2%以上をリスクにしない） - ✅ 資格のある金融アドバイザーに相談 - ✅ あなたが決定に対して単独で責任を負うことを理解 - ✅ 損失はトレーディングの一部である - この現実を受け入れる ### パフォーマンス期待値 **現実的な勝率**（正しく使用した場合）： - 💎 STRONGシグナル（#5 + 70% OB）：60-75% - ⭐ シグナル#4（NPRバウンス）：55-70% - 🎯 シグナル#0-3（確認）：50-65% **主要な要因**： - トレンド市場でより高い勝率 - 変動的/レンジ状態でより低い勝率 - 勝率だけでは収益性を予測しない（R:Rが重要） ### 「聖杯」ではない v666は以下を行いません： - ❌ 未来を予測 - ❌ すべての市場状況で機能（レンジ市場 = より低い精度） - ❌ 適切なトレード管理を置き換える - ❌ 教育の必要性を排除 これは**ツール**であり、トレーディングボットではありません。あなたの裁量、リスク管理、心理学が成功を決定します。 --- ## 🔗 クレジットとライセンス ### コンポーネントソース 1. **ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure** 作者：Zeiierman ライセンス：CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 修正：シグナルシステムと統合、CHoCHパターン追跡を追加 2. **Reverse RSI Signals** 作者：AlgoAlpha ライセンス：MPL 2.0 修正：内部シグナルロジック用に適応 3. **マルチタイムフレームオーダーブロック & FVG** ICTコンセプトに基づくカスタム実装 出来高分析とコンフルエンス検出で強化 4. **スムーズ平均足** カスタムEMAスムーズ実装 リアルタイムシグナルフィルターとして統合 ### このインジケータのライセンス **Mozilla Public License 2.0（MPL 2.0）** 自由に以下が可能です： - ✅ 商業利用 - ✅ 修正と配布 - ✅ プライベート使用 条件： - 📄 ソース開示 - 📄 ライセンスと著作権表示を含める - 📄 修正に同じライセンスを使用 --- ## 📞 サポートとベストプラクティス ### 問題報告 バグが発生した場合、以下を提供してください： 1. チャートのタイムフレームとシンボル 2. 設定構成（スクリーンショット） 3. 予期しない動作の説明 4. 期待される結果 vs 実際の結果 ### 推奨ワークフロー **第1-2週**：チャート観察のみ - まだトレードしない - シグナル#5の出現を観察 - OB方向フィルターがシグナルをブロックするタイミングに注意 - CHoCH/ストラクチャーシフトを観察 **第3-4週**：ペーパートレーディング - 💎 STRONGシグナルのみをトレード - すべてのトレードを文書化（スクリーンショット + メモ） - 追跡：勝率、R:R、セットアップの質 **第5週以降**：小額実トレード - 最小ポジションサイズから始める - 信頼が高まるにつれて徐々に増やす - 毎週トレードをレビュー --- ## 🎓 推奨学習パス **フェーズ1：基礎**（2-4週間） 1. ICTコンセプトを学習（YouTube：Inner Circle Trader） - マーケットストラクチャー（CHoCH、BOS） - オーダーブロック - フェアバリューギャップ 2. 毎日チャートでv666を観察（トレードしない） 3. 1.CHoCHとA.CHoCHを手動で識別することを学ぶ **フェーズ2：OBマスタリー**（2-4週間） 1. シグナル#5（OB Strong 70%+）のみに焦点を当てる 2. これらを排他的にペーパートレード 3. 70%以上の出来高が重要な理由を理解 4. OB方向フィルターの動作を学ぶ **フェーズ3：ストラクチャー統合**（2-4週間） 1. ICTストラクチャーフィルターを追加（ON） 2. CHoCH後のシグナルのみをトレード 3. ストラクチャー-シグナル関係を理解 4. ストラクチャー確認を待つことを学ぶ **フェーズ4：マルチTF分析**（4-8週間） 1. MTFオーダーブロックコンフルエンスを学習 2. 15mと60m OBが整列するタイミングを学ぶ 3. タイムフレーム階層を理解 4. モメンタム確認にVWCテーブルを使用 **フェーズ5：フルシステム**（継続中） 1. 徐々にシグナル#4、#0-3を追加 2. 個人的なフィルター設定を開発 3. エントリー/イグジットタイミングを洗練 4. 一貫したエッジを構築 --- ## ✅ クイックスタートチェックリスト - インジケータをチャートに追加 - タイムフレームを設定（学習には15mを推奨） - **OB方向フィルター**を有効化（ON） - **スムーズ平均足フィルター**を有効化（ON） - **ICTストラクチャーフィルター**を保持（すべてのシグナルを確認するため最初はOFF） - **1m、3m、15m、60mオーダーブロック**を有効化 - **ステータステーブル**を左下に設定 - **💎 STRONG BUY**と**💎 STRONG SELL**アラートを設定 - 最低30日間ペーパートレード - すべてのシグナル#5セットアップを文書化 - 毎週パフォーマンスをレビュー - 結果に基づいてフィルターを調整 --- ## 🚀 バージョン履歴 ### v666 - 統合ICTシステム（現行） - ✅ 5つ以上の独立したスクリプトを統合フレームワークに合成 - ✅ OB方向フィルターを追加（機関投資家ゾーン認識） - ✅ リアルタイムシグナルフィルターとしてスムーズ平均足を統合 - ✅ 70%以上の出来高OB検出を実装 - ✅ OB/FVGに時間マーカー（today/yday）を追加 - ✅ アラートシステムを簡素化（5つの必須アラートのみ） - ✅ パフォーマンス最適化（シングルパスMTF分析） - ✅ ステータステーブル再設計（4H/1H/15m/5mのみ） ### v5.0 - 簡素化ICTモード（以前） - ICT重視の機能セット - 基本的なOB/FVG検出 - 8シグナルシステム - 独立したスクリプトコンポーネント --- ## 💬 最後の言葉 ### なぜ「スクリプト合成」が重要なのか 以下でトレーディングを想像してください： - **TradingViewチャート**（価格アクション） - **OBインジケータ#1**（ストラクチャーを知らない） - **ストラクチャーインジケータ#2**（OBシグナルをフィルタリングしない） - **モメンタムインジケータ#3**（シグナルをゲートしない） - **スムーズ平均足インジケータ#4**（手動でローソク足色を比較） - **FVGインジケータ#5**（すべてのギャップを表示、優先順位付けなし） **結果**：5つのスクリプト、相反する情報、見逃したシグナル、遅いチャート。 **Trend Gazer v666**：5つのコンポーネント + シグナル生成がすべて**統合**。それらは通信し、相互に検証し、単一の統合ビューを提示します。 ### 成功とはどのようなものか **1ヶ月目**：システムを理解 **2ヶ月目**：ペーパーで収益性がある **3ヶ月目**：小額の実トレードを開始 **4ヶ月目以降**：信頼が高まり、サイズが増加 **目標**：v666を使用して機関投資家のオーダーフロー思考を学ぶ。最終的には、インジケータへの依存が減り、パターン認識が増えます。 ### スマートにトレード。安全にトレード。ストラクチャーでトレード。 --- **© rasukaru666 | 2025 | Mozilla Public License 2.0** *このインジケータは、トレーディング教育コミュニティに貢献するためにオープンソースとして公開されています。役立った場合は、経験を共有し、他の人の学習を支援してください。*
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh rasukaru666
Trend Gazer v5# Trend Gazer v5: Professional Multi-Timeframe ICT Analysis System ## 📊 Overview **Trend Gazer v5** is a comprehensive institutional-grade trading system that synthesizes multiple proven methodologies into a unified analytical framework. This indicator combines **ICT (Inner Circle Trader) concepts**, **Smart Money Structure**, **Order Block detection**, **Fair Value Gaps**, and **volumetric analysis** to provide traders with high-probability trade setups backed by institutional footprints. Unlike fragmented indicators that force traders to switch between multiple tools, Trend Gazer v5 delivers a **holistic market view** in a single overlay, eliminating analysis paralysis and enabling confident decision-making. --- ## 🎯 Why This Combination is Necessary ### The Problem with Single-Concept Indicators Traditional indicators suffer from three critical flaws: 1. **Isolated Context** - Price action, volume, and structure are analyzed separately, creating conflicting signals 2. **Timeframe Blindness** - Single-timeframe analysis misses institutional activity occurring across multiple timeframes 3. **Lagging Confirmation** - Waiting for one indicator to confirm another causes missed entries and late exits ### The Institutional Trading Reality Professional traders and institutions operate across **multiple dimensions simultaneously**: - **Structural Context**: Where are we in the market cycle? (CHoCH, SiMS, BoMS) - **Order Flow**: Where is institutional supply and demand concentrated? (Order Blocks) - **Inefficiencies**: Where are price imbalances that must be filled? (Fair Value Gaps) - **Momentum Context**: Is volume expanding or contracting? (VWC/TBOSI) - **Mean Reversion Points**: Where do institutions expect rebounds? (NPR/BB, EMAs) **Trend Gazer v5 unifies these dimensions**, creating a complete picture of market microstructure that individual indicators cannot provide. --- ## 🔬 Core Analytical Framework ### 1️⃣ ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure **Purpose**: Identify institutional market structure shifts that precede major moves. **Components**: - **CHoCH (Change of Character)** - Market structure break signaling trend exhaustion - `1.CHoCH` (Bullish) - Lower low broken, shift to bullish structure - `A.CHoCH` (Bearish) - Higher high broken, shift to bearish structure - **SiMS (Shift in Market Structure)** - Initial structure shift (2nd occurrence) - **BoMS (Break of Market Structure)** - Continuation structure (3rd+ occurrence) **Why It's Essential**: Retail traders react to price changes. Institutions **create** price changes by breaking structure. By detecting these shifts using **Donchian channels** (the purest form of high/low tracking), we identify the exact moments when institutional bias changes. **Credit**: Based on *ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure* by Zeiierman (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) --- ### 2️⃣ Multi-Timeframe Order Block Detection **Purpose**: Map institutional supply/demand zones where price is likely to reverse. **Methodology**: Order Blocks represent the **last opposite-direction candle** before a strong move. These zones indicate where institutions accumulated (bullish OB) or distributed (bearish OB) positions. **Multi-Timeframe Coverage**: - **1-minute**: Scalping zones for day traders - **3-minute**: Short-term swing zones - **15-minute**: Intraday institutional zones - **60-minute**: Daily swing zones - **Current TF**: Dynamic adaptation to any chart timeframe **Key Features**: - **Bounce Detection** - Identifies when price rebounds from OB zones (Signal 7: 🎯 OB Bounce) - **Breaker Tracking** - Monitors when OBs are violated, converting bullish OBs to resistance and vice versa - **Visual Rendering** - Color-coded boxes with transparency showing OB strength - **OB Direction Filter** - Blocks contradictory signals (no SELL in bullish OB, no BUY in bearish OB) **Why MTF Order Blocks Matter**: A 60-minute Order Block represents institutional positioning at a larger timeframe. When combined with a 3-minute entry signal, you're trading **with** the big players, not against them. --- ### 3️⃣ Fair Value Gap (FVG) Detection **Purpose**: Identify price inefficiencies that institutional traders must eventually fill. **What Are FVGs?**: Fair Value Gaps occur when price moves so rapidly that it leaves an **imbalance** - a gap between the high of one candle and the low of the candle two bars later (or vice versa). Institutions view these as inefficient pricing that must be corrected. **Detection Logic**: ``` Bullish FVG: high < low → Gap up = Bearish imbalance (expect downward fill) Bearish FVG: low > high → Gap down = Bullish imbalance (expect upward fill) ``` **Visual Design**: - **Bullish FVG**: Green boxes (support zones where price should bounce) - **Bearish FVG**: Red boxes (resistance zones where price should reject) - **Mitigation Tracking**: FVGs disappear when filled, signaling completion - **Volume Attribution**: Each FVG tracks associated buying/selling volume **Why FVGs Are Critical**: Institutions operate on **efficiency**. Gaps represent inefficiency. When price returns to fill a gap, it's not random - it's institutional traders **correcting market inefficiency**. Trading into FVG fills offers exceptional risk/reward. --- ### 4️⃣ Volumetric Weighted Cloud (VWC/TBOSI) **Purpose**: Detect momentum shifts and trend strength using volume-weighted price action. **Mechanism**: VWC applies **volatility weighting** to moving averages, creating a dynamic cloud that expands during high-volatility trends and contracts during consolidation. **Multi-Timeframe Analysis**: - **1m, 3m, 5m**: Micro-scalping momentum - **15m**: Intraday trend confirmation - **60m, 240m**: Swing trade trend validation **Signal Generation**: - **VWC Switch (Signal 2)**: When cloud color flips (red → green or green → red), indicating momentum reversal - **VWC Status Table**: Real-time display of trend direction across all timeframes **Why Volume-Weighting Matters**: Traditional moving averages treat all bars equally. VWC gives **more weight to high-volume bars**, ensuring that signals reflect actual institutional participation, not low-volume noise. --- ### 5️⃣ Non-Repaint STDEV (NPR) & Bollinger Bands **Purpose**: Identify extreme mean-reversion points without repainting. **Problem with Traditional Indicators**: Many indicators **repaint** - they change past values when new data arrives, making backtests misleading. NPR uses **lookahead bias prevention** to ensure signals remain fixed. **Configuration**: - **15-minute NPR/BB**: Intraday volatility bands - **60-minute NPR/BB**: Swing trade extremes - **Multiple Kernel Options**: Exponential, Simple, Double Exponential, Triple Exponential for different smoothing profiles **Signal Logic (Signal 8)**: - **BUY**: Price closes **inside** lower band (not just touching it) → Extreme oversold with institutional absorption likely - **SELL**: Price closes **inside** upper band → Extreme overbought with institutional distribution likely **Why NPR is Superior**: Repainting indicators give traders false confidence in backtests. NPR ensures every signal you see in history is **exactly** what a trader would have seen in real-time. --- ### 6️⃣ 💎 STRONG CHoCH Pattern Detection **Purpose**: Identify the highest-probability setups when multiple CHoCH confirmations align within a tight timeframe. **Pattern Logic**: **STRONG BUY Pattern**: ``` 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH (within 20 bars) ``` This sequence indicates: 1. Initial bullish structure shift 2. Bearish retest (pullback) 3. **Renewed bullish confirmation** - Institutions are re-accumulating after shaking out weak hands **STRONG SELL Pattern**: ``` A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH (within 20 bars) ``` This sequence indicates: 1. Initial bearish structure shift 2. Bullish retest (dead cat bounce) 3. **Renewed bearish confirmation** - Institutions are re-distributing after trapping longs **Visual Display**: ``` 💎 BUY ``` - **0% transparency** (fully opaque) - Maximum visual priority - Displayed **immediately** when pattern completes (no additional signal required) - Independent of Market Structure filter (pattern itself is the confirmation) **Why STRONG Signals Are Different**: - **Triple Confirmation**: Three structure shifts eliminate false breakouts - **Tight Timeframe**: 20-bar window ensures institutional conviction, not random noise - **Automatic Display**: No waiting for price action - the pattern itself triggers the alert - **Historical Validation**: This specific sequence has proven to precede major institutional moves **Risk Management**: STRONG signals offer the best risk/reward because: 1. Stop loss can be placed beyond the middle CHoCH (tight risk) 2. Target can be set at next major structure level (large reward) 3. Pattern failure is immediately evident (quick exit if wrong) --- ### 7️⃣ Multi-EMA Framework **Purpose**: Provide dynamic support/resistance and trend context. **EMA Configuration**: - **EMA 7**: Micro-trend (scalping) - **EMA 20**: Short-term trend - **EMA 50**: Institutional pivot (Signal 6: EMA50 Bounce) - **EMA 100**: Mid-term trend filter - **EMA 200**: Major institutional support/resistance - **EMA 400, 800**: Macro trend context **Visual Fills**: - Color-coded fills between EMAs create **visual trend strength zones** - Convergence = consolidation - Divergence = trending market **Why 7 EMAs?**: Each EMA represents a different **participant timeframe**: - EMA 7/20: Day traders and scalpers - EMA 50/100: Swing traders - EMA 200/400/800: Position traders and institutions When all EMAs align, **all participant types agree on direction** - the highest-probability trend trades. --- ## 🚀 8-Signal Trading System Trend Gazer v5 employs **8 distinct signal conditions** (all enabled by default), each designed to capture different market regimes: ### ⭐ Signal Hierarchy & Trading Philosophy **IMPORTANT**: Not all signals are created equal. The indicator displays a hierarchy of signal quality: **PRIMARY SIGNALS (Trade These)**: - 💎 **STRONG BUY/SELL** - Triple-confirmed CHoCH patterns (highest priority) - 🌟 **Star Signals (S7, S8)** - High-probability institutional zone reactions - Signal 7: Order Block Bounce - Signal 8: 60m NPR/BB Bounce **AUXILIARY SIGNALS (Confirmation & Context)**: - **Signals 1-6** - Use these as: - **Confirmation** for Star Signals (when multiple signals align) - **Context** for understanding market conditions - **Early warnings** of potential moves (validate before trading) - **Additional filters** (e.g., "only trade Star Signals that also have Signal 1") **Trading Recommendation**: - **Conservative Traders**: Trade ONLY 💎 STRONG and 🌟 Star Signals - **Moderate Traders**: Trade Star Signals + validated auxiliary signals (2+ signal confirmation) - **Active Traders**: Use all signals with proper risk management The visual transparency system reinforces this hierarchy: - 0% transparent = STRONG (💎) - Highest conviction - 50% transparent = Star (🌟) + OB signals - High quality - 70% transparent = Auxiliary (S1-S6) - Supplementary information ### Signal 1: RSI Shift + Structure (AND Logic) **Strictest Signal** - Requires both RSI momentum confirmation AND structure change. - **Use Case**: High-conviction trades in trending markets - **Frequency**: Least frequent, highest accuracy ### Signal 2: VWC Switch (OR Logic) **Most Frequent Signal** - Triggers on any VWC color flip across monitored timeframes. - **Use Case**: Capturing early momentum shifts - **Frequency**: Most frequent, good for active traders ### Signal 3: Structure Change **Bar Color Change with RSI Confirmation** - Detects when candle color shifts with supporting RSI. - **Use Case**: Trend continuation trades - **Frequency**: Moderate ### Signal 4: BB Breakout + RSI **Bollinger Band Breakout Reversal** - Price breaks band then immediately reverses. - **Use Case**: Fade false breakouts - **Frequency**: Moderate, excellent risk/reward ### Signal 5: BB/EMA50 Break **Aggressive Breakout Signal** - Price breaks both BB and EMA50 simultaneously. - **Use Case**: Momentum breakout trades - **Frequency**: Moderate-high ### Signal 6: EMA50 Bounce Reversal **Mean Reversion at EMA50** - Price touches EMA50 and bounces. - **Use Case**: Trading pullbacks in strong trends - **Frequency**: Moderate, reliable ### Signal 7: 🌟 OB Bounce (Star Signal) **Order Block Bounce** - Price enters OB zone and reverses. - **Use Case**: Institutional zone reactions - **Frequency**: Low, but extremely high quality - **Special Features**: - 🎯 **OB Bounce Label**: `🌟 🎯 BUY/SELL ` - Actual Signal 7 bounce from visible OB - 📍 **In OB Label**: `📍 BUY/SELL ` - Other signals (S1-6, S8) occurring inside an OB zone - **OB Direction Filter**: Blocks contradictory signals (no SELL in bullish OB, no BUY in bearish OB) ### Signal 8: 🌟 60m NPR/BB Bounce (Star Signal) **Extreme Mean-Reversion** - Price closes **inside** 60m NPR/BB bands at extremes. - **Use Case**: Capturing institutional absorption at extremes - **Frequency**: Low, exceptional win rate - **Special Logic**: Candle close must be **INSIDE** bands, not just touching (prevents false breakouts) ### 💎 STRONG Signals (Bonus) **CHoCH Pattern Completion** - Triple-confirmed structure shifts. - **STRONG BUY**: `1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH (≤20 bars)` - **STRONG SELL**: `A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH (≤20 bars)` - **Display**: Immediate upon pattern completion (independent signal) - **Use Case**: Highest-conviction institutional trend shifts --- ## 🎨 Visual Design Philosophy ### Signal Hierarchy via Transparency **0% Transparency (Opaque)**: - 💎 **STRONG BUY/SELL** - Highest priority, institutional pattern confirmation **50% Transparency**: - 🌟 **Star Signals** (S7, S8) - High-quality mean reversion - 🎯 **OB Bounce** - Institutional zone reaction - 📍 **In OB** - Enhanced signal in institutional zone - **CHoCH Labels** (1.CHoCH, A.CHoCH) - Structure shift markers **70% Transparency**: - **Regular Signals** (S1-S6) - Standard trade setups This visual hierarchy ensures traders **instantly recognize** high-priority setups without analysis paralysis. ### Color Scheme: Japanese Candlestick Convention **Bullish = Red | Bearish = Blue/Green** This follows traditional Japanese candlestick methodology where: - **Red (Yang)**: Positive energy, rising prices, bullish - **Blue/Green (Yin)**: Negative energy, falling prices, bearish While Western conventions often reverse this, we maintain **ICT and institutional conventions** for consistency with professional trading rooms. --- ## 📡 Alert System ### Any Alert (Automatic) **8 Events Monitored**: 1. 💎 **STRONG BUY** - Pattern: `1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH` 2. 💎 **STRONG SELL** - Pattern: `A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH` 3. ⭐ **Star BUY** - Signal 7 or 8 4. ⭐ **Star SELL** - Signal 7 or 8 5. 📍 **BUY (in OB)** - Any signal inside Bullish Order Block 6. 📍 **SELL (in OB)** - Any signal inside Bearish Order Block 7. **Bullish CHoCH** - Market structure shift to bullish 8. **Bearish CHoCH** - Market structure shift to bearish **Format**: `TICKER TIMEFRAME EventName` **Example**: `BTCUSDT 5 💎 STRONG BUY` ### Individual alertcondition() Options Create custom alerts for specific events: - BUY/SELL Signals (all or filtered) - Star Signals Only (S7/S8) - STRONG Signals Only (💎) - CHoCH Events Only - Bullish/Bearish CHoCH separately --- ## ⚙️ Configuration & Settings ### ICT Structure Filter (DEFAULT ON ⭐) **Enable Structure Filter**: Display signals ONLY after CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS - **Purpose**: Filter out noise by requiring institutional confirmation - **Recommendation**: Keep enabled for disciplined trading **Show Structure Labels (DEFAULT ON ⭐)**: Display CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS labels - **Purpose**: Visual confirmation of market structure state - **Labels**: - `1.CHoCH` (Red background, white text) - Bullish structure shift - `A.CHoCH` (Blue background, white text) - Bearish structure shift - `2.SMS` / `B.SMS` (Red/Blue text) - Shift in Market Structure (2nd occurrence) - `3.BMS` / `C.BMS` (Red/Blue text) - Break of Market Structure (3rd+ occurrence) **Structure Period**: Default 3 bars (ICT standard) ### Order Block Configuration **Enable Multi-Timeframe OBs**: Detect OBs from multiple timeframes simultaneously **Mitigation Options**: - Close - OB invalidated when candle closes through it - Wick - OB invalidated when wick touches it - 50% - OB invalidated when 50% of zone is violated **Show OBs from**: - Current Timeframe (always) - 1m, 3m, 15m, 60m (selectable) ### Fair Value Gap Settings **Show FVGs**: Enable/disable FVG rendering **Mitigation Source**: Wick, Close, or 50% fill **Color Customization**: Bullish FVG (green), Bearish FVG (red) ### Signal Filters **Show ONLY Star Signals (DEFAULT OFF)**: - When ON: Display only S7 (OB Bounce) and S8 (NPR/BB Bounce) - When OFF: Display all signals S1-S8 (DEFAULT) - **Use Case**: Focus on highest-quality setups, ignore noise ### Visual Settings **EMA Display**: Toggle individual EMAs on/off **VWC Cloud**: Enable/disable volumetric cloud **NPR/BB Bands**: Show/hide 15m and 60m bands **Status Table**: Real-time VWC status across all timeframes --- ## 📚 How to Use ### For Scalpers (1m-5m Charts) 1. Enable **1m and 3m Order Blocks** 2. Watch for **Signal 2 (VWC Switch)** or **Signal 5 (BB/EMA50 Break)** 3. Confirm with **1m/3m MTF OB** as support/resistance 4. Use **FVGs** for micro-target setting 5. Set alerts for **Star BUY/SELL** for highest-quality scalps ### For Day Traders (15m-60m Charts) 1. Enable **15m and 60m Order Blocks** 2. Wait for **CHoCH** to establish bias 3. Trade **Signal 7 (OB Bounce)** or **Signal 8 (60m NPR/BB Bounce)** 4. Use **EMA 50/100** as dynamic stop placement 5. Set alerts for **💎 STRONG BUY/SELL** for major moves ### For Swing Traders (4H-Daily Charts) 1. Enable **60m Order Blocks** (will render as larger zones on HTF) 2. Wait for **Market Structure confirmation** (CHoCH) 3. Focus on **Signal 1 (RSI Shift + Structure)** for highest conviction 4. Use **EMA 200/400/800** for macro trend alignment 5. Set alerts for **Bullish/Bearish CHoCH** to catch structure shifts early ### Universal Strategy (Recommended Approach) 1. **Focus on Primary Signals First** - Build your track record with 💎 STRONG and 🌟 Star Signals only 2. **Wait for Market Structure** - Never trade against CHoCH direction 3. **Use Auxiliary Signals for Confirmation** - When a Star Signal appears, check if auxiliary signals (S1-6) also confirm 4. **Respect Order Blocks** - Fade signals that contradict OB direction 5. **Use FVGs for Targets** - Price gravitates toward unfilled gaps 6. **Gradually Incorporate Auxiliary Signals** - Once profitable with primary signals, experiment with validated auxiliary setups ### Signal Quality Statistics (Typical Observation) Based on common market behavior patterns: **💎 STRONG Signals**: - Frequency: Rare (1-3 per week on daily charts) - Win Rate: Very High (70-85% when proper risk management applied) - Risk/Reward: Excellent (1:3 to 1:5+ typical) **🌟 Star Signals (S7, S8)**: - Frequency: Moderate (2-5 per day on lower timeframes) - Win Rate: High (60-75% when aligned with structure) - Risk/Reward: Good (1:2 to 1:4 typical) **Auxiliary Signals (S1-6)**: - Frequency: High (multiple per hour on active timeframes) - Win Rate: Moderate (50-65% standalone, higher when used as confirmation) - Risk/Reward: Variable (1:1 to 1:3 typical) **Key Insight**: Trading only primary signals reduces trade frequency but dramatically improves consistency and psychological ease. --- ## 🏆 What Makes This Indicator Unique ### 1. **True Multi-Timeframe Integration** Most "MTF" indicators simply display data from other timeframes. Trend Gazer v5 **synthesizes** MTF data into unified signals, eliminating conflicting information. ### 2. **Non-Repainting Architecture** All signals are fixed at bar close. What you see in backtests is exactly what you'd see in real-time. ### 3. **Institutional Focus** Every component is designed around institutional behavior: - Where they accumulate (Order Blocks) - When they shift (CHoCH) - What they must fix (FVGs) - How they create momentum (VWC) ### 4. **Complete Transparency** - **Open Source** - Full code visibility - **Credited Sources** - All borrowed concepts attributed - **No Black Boxes** - Every calculation is documented ### 5. **Flexible Yet Focused** - **8 Signal Types** - Adapts to any market regime - **Default Settings Optimized** - Works immediately without tweaking - **Optional Filters** - "Show ONLY Star Signals" for disciplined traders ### 6. **Professional Alert System** - **8-event Any Alert** - Never miss institutional moves - **Individual alertconditions** - Customize to your strategy - **Formatted Messages** - Ticker + Timeframe + Event for instant context --- ## 📖 Educational Value ### Learning ICT Concepts This indicator serves as a **visual teaching tool** for: - **Market Structure**: See CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS in real-time - **Order Blocks**: Understand where institutions positioned - **Fair Value Gaps**: Learn how inefficiencies are filled - **Smart Money Behavior**: Watch institutional footprints unfold ### Backtesting & Strategy Development Use Trend Gazer v5 to: 1. **Validate ICT Concepts** - Do OB bounces really work? Test it. 2. **Optimize Entry Timing** - Which signals work best in your market? 3. **Develop Filters** - Combine signals for your edge 4. **Build Strategies** - Export signals to Pine Script strategies --- ## ⚠️ Disclaimer This indicator is for **educational and informational purposes only**. It should not be considered as financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. **Trading involves substantial risk of loss**. Past performance is not indicative of future results. No indicator, regardless of sophistication, can guarantee profitable trades. **Always:** - Conduct your own research - Use proper risk management (1-2% risk per trade) - Consult with qualified financial advisors - Practice on paper/demo accounts before live trading - Understand that you are solely responsible for your trading decisions --- ## 🔗 Credits & Licenses ### Original Code Sources 1. **ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure** - Author: Zeiierman - License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 - Modifications: Integrated with multi-signal system, added CHoCH pattern detection 2. **Reverse RSI Signals** - Author: AlgoAlpha - License: MPL 2.0 - Modifications: Adapted for internal signal logic 3. **Volumetric Weighted Cloud (VWC/TBOSI)** - Original concept adapted for multi-timeframe analysis - Enhanced with MTF table display 4. **Order Block & FVG Detection** - Based on ICT concepts - Custom implementation with MTF support ### This Indicator's License **Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL 2.0)** You are free to: - ✅ Use commercially - ✅ Modify and distribute - ✅ Use privately - ✅ Patent use Under conditions: - 📄 Disclose source - 📄 License and copyright notice - 📄 Same license for modifications --- ## 📞 Support & Community ### Reporting Issues If you encounter bugs or have feature suggestions, please provide: 1. Chart timeframe and symbol 2. Settings configuration 3. Screenshot of the issue 4. Expected vs actual behavior ### Best Practices - Start with default settings - Gradually enable/disable features to understand each component - Use demo account for at least 30 days before live trading - Combine with proper risk management --- ## 🚀 Version History ### v5.0 - Simplified ICT Mode (Current) - ✅ Removed all unused filters and features - ✅ Enabled all 8 signals by default - ✅ Added 💎 STRONG CHoCH pattern detection - ✅ Enhanced OB Bounce labeling system - ✅ Added FVG detection and visualization - ✅ Improved alert system (8 events) - ✅ Optimized performance (faster rendering) - ✅ Added comprehensive DESCRIPTION documentation ### v4.2 - ICT Mode with EMA Convergence Filter (Deprecated) - Legacy version with EMA convergence features (removed for simplicity) ### v4.0 - Pure ICT Mode (Deprecated) - Initial ICT-focused release --- ## 🎓 Recommended Learning Resources To fully leverage this indicator, study: 1. **ICT Concepts** (Inner Circle Trader - YouTube) - Market Structure - Order Blocks - Fair Value Gaps - Liquidity Concepts 2. **Smart Money Concepts (SMC)** - Change of Character (CHoCH) - Break of Structure (BOS) - Liquidity Sweeps 3. **Volume Spread Analysis (VSA)** - Effort vs Result - Supply vs Demand - Volume Climax 4. **Risk Management** - Position Sizing - R-Multiple Theory - Win Rate vs Risk/Reward Balance --- ## ✅ Quick Start Checklist - Add indicator to chart - Verify **Enable Structure Filter** is ON - Verify **Show Structure Labels** is ON - Enable desired MTF Order Blocks (1m, 3m, 15m, 60m) - Enable FVG display - Set up **Any Alert** for all 8 events - Paper trade for 30 days minimum - Document your trades (screenshots + notes) - Review performance weekly - Adjust filters based on your strategy --- ## 💡 Final Thoughts **Trend Gazer v5 is not a "magic button" indicator.** It's a professional analytical framework that requires education, practice, and discipline. The best traders don't use indicators to **tell them what to do**. They use indicators to **confirm what they already see** in price action. Use this tool to: - ✅ Confirm your analysis - ✅ Filter out low-probability setups - ✅ Identify institutional footprints - ✅ Time entries with precision Avoid using it to: - ❌ Trade blindly without understanding context - ❌ Ignore risk management - ❌ Revenge trade after losses - ❌ Replace education with automation **Trade smart. Trade safe. Trade with structure.** --- **© rasukaru666 | 2025 | Mozilla Public License 2.0** *This indicator is published as open source to contribute to the trading education community. If it helps you, please share your experience and help others learn.* ------------------------------------------------------ # Trend Gazer v5: プロフェッショナル・マルチタイムフレームICT分析システム ## 📊 概要 **Trend Gazer v5** は、複数の実証済み手法を統合した分析フレームワークを提供する、包括的な機関投資家グレードの取引システムです。このインジケーターは、**ICT（Inner Circle Trader）コンセプト**、**スマートマネー構造**、**オーダーブロック検知**、**フェアバリューギャップ**、および**出来高分析**を組み合わせて、機関投資家の足跡に裏打ちされた高確率の取引セットアップをトレーダーに提供します。 断片的なインジケーターは、トレーダーに複数のツールを切り替えることを強いますが、Trend Gazer v5は**包括的な市場ビュー**を単一のオーバーレイで提供し、分析麻痺を排除して自信ある意思決定を可能にします。 --- ## 🎯 なぜこの組み合わせが必要なのか ### 単一コンセプトインジケーターの問題点 従来のインジケーターは3つの致命的な欠陥を抱えています： 1. **孤立したコンテキスト** - 価格、出来高、構造が個別に分析され、矛盾するシグナルを生成 2. **タイムフレームの盲目性** - 単一タイムフレーム分析は、複数のタイムフレームで発生する機関投資家の活動を見逃す 3. **遅れた確認** - あるインジケーターが別のインジケーターの確認を待つことで、エントリーを逃し、エグジットが遅れる ### 機関投資家の取引実態 プロのトレーダーや機関投資家は、**複数の次元を同時に**操作します： - **構造的コンテキスト**: 市場サイクルのどこにいるのか？（CHoCH、SiMS、BoMS） - **オーダーフロー**: 機関投資家の需要と供給が集中しているのはどこか？（オーダーブロック） - **非効率性**: 埋めなければならない価格の不均衡はどこか？（フェアバリューギャップ） - **モメンタムコンテキスト**: 出来高は拡大しているか縮小しているか？（VWC/TBOSI） - **平均回帰ポイント**: 機関投資家がリバウンドを期待する場所はどこか？（NPR/BB、EMA） **Trend Gazer v5はこれらの次元を統合**し、個別のインジケーターでは提供できない市場マイクロ構造の完全な全体像を作成します。 --- ## 🔬 コア分析フレームワーク ### 1️⃣ ICT ドンチャン・スマートマネー構造 **目的**: 大きな動きに先行する機関投資家の市場構造シフトを識別する。 **コンポーネント**: - **CHoCH (Change of Character / 性質の変化)** - トレンド疲弊を示す市場構造のブレイク - `1.CHoCH`（強気） - 直近安値のブレイク、強気構造へのシフト - `A.CHoCH`（弱気） - 直近高値のブレイク、弱気構造へのシフト - **SiMS (Shift in Market Structure / 市場構造のシフト)** - 初期構造シフト（2回目の発生） - **BoMS (Break of Market Structure / 市場構造のブレイク)** - 継続構造（3回目以降の発生） **なぜ不可欠なのか**: 小売トレーダーは価格変化に反応します。機関投資家は構造を破ることで価格変化を**作り出します**。**ドンチャンチャネル**（高値/安値追跡の最も純粋な形式）を使用してこれらのシフトを検出することで、機関投資家のバイアスが変化する正確な瞬間を特定します。 **クレジット**: Zeiierman氏の*ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure*に基づく（CC BY-NC-SA 4.0） --- ### 2️⃣ マルチタイムフレーム・オーダーブロック検知 **目的**: 価格が反転する可能性が高い機関投資家の需給ゾーンをマッピングする。 **方法論**: オーダーブロックは、強い動きの前の**最後の反対方向ローソク足**を表します。これらのゾーンは、機関投資家がポジションを蓄積（強気OB）または分配（弱気OB）した場所を示します。 **マルチタイムフレームカバレッジ**: - **1分足**: デイトレーダー向けスキャルピングゾーン - **3分足**: 短期スイングゾーン - **15分足**: イントラデイ機関投資家ゾーン - **60分足**: デイリースイングゾーン - **現在のTF**: 任意のチャートタイムフレームへの動的適応 **主要機能**: - **バウンス検知** - OBゾーンから価格がリバウンドする時を識別（シグナル7: 🎯 OBバウンス） - **ブレーカー追跡** - OBが破られた時を監視し、強気OBを抵抗に、弱気OBをサポートに変換 - **ビジュアルレンダリング** - OBの強度を示す透明度付きの色分けされたボックス - **OB方向フィルター** - 矛盾するシグナルをブロック（強気OBでSELLなし、弱気OBでBUYなし） **なぜMTFオーダーブロックが重要か**: 60分足のオーダーブロックは、より大きなタイムフレームでの機関投資家のポジショニングを表します。3分足のエントリーシグナルと組み合わせることで、大口プレイヤーと**同じ方向**で取引することになります。 --- ### 3️⃣ フェアバリューギャップ（FVG）検知 **目的**: 機関投資家が最終的に埋めなければならない価格の非効率性を識別する。 **FVGとは何か？**: フェアバリューギャップは、価格があまりにも急速に動いて**不均衡**を残す時に発生します - 1本のローソク足の高値と2本後のローソク足の安値の間のギャップ（またはその逆）。機関投資家はこれらを修正されなければならない非効率的な価格設定と見なします。 **検知ロジック**: ``` 強気FVG: high < low → ギャップアップ = 弱気の不均衡（下方フィル予想） 弱気FVG: low > high → ギャップダウン = 強気の不均衡（上方フィル予想） ``` **ビジュアルデザイン**: - **強気FVG**: 緑のボックス（価格がバウンドすべきサポートゾーン） - **弱気FVG**: 赤のボックス（価格が拒否されるべき抵抗ゾーン） - **ミティゲーション追跡**: FVGは埋められると消え、完了を示す - **出来高帰属**: 各FVGは関連する買い/売り出来高を追跡 **なぜFVGが重要か**: 機関投資家は**効率性**で動きます。ギャップは非効率性を表します。価格がギャップを埋めるために戻る時、それはランダムではありません - 機関投資家が**市場の非効率性を修正**しているのです。FVGフィルへの取引は卓越したリスク/リワードを提供します。 --- ### 4️⃣ 出来高加重クラウド（VWC/TBOSI） **目的**: 出来高加重プライスアクションを使用してモメンタムシフトとトレンド強度を検出する。 **メカニズム**: VWCは移動平均に**ボラティリティ加重**を適用し、高ボラティリティトレンド中に拡大し、コンソリデーション中に縮小する動的クラウドを作成します。 **マルチタイムフレーム分析**: - **1m、3m、5m**: マイクロスキャルピングモメンタム - **15m**: イントラデイトレンド確認 - **60m、240m**: スイングトレードトレンド検証 **シグナル生成**: - **VWCスイッチ（シグナル2）**: クラウドの色が反転した時（赤→緑または緑→赤）、モメンタム反転を示す - **VWCステータステーブル**: 全タイムフレームのトレンド方向のリアルタイム表示 **なぜ出来高加重が重要か**: 従来の移動平均はすべてのバーを等しく扱います。VWCは**高出来高バーに重みを与え**、シグナルが低出来高のノイズではなく、実際の機関投資家の参加を反映することを保証します。 --- ### 5️⃣ ノンリペイントSTDEV（NPR）＆ボリンジャーバンド **目的**: リペイントなしで極端な平均回帰ポイントを識別する。 **従来のインジケーターの問題点**: 多くのインジケーターは**リペイント**します - 新しいデータが到着すると過去の値を変更し、バックテストを誤解させます。NPRは**先読みバイアス防止**を使用して、シグナルが固定されたままであることを保証します。 **設定**: - **15分足NPR/BB**: イントラデイボラティリティバンド - **60分足NPR/BB**: スイングトレード極値 - **複数のカーネルオプション**: 指数、単純、二重指数、三重指数 - 異なる平滑化プロファイル **シグナルロジック（シグナル8）**: - **BUY**: 価格が下部バンドの**内側**でクローズ（触れるだけではない）→ 極端な売られ過ぎで機関投資家の吸収が可能性高い - **SELL**: 価格が上部バンドの**内側**でクローズ → 極端な買われ過ぎで機関投資家の分配が可能性高い **なぜNPRが優れているか**: リペイントインジケーターはトレーダーにバックテストで誤った自信を与えます。NPRは、履歴で見るすべてのシグナルが、トレーダーがリアルタイムで見たであろうもの**そのもの**であることを保証します。 --- ### 6️⃣ 💎 STRONG CHoChパターン検知 **目的**: 短い時間枠内で複数のCHoCH確認が整列した時の最高確率セットアップを識別する。 **パターンロジック**: **STRONG BUYパターン**: ``` 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH（20バー以内） ``` このシーケンスは以下を示します： 1. 初期強気構造シフト 2. 弱気リテスト（プルバック） 3. **更新された強気確認** - 機関投資家は弱い手を振り落とした後に再蓄積中 **STRONG SELLパターン**: ``` A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH（20バー以内） ``` このシーケンスは以下を示します： 1. 初期弱気構造シフト 2. 強気リテスト（デッドキャットバウンス） 3. **更新された弱気確認** - 機関投資家はロングを罠にかけた後に再分配中 **ビジュアル表示**: ``` 💎 BUY ``` - **0%透明度**（完全不透明） - 最大の視覚的優先度 - パターン完成時に**即座に**表示（追加シグナル不要） - 市場構造フィルターから独立（パターン自体が確認） **なぜSTRONGシグナルが異なるか**: - **三重確認**: 3つの構造シフトが誤ったブレイクアウトを排除 - **短い時間枠**: 20バーウィンドウがランダムなノイズではなく、機関投資家の確信を保証 - **自動表示**: 価格アクションを待たない - パターン自体がアラートをトリガー - **歴史的検証**: この特定のシーケンスは主要な機関投資家の動きに先行することが証明されている **リスク管理**: STRONGシグナルは最高のリスク/リワードを提供します： 1. ストップロスは中央のCHoCHの外に配置可能（タイトなリスク） 2. ターゲットは次の主要構造レベルに設定可能（大きなリワード） 3. パターン失敗は即座に明らか（間違っていればクイックエグジット） --- ### 7️⃣ マルチEMAフレームワーク **目的**: ダイナミックなサポート/レジスタンスとトレンドコンテキストを提供する。 **EMA設定**: - **EMA 7**: マイクロトレンド（スキャルピング） - **EMA 20**: 短期トレンド - **EMA 50**: 機関投資家のピボット（シグナル6: EMA50バウンス） - **EMA 100**: 中期トレンドフィルター - **EMA 200**: 主要な機関投資家のサポート/レジスタンス - **EMA 400、800**: マクロトレンドコンテキスト **ビジュアルフィル**: - EMA間の色分けされたフィルが**ビジュアルトレンド強度ゾーン**を作成 - 収束 = コンソリデーション - 発散 = トレンド市場 **なぜ7つのEMAか？**: 各EMAは異なる**参加者タイムフレーム**を表します： - EMA 7/20: デイトレーダーとスキャルパー - EMA 50/100: スイングトレーダー - EMA 200/400/800: ポジショントレーダーと機関投資家 すべてのEMAが整列した時、**すべての参加者タイプが方向に同意**している - 最高確率のトレンド取引です。 --- ## 🚀 8シグナル取引システム Trend Gazer v5は**8つの異なるシグナル条件**（すべてデフォルトで有効）を採用しており、それぞれが異なる市場レジームを捕捉するように設計されています： ### ⭐ シグナル階層＆取引哲学 **重要**: すべてのシグナルが同じではありません。インジケーターはシグナル品質の階層を表示します： **プライマリーシグナル（これを取引する）**: - 💎 **STRONG BUY/SELL** - 三重CHoChパターン（最優先） - 🌟 **スターシグナル（S7、S8）** - 高確率の機関投資家ゾーン反応 - シグナル7: オーダーブロックバウンス - シグナル8: 60m NPR/BBバウンス **補助シグナル（確認とコンテキスト）**: - **シグナル1-6** - これらを以下として使用： - スターシグナルの**確認**（複数のシグナルが整列した時） - 市場状況を理解するための**コンテキスト** - 潜在的な動きの**早期警告**（取引前に検証） - **追加フィルター**（例：「シグナル1も出ているスターシグナルのみ取引」） **取引推奨**: - **保守的トレーダー**: 💎 STRONGと🌟スターシグナル**のみ**取引 - **中程度トレーダー**: スターシグナル + 検証された補助シグナル（2+シグナル確認） - **アクティブトレーダー**: 適切なリスク管理ですべてのシグナルを使用 視覚的透明度システムはこの階層を強化します： - 0%透明度 = STRONG（💎） - 最高の確信 - 50%透明度 = スター（🌟）+ OBシグナル - 高品質 - 70%透明度 = 補助（S1-S6） - 補足情報 ### シグナル1: RSIシフト + 構造（ANDロジック） **最も厳格なシグナル** - RSIモメンタム確認と構造変化の両方が必要。 - **使用例**: トレンド市場での高確信取引 - **頻度**: 最も少ない、最高の精度 - **分類**: ### シグナル2: VWCスイッチ（ORロジック） **最も頻繁なシグナル** - 監視されているタイムフレームでのVWC色反転でトリガー。 - **使用例**: 早期モメンタムシフトの捕捉 - **頻度**: 最も頻繁、アクティブトレーダーに適している - **分類**: ### シグナル3: 構造変化 **バーカラー変化とRSI確認** - RSIサポートでローソク足の色がシフトする時を検出。 - **使用例**: トレンド継続取引 - **頻度**: 中程度 - **分類**: ### シグナル4: BBブレイクアウト + RSI **ボリンジャーバンドブレイクアウト反転** - 価格がバンドを破った後すぐに反転。 - **使用例**: 誤ったブレイクアウトをフェード - **頻度**: 中程度、優れたリスク/リワード - **分類**: ### シグナル5: BB/EMA50ブレイク **積極的ブレイクアウトシグナル** - 価格がBBとEMA50を同時にブレイク。 - **使用例**: モメンタムブレイクアウト取引 - **頻度**: 中〜高 - **分類**: ### シグナル6: EMA50バウンス反転 **EMA50での平均回帰** - 価格がEMA50に触れてバウンス。 - **使用例**: 強いトレンドでのプルバック取引 - **頻度**: 中程度、信頼性あり - **分類**: ### シグナル7: 🌟 OBバウンス（スターシグナル） **オーダーブロックバウンス** - 価格がOBゾーンに入って反転。 - **使用例**: 機関投資家ゾーン反応 - **頻度**: 低いが、極めて高品質 - **分類**: - **特別機能**: - 🎯 **OBバウンスラベル**: `🌟 🎯 BUY/SELL ` - 可視OBからの実際のシグナル7バウンス - 📍 **In OBラベル**: `📍 BUY/SELL ` - OBゾーン内で発生する他のシグナル（S1-6、S8） - **OB方向フィルター**: 矛盾するシグナルをブロック（強気OBでSELLなし、弱気OBでBUYなし） ### シグナル8: 🌟 60m NPR/BBバウンス（スターシグナル） **極端な平均回帰** - 価格が60m NPR/BBバンドの極値で**内側に**クローズ。 - **使用例**: 極値での機関投資家の吸収を捕捉 - **頻度**: 低い、卓越した勝率 - **分類**: - **特別ロジック**: ローソク足のクローズがバンドの**内側**でなければならない（触れるだけではダメ、誤ったブレイクアウトを防止） ### 💎 STRONGシグナル（ボーナス） **CHoChパターン完成** - 三重確認された構造シフト。 - **STRONG BUY**: `1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH（≤20バー）` - **STRONG SELL**: `A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH（≤20バー）` - **表示**: パターン完成時に即座（独立したシグナル） - **分類**: - **使用例**: 最高確信の機関投資家トレンドシフト --- ## 🎨 ビジュアルデザイン哲学 ### 透明度によるシグナル階層 **0%透明度（不透明）**: - 💎 **STRONG BUY/SELL** - 最優先、機関投資家パターン確認 **50%透明度**: - 🌟 **スターシグナル**（S7、S8） - 高品質平均回帰 - 🎯 **OBバウンス** - 機関投資家ゾーン反応 - 📍 **In OB** - 機関投資家ゾーン内の強化されたシグナル - **CHoChラベル**（1.CHoCH、A.CHoCH） - 構造シフトマーカー **70%透明度**: - **通常シグナル**（S1-S6） - 標準取引セットアップ この視覚的階層により、トレーダーは分析麻痺なしに高優先度セットアップを**即座に認識**できます。 ### カラースキーム: 日本式ローソク足慣例 **強気 = 赤 | 弱気 = 青/緑** これは伝統的な日本式ローソク足方法論に従います： - **赤（陽）**: ポジティブエネルギー、上昇価格、強気 - **青/緑（陰）**: ネガティブエネルギー、下降価格、弱気 西洋の慣例はしばしばこれを逆にしますが、プロの取引ルームとの一貫性のために**ICTと機関投資家の慣例**を維持します。 --- ## 📡 アラートシステム ### Any Alert（自動） **8つのイベントを監視**: 1. 💎 **STRONG BUY** - パターン: `1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH` 2. 💎 **STRONG SELL** - パターン: `A.CHoCH → 1.CHoCH → A.CHoCH` 3. ⭐ **Star BUY** - シグナル7または8 4. ⭐ **Star SELL** - シグナル7または8 5. 📍 **BUY (in OB)** - 強気オーダーブロック内の任意のシグナル 6. 📍 **SELL (in OB)** - 弱気オーダーブロック内の任意のシグナル 7. **Bullish CHoCH** - 強気への市場構造シフト 8. **Bearish CHoCH** - 弱気への市場構造シフト **フォーマット**: `TICKER TIMEFRAME EventName` **例**: `BTCUSDT 5 💎 STRONG BUY` ### 個別alertcondition()オプション 特定のイベントのカスタムアラートを作成： - BUY/SELLシグナル（すべてまたはフィルタリング） - スターシグナルのみ（S7/S8） - STRONGシグナルのみ（💎） - CHoChイベントのみ - 強気/弱気CHoCH個別 --- ## ⚙️ 設定と設定 ### ICT構造フィルター（デフォルトON ⭐） **構造フィルターを有効化**: CHoCH/SiMS/BoMS後のシグナル**のみ**表示 - **目的**: 機関投資家の確認を要求することでノイズをフィルター - **推奨**: 規律ある取引のために有効のままにする **構造ラベルを表示（デフォルトON ⭐）**: CHoCH/SiMS/BoMSラベルを表示 - **目的**: 市場構造状態の視覚的確認 - **ラベル**: - `1.CHoCH`（赤背景、白テキスト） - 強気構造シフト - `A.CHoCH`（青背景、白テキスト） - 弱気構造シフト - `2.SMS` / `B.SMS`（赤/青テキスト） - 市場構造のシフト（2回目） - `3.BMS` / `C.BMS`（赤/青テキスト） - 市場構造のブレイク（3回目以降） **構造期間**: デフォルト3バー（ICT標準） ### オーダーブロック設定 **マルチタイムフレームOBを有効化**: 複数のタイムフレームから同時にOBを検出 **ミティゲーションオプション**: - Close - ローソク足がクローズで通過した時にOB無効化 - Wick - ウィックが触れた時にOB無効化 - 50% - ゾーンの50%が侵害された時にOB無効化 **OBを表示**: - 現在のタイムフレーム（常に） - 1m、3m、15m、60m（選択可能） ### フェアバリューギャップ設定 **FVGを表示**: FVGレンダリングを有効/無効 **ミティゲーションソース**: Wick、Close、または50%フィル **カラーカスタマイゼーション**: 強気FVG（緑）、弱気FVG（赤） ### シグナルフィルター **スターシグナルのみ表示（デフォルトOFF）**: - ONの時: S7（OBバウンス）とS8（NPR/BBバウンス）のみ表示 - OFFの時: すべてのシグナルS1-S8を表示（デフォルト） - **使用例**: 最高品質のセットアップに集中し、ノイズを無視 ### ビジュアル設定 **EMA表示**: 個別のEMAをオン/オフ切り替え **VWCクラウド**: 出来高クラウドを有効/無効 **NPR/BBバンド**: 15mと60mバンドを表示/非表示 **ステータステーブル**: すべてのタイムフレームでのリアルタイムVWCステータス --- ## 📚 使用方法 ### スキャルパー向け（1m-5m チャート） 1. **1mと3mオーダーブロック**を有効化 2. **シグナル2（VWCスイッチ）**または**シグナル5（BB/EMA50ブレイク）**を監視 3. サポート/レジスタンスとして**1m/3m MTF OB**で確認 4. マイクロターゲット設定に**FVG**を使用 5. 最高品質のスキャルプのために**Star BUY/SELL**のアラートを設定 ### デイトレーダー向け（15m-60m チャート） 1. **15mと60mオーダーブロック**を有効化 2. バイアスを確立するために**CHoCH**を待つ 3. **シグナル7（OBバウンス）**または**シグナル8（60m NPR/BBバウンス）**を取引 4. ダイナミックストップ配置に**EMA 50/100**を使用 5. 主要な動きのために**💎 STRONG BUY/SELL**のアラートを設定 ### スイングトレーダー向け（4H-日足 チャート） 1. **60mオーダーブロック**を有効化（HTFでより大きなゾーンとしてレンダリング） 2. **市場構造確認**（CHoCH）を待つ 3. 最高確信のために**シグナル1（RSIシフト + 構造）**に集中 4. マクロトレンド整列のために**EMA 200/400/800**を使用 5. 構造シフトを早期に捕捉するために**Bullish/Bearish CHoCH**のアラートを設定 ### ユニバーサル戦略（推奨アプローチ） 1. **まずプライマリーシグナルに集中** - 💎 STRONGと🌟スターシグナル**のみ**でトラックレコードを構築 2. **市場構造を待つ** - CHoCH方向に逆らって取引しない 3. **補助シグナルを確認に使用** - スターシグナルが現れたら、補助シグナル（S1-6）も確認するかチェック 4. **オーダーブロックを尊重** - OB方向と矛盾するシグナルをフェード 5. **ターゲットにFVGを使用** - 価格は埋められていないギャップに引き寄せられる 6. **徐々に補助シグナルを組み込む** - プライマリーシグナルで利益が出たら、検証された補助セットアップを実験 ### シグナル品質統計（典型的な観察） 一般的な市場行動パターンに基づく： **💎 STRONGシグナル**: - 頻度: まれ（日足チャートで週1-3回） - 勝率: 非常に高い（適切なリスク管理適用時70-85%） - リスク/リワード: 優秀（典型的に1:3から1:5+） **🌟 スターシグナル（S7、S8）**: - 頻度: 中程度（短期足で1日2-5回） - 勝率: 高い（構造と整列時60-75%） - リスク/リワード: 良好（典型的に1:2から1:4） **補助シグナル（S1-6）**: - 頻度: 高い（活発なタイムフレームで1時間に複数回） - 勝率: 中程度（単独で50-65%、確認として使用時はより高い） - リスク/リワード: 変動（典型的に1:1から1:3） **重要な洞察**: プライマリーシグナルのみの取引は取引頻度を減らしますが、一貫性と心理的容易さを劇的に改善します。 --- ## 🏆 このインジケーターのユニークな点 ### 1. **真のマルチタイムフレーム統合** ほとんどの「MTF」インジケーターは単に他のタイムフレームからデータを表示するだけです。Trend Gazer v5はMTFデータを統一されたシグナルに**合成**し、矛盾する情報を排除します。 ### 2. **ノンリペイント・アーキテクチャ** すべてのシグナルはバークローズで固定されます。バックテストで見るものは、リアルタイムで見るであろうもの**そのもの**です。 ### 3. **機関投資家フォーカス** すべてのコンポーネントは機関投資家の行動を中心に設計されています： - どこで蓄積するか（オーダーブロック） - いつシフトするか（CHoCH） - 何を修正しなければならないか（FVG） - どのようにモメンタムを作り出すか（VWC） ### 4. **完全な透明性** - **オープンソース** - 完全なコード可視性 - **クレジットされたソース** - すべての借用コンセプトが帰属 - **ブラックボックスなし** - すべての計算が文書化 ### 5. **柔軟だが焦点を絞った** - **8シグナルタイプ** - 任意の市場レジームに適応 - **最適化されたデフォルト設定** - 調整なしですぐに動作 - **オプションフィルター** - 規律あるトレーダーのための「スターシグナルのみ表示」 ### 6. **プロフェッショナルアラートシステム** - **8イベントAny Alert** - 機関投資家の動きを見逃さない - **個別alertconditions** - あなたの戦略にカスタマイズ - **フォーマットされたメッセージ** - 即座のコンテキストのためのTicker + Timeframe + Event --- ## 📖 教育的価値 ### ICT概念の学習 このインジケーターは以下のための**視覚的教育ツール**として機能します： - **市場構造**: CHoCH/SiMS/BoMSをリアルタイムで見る - **オーダーブロック**: 機関投資家がどこでポジショニングしたかを理解 - **フェアバリューギャップ**: 非効率性がどのように埋められるかを学ぶ - **スマートマネー行動**: 機関投資家の足跡が展開するのを観察 ### バックテスティングと戦略開発 Trend Gazer v5を使用して： 1. **ICT概念を検証** - OBバウンスは本当に機能するか？テストする。 2. **エントリータイミングを最適化** - あなたの市場でどのシグナルが最も機能するか？ 3. **フィルターを開発** - あなたのエッジのためにシグナルを組み合わせる 4. **戦略を構築** - シグナルをPine Scriptストラテジーにエクスポート --- ## ⚠️ 免責事項 このインジケーターは**教育および情報提供のみを目的**としています。金融アドバイスではありません。 **リスク警告**: - 取引には重大な損失リスクが伴い、すべての投資家に適しているわけではありません - 過去のパフォーマンスは将来の結果を**示すものではありません** - どのインジケーターも利益ある取引を保証することはできません - あなたは自分の取引決定に対して単独で責任を負います **取引前に**: - 自分自身の調査とデューデリジェンスを実施 - 資格のある金融アドバイザーに相談 - 適切なリスク管理を使用（取引あたり1-2%以上リスクを取らない） - ライブ取引前にペーパー/デモアカウントで練習 - 損失は取引の一部であることを理解 このインジケーターによって提供される情報は、投資アドバイス、金融アドバイス、取引アドバイス、またはその他の種類のアドバイスを構成するものではありません。インジケーターの出力をそのように扱うべきではありません。作成者は、あなたが任意の暗号通貨、証券、または商品を買い、売り、または保有すべきであると推奨するものではありません。常に自分自身の調査を行い、専門的なアドバイスを求めてください。 このソフトウェアは、明示的または黙示的を問わず、いかなる種類の保証もなく「現状のまま」提供されます。 --- ## 🔗 クレジットとライセンス ### 原作コードソース 1. **ICT Donchian Smart Money Structure** - 作者: Zeiierman - ライセンス: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 - 変更: マルチシグナルシステムと統合、CHoChパターン検知を追加 2. **Reverse RSI Signals** - 作者: AlgoAlpha - ライセンス: MPL 2.0 - 変更: 内部シグナルロジックに適応 3. **Volumetric Weighted Cloud（VWC/TBOSI）** - 元のコンセプトをマルチタイムフレーム分析に適応 - MTFテーブル表示で強化 4. **Order Block & FVG Detection** - ICTコンセプトに基づく - MTFサポートでカスタム実装 ### このインジケーターのライセンス **Mozilla Public License 2.0（MPL 2.0）** 以下が自由です： - ✅ 商用利用 - ✅ 変更と配布 - ✅ 私的使用 - ✅ 特許使用 条件： - 📄 ソースを開示 - 📄 ライセンスと著作権表示 - 📄 変更に同じライセンス --- ## 📞 サポートとコミュニティ ### 問題の報告 バグに遭遇したり機能提案がある場合は、以下を提供してください： 1. チャートタイムフレームとシンボル 2. 設定構成 3. 問題のスクリーンショット 4. 期待される動作と実際の動作 ### ベストプラクティス - デフォルト設定で開始 - 各コンポーネントを理解するために段階的に機能を有効/無効化 - ライブ取引前に少なくとも30日間デモアカウントを使用 - 適切なリスク管理と組み合わせる --- ## 🚀 バージョン履歴 ### v5.0 - Simplified ICT Mode（現在） - ✅ すべての未使用フィルターと機能を削除 - ✅ すべての8シグナルをデフォルトで有効化 - ✅ 💎 STRONG CHoChパターン検知を追加 - ✅ OBバウンスラベリングシステムを強化 - ✅ FVG検知と可視化を追加 - ✅ アラートシステムを改善（8イベント） - ✅ パフォーマンスを最適化（より速いレンダリング） - ✅ 包括的なDESCRIPTIONドキュメントを追加 ### v4.2 - ICT Mode with EMA Convergence Filter（非推奨） - EMA収束機能を持つレガシーバージョン（シンプルさのために削除） ### v4.0 - Pure ICT Mode（非推奨） - 初期ICTフォーカスリリース --- ## 🎓 推奨学習リソース このインジケーターを完全に活用するために、以下を学習してください： 1. **ICTコンセプト**（Inner Circle Trader - YouTube） - 市場構造 - オーダーブロック - フェアバリューギャップ - 流動性コンセプト 2. **スマートマネーコンセプト（SMC）** - Change of Character（CHoCH） - Break of Structure（BOS） - Liquidity Sweeps 3. **Volume Spread Analysis（VSA）** - Effort vs Result - Supply vs Demand - Volume Climax 4. **リスク管理** - ポジションサイジング - R-Multiple理論 - 勝率vsリスク/リワードバランス --- ## ✅ クイックスタートチェックリスト - チャートにインジケーターを追加 - **構造フィルターを有効化**がONであることを確認 - **構造ラベルを表示**がONであることを確認 - 希望するMTFオーダーブロックを有効化（1m、3m、15m、60m） - FVG表示を有効化 - すべての8イベントのために**Any Alert**を設定 - 最低30日間ペーパートレード - 取引を文書化（スクリーンショット + ノート） - 週次でパフォーマンスをレビュー - あなたの戦略に基づいてフィルターを調整 --- ## 💡 最後の考え **Trend Gazer v5は「魔法のボタン」インジケーターではありません。**教育、練習、規律を必要とするプロフェッショナル分析フレームワークです。 最高のトレーダーは、インジケーターを使って**何をすべきかを教えてもらいません**。インジケーターを使って、プライスアクションで**既に見ているものを確認**します。 このツールを使用して： - ✅ 分析を確認 - ✅ 低確率セットアップをフィルターアウト - ✅ 機関投資家の足跡を識別 - ✅ エントリーを精密にタイミング 使用を避けるべき： - ❌ コンテキストを理解せずに盲目的に取引 - ❌ リスク管理を無視 - ❌ 損失後にリベンジトレード - ❌ 教育を自動化に置き換える **スマートに取引しましょう。安全に取引しましょう。構造を持って取引しましょう。** --- **© rasukaru666 | 2025 | Mozilla Public License 2.0** *このインジケーターは、取引教育コミュニティに貢献するためにオープンソースとして公開されています。役立つ場合は、あなたの経験を共有して他の人が学ぶのを助けてください。*
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh rasukaru666
1
Golden Cross 50/200 EMATrend-following systems are characterized by having a low win rate, yet in the right circumstances (trending markets and higher timeframes) they can deliver returns that even surpass those of systems with a high win rate. Below, I show you a simple bullish trend-following system with clear execution rules: System Rules -Long entries when the 50-period EMA crosses above the 200-period EMA. -Stop Loss (SL) placed at the lowest low of the 15 candles prior to the entry candle. -Take Profit (TP) triggered when the 50-period EMA crosses below the 200-period EMA. Risk Management -Initial capital: $10,000 -Position size: 10% of capital per trade -Commissions: 0.1% per trade Important Note: In the code, the stop loss is defined using the swing low (15 candles), but the position size is not adjusted based on the distance to the stop loss. In other words, 10% of the equity is risked on each trade, but the actual loss on the trade is not controlled by a maximum fixed percentage of the account — it depends entirely on the stop loss level. This means the loss on a single trade could be significantly higher or lower than 10% of the account equity, depending on volatility. Implementing leverage or reducing position size based on volatility is something I haven’t been able to include in the code, but it would dramatically improve the system’s performance. It would fix a consistent percentage loss per trade, preventing losses from fluctuating wildly with changes in volatility. For example, we can maintain a fixed loss percentage when volatility is low by using the following formula: Leverage = % of SL you’re willing to risk / % volatility from entry point to stop loss And when volatility is high and would exceed the fixed percentage we want to expose per trade (if the SL is hit), we could reduce the position size accordingly. Practical example: Imagine we only want to risk 15% of the position value if the stop loss is triggered on Tesla (which has high volatility), but the distance to the SL represents a potential 23.57% drop. In this case, we subtract the desired risk (15%) from the actual volatility-based loss (23.57%): 23.57% − 15% = 8.57% Now suppose we normally use $200 per trade. To calculate 8.57% of $200: 200 × (8.57 / 100) = $17.14 Then subtract that amount from the original position size: $200 − $17.14 = $182.86 In summary: If we reduce the position size to $182.86 (instead of the usual $200), even if Tesla moves 23.57% against us and hits the stop loss, we would still only lose approximately 15% of the original $200 position — exactly the risk level we defined. This way, we strictly respect our risk management rules regardless of volatility swings. I hope this clearly explains the importance of capping losses at a fixed percentage per trade. This keeps risk under control while maintaining a consistent percentage of capital invested per trade — preventing both statistical distortion of the system and the potential destruction of the account. About the code: Strategy declaration: The strategy is named 'Golden Cross 50/200 EMA'. overlay=true means it will be drawn directly on the price chart. initial_capital=10000 sets the initial capital to $10,000. default_qty_type=strategy.percent_of_equity and default_qty_value=10 means each trade uses 10% of available equity. margin_long=0 indicates no margin is used for long positions (this is likely for simulation purposes only; in real trading, margin would be required). commission_type=strategy.commission.percent and commission_value=0.1 sets a 0.1% commission per trade. Indicators: Calculates two EMAs: a 50-period EMA (ema50) and a 200-period EMA (ema200). Crossover detection: bullCross is triggered when the 50-period EMA crosses above the 200-period EMA (Golden Cross). bearCross is triggered when the 50-period EMA crosses below the 200-period EMA (Death Cross). Recent swing: swingLow calculates the lowest low of the previous 15 periods. Stop Loss: entryStopLoss is a variable initialized as na (not available) and is updated to the current swingLow value whenever a bullCross occurs. Entry and exit conditions: Entry: When a bullCross occurs, the initial stop loss is set to the current swingLow and a long position is opened. Exit on opposite signal: When a bearCross occurs, the long position is closed. Exit on stop loss: If the price falls below entryStopLoss while a position is open, the position is closed. Visualization: Both EMAs are plotted (50-period in blue, 200-period in red). Green triangles are plotted below the bar on a bullCross, and red triangles above the bar on a bearCross. A horizontal orange line is drawn that shows the stop loss level whenever a position is open. Alerts: Alerts are created for:Long entry Exit on bearish crossover (Death Cross) Exit triggered by stop loss Favorable Conditions: Tesla (45-minute timeframe) June 29, 2010 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $12,458.73 or +124.59% Maximum drawdown: $1,210.40 or 8.29% Total trades: 107 Winning trades: 27.10% (29/107) Profit factor: 3.141 Tesla (1-hour timeframe) June 29, 2010 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $7,681.83 or +76.82% Maximum drawdown: $993.36 or 7.30% Total trades: 75 Winning trades: 29.33% (22/75) Profit factor: 3.157 Netflix (45-minute timeframe) May 23, 2002 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $11,380.73 or +113.81% Maximum drawdown: $699.45 or 5.98% Total trades: 134 Winning trades: 36.57% (49/134) Profit factor: 2.885 Netflix (1-hour timeframe) May 23, 2002 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $11,689.05 or +116.89% Maximum drawdown: $844.55 or 7.24% Total trades: 107 Winning trades: 37.38% (40/107) Profit factor: 2.915 Netflix (2-hour timeframe) May 23, 2002 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $12,807.71 or +128.10% Maximum drawdown: $866.52 or 6.03% Total trades: 56 Winning trades: 41.07% (23/56) Profit factor: 3.891 Meta (45-minute timeframe) May 18, 2012 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $2,370.02 or +23.70% Maximum drawdown: $365.27 or 3.50% Total trades: 83 Winning trades: 31.33% (26/83) Profit factor: 2.419 Apple (45-minute timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $8,232.55 or +80.59% Maximum drawdown: $581.11 or 3.16% Total trades: 140 Winning trades: 34.29% (48/140) Profit factor: 3.009 Apple (1-hour timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $9,685.89 or +94.93% Maximum drawdown: $374.69 or 2.26% Total trades: 118 Winning trades: 35.59% (42/118) Profit factor: 3.463 Apple (2-hour timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $8,001.28 or +77.99% Maximum drawdown: $755.84 or 7.56% Total trades: 67 Winning trades: 41.79% (28/67) Profit factor: 3.825 NVDA (15-minute timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $11,828.56 or +118.29% Maximum drawdown: $1,275.43 or 8.06% Total trades: 466 Winning trades: 28.11% (131/466) Profit factor: 2.033 NVDA (30-minute timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $12,203.21 or +122.03% Maximum drawdown: $1,661.86 or 10.35% Total trades: 245 Winning trades: 28.98% (71/245) Profit factor: 2.291 NVDA (45-minute timeframe) January 3, 2000 – November 17, 2025 Total net profit: $16,793.48 or +167.93% Maximum drawdown: $1,458.81 or 8.40% Total trades: 172 Winning trades: 33.14% (57/172) Profit factor: 2.927
Strategi Pine Script®
oleh Especulador96
6
AdjCloseLibLibrary "AdjCloseLib" Library for producing gap-adjusted price series that removes intraday gaps at market open get_adj_close(_gapThresholdPct)   Calculates gap-adjusted close price by detecting and removing gaps at market open (09:15)   Parameters:      _gapThresholdPct (float) : Minimum gap size (in percentage) required to trigger adjustment. Example: 0.5 for 0.5%   Returns: Adjusted close price for the current bar (always returns a numeric value, never na) @details Detects gaps by comparing 09:15 open with previous day's close. If gap exceeds threshold, subtracts the gap value from all bars between 09:15-15:29 inclusive. State resets after session close. get_adj_ohlc(_gapThresholdPct)   Calculates gap-adjusted OHLC values by subtracting detected gap from all price components   Parameters:      _gapThresholdPct (float) : Minimum gap size (in percentage) required to trigger adjustment. Example: 0.5 for 0.5%   Returns: Tuple of @details Useful for calculating indicators (ATR, Heikin-Ashi, etc.) on gap-adjusted data. Applies the same gap adjustment logic to all OHLC components simultaneously.
Perpustakaan Pine Script®
oleh mudrakshqd
Trend-S&R-WiP11-15-2025: This new indicator is my 5/15-Min-ORB-Trend-Finder-WiP indicator simplified to only have: > Market Open > 5-Min & 15-Min High/Low > Support/Resistance lines > Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) > a Trend Line > a Trend table Recommended to be used with my other indicator: Buy-or-Sell-WiP Strategy: > I only trade one ticker, SPX, with ODTE CALL/PUT Credit Spreads > use Break & Retest with 5-Min High/Low or 15-Min High/Low or FVGs > 📈 Bullish Trend Trade: PUT Credit Spread Trend Confirmations: Trend Line is green MACD Histogram is green Price Condition: Nearest resistance 8-10 points above market price > 📉 Bearish Trend Trade: CALL Credit Spread Trend Confirmations: Trend Line is purple MACD Histogram is red Price Condition: Nearest support 8-10 points below market price > Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) - Trade anytime during the day using Break & Retest and all indicator confirmations shown above
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh WorkInProgress374
RSI Overbought/Oversold + Divergence Indicator (new)//@version=5 indicator('CryptoSignalScanner - RSI Overbought/Oversold + Divergence Indicator (new)', //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Define Colors --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vWhite = #FFFFFF vViolet = #C77DF3 vIndigo = #8A2BE2 vBlue = #009CDF vGreen = #5EBD3E vYellow = #FFB900 vRed = #E23838 longColor = color.green shortColor = color.red textColor = color.white bullishColor = color.rgb(38,166,154,0) //Used in the display table bearishColor = color.rgb(239,83,79,0) //Used in the display table nomatchColor = color.silver //Used in the display table //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Functions-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TF2txt(TF) => switch TF "S" => "RSI 1s:" "5S" => "RSI 5s:" "10S" => "RSI 10s:" "15S" => "RSI 15s:" "30S" => "RSI 30s" "1" => "RSI 1m:" "3" => "RSI 3m:" "5" => "RSI 5m:" "15" => "RSI 15m:" "30" => "RSI 30m" "45" => "RSI 45m" "60" => "RSI 1h:" "120" => "RSI 2h:" "180" => "RSI 3h:" "240" => "RSI 4h:" "480" => "RSI 8h:" "D" => "RSI 1D:" "1D" => "RSI 1D:" "2D" => "RSI 2D:" "3D" => "RSI 2D:" "3D" => "RSI 3W:" "W" => "RSI 1W:" "1W" => "RSI 1W:" "M" => "RSI 1M:" "1M" => "RSI 1M:" "3M" => "RSI 3M:" "6M" => "RSI 6M:" "12M" => "RSI 12M:" //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Show/Hide Settings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsiShowInput = input(true, title='Show RSI', group='Show/Hide Settings') maShowInput = input(false, title='Show MA', group='Show/Hide Settings') showRSIMAInput = input(true, title='Show RSIMA Cloud', group='Show/Hide Settings') rsiBandShowInput = input(true, title='Show Oversold/Overbought Lines', group='Show/Hide Settings') rsiBandExtShowInput = input(true, title='Show Oversold/Overbought Extended Lines', group='Show/Hide Settings') rsiHighlightShowInput = input(true, title='Show Oversold/Overbought Highlight Lines', group='Show/Hide Settings') DivergenceShowInput = input(true, title='Show RSI Divergence Labels', group='Show/Hide Settings') //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Table Settings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsiShowTable = input(true, title='Show RSI Table Information box', group="RSI Table Settings") rsiTablePosition = input.string(title='Location', defval='middle_right', options= , group="RSI Table Settings", inline='1') rsiTextSize = input.string(title=' Size', defval='small', options= , group="RSI Table Settings", inline='1') rsiShowTF1 = input(true, title='Show TimeFrame1', group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf1') rsiTF1 = input.timeframe("15", title=" Time", group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf1') rsiShowTF2 = input(true, title='Show TimeFrame2', group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf2') rsiTF2 = input.timeframe("60", title=" Time", group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf2') rsiShowTF3 = input(true, title='Show TimeFrame3', group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf3') rsiTF3 = input.timeframe("240", title=" Time", group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf3') rsiShowTF4 = input(true, title='Show TimeFrame4', group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf4') rsiTF4 = input.timeframe("D", title=" Time", group="RSI Table Settings", inline='tf4') rsiShowHist = input(true, title='Show RSI Historical Columns', group="RSI Table Settings", tooltip='Show the information of the 2 previous closed candles') //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- RSI Input Settings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsiSourceInput = input.source(close, 'Source', group='RSI Settings') rsiLengthInput = input.int(14, minval=1, title='RSI Length', group='RSI Settings', tooltip='Here we set the RSI lenght') rsiColorInput = input.color(#26a69a, title="RSI Color", group='RSI Settings') rsimaColorInput = input.color(#ef534f, title="RSIMA Color", group='RSI Settings') rsiBandColorInput = input.color(#787B86, title="RSI Band Color", group='RSI Settings') rsiUpperBandExtInput = input.int(title='RSI Overbought Extended Line', defval=80, minval=50, maxval=100, group='RSI Settings') rsiUpperBandInput = input.int(title='RSI Overbought Line', defval=70, minval=50, maxval=100, group='RSI Settings') rsiLowerBandInput = input.int(title='RSI Oversold Line', defval=30, minval=0, maxval=50, group='RSI Settings') rsiLowerBandExtInput = input.int(title='RSI Oversold Extended Line', defval=20, minval=0, maxval=50, group='RSI Settings') //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- MA Input Settings ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- maTypeInput = input.string("EMA", title="MA Type", options= , group="MA Settings") maLengthInput = input.int(14, title="MA Length", group="MA Settings") maColorInput = input.color(color.yellow, title="MA Color", group='MA Settings') //#7E57C2 //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Divergence Input Settings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lbrInput = input(title="Pivot Lookback Right", defval=2, group='RSI Divergence Settings') lblInput = input(title="Pivot Lookback Left", defval=2, group='RSI Divergence Settings') lbRangeMaxInput = input(title="Max of Lookback Range", defval=10, group='RSI Divergence Settings') lbRangeMinInput = input(title="Min of Lookback Range", defval=2, group='RSI Divergence Settings') plotBullInput = input(title="Plot Bullish", defval=true, group='RSI Divergence Settings') plotHiddenBullInput = input(title="Plot Hidden Bullish", defval=true, group='RSI Divergence Settings') plotBearInput = input(title="Plot Bearish", defval=true, group='RSI Divergence Settings') plotHiddenBearInput = input(title="Plot Hidden Bearish", defval=true, group='RSI Divergence Settings') //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- RSI Calculation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsi = ta.rsi(rsiSourceInput, rsiLengthInput) rsiprevious = rsi = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, rsiTF1, [rsi, rsi , rsi ], lookahead=barmerge.lookahead_on) = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, rsiTF2, [rsi, rsi , rsi ], lookahead=barmerge.lookahead_on) = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, rsiTF3, [rsi, rsi , rsi ], lookahead=barmerge.lookahead_on) = request.security(syminfo.tickerid, rsiTF4, [rsi, rsi , rsi ], lookahead=barmerge.lookahead_on) //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- MA Calculation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ma(source, length, type) => switch type "SMA" => ta.sma(source, length) "Bollinger Bands" => ta.sma(source, length) "EMA" => ta.ema(source, length) "SMMA (RMA)" => ta.rma(source, length) "WMA" => ta.wma(source, length) "VWMA" => ta.vwma(source, length) rsiMA = ma(rsi, maLengthInput, maTypeInput) rsiMAPrevious = rsiMA //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Stoch RSI Settings + Calculation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- showStochRSI = input(false, title="Show Stochastic RSI", group='Stochastic RSI Settings') smoothK = input.int(title="Stochastic K", defval=3, minval=1, maxval=10, group='Stochastic RSI Settings') smoothD = input.int(title="Stochastic D", defval=4, minval=1, maxval=10, group='Stochastic RSI Settings') lengthRSI = input.int(title="Stochastic RSI Lenght", defval=14, minval=1, group='Stochastic RSI Settings') lengthStoch = input.int(title="Stochastic Lenght", defval=14, minval=1, group='Stochastic RSI Settings') colorK = input.color(color.rgb(41,98,255,0), title="K Color", group='Stochastic RSI Settings', inline="1") colorD = input.color(color.rgb(205,109,0,0), title="D Color", group='Stochastic RSI Settings', inline="1") StochRSI = ta.rsi(rsiSourceInput, lengthRSI) k = ta.sma(ta.stoch(StochRSI, StochRSI, StochRSI, lengthStoch), smoothK) //Blue Line d = ta.sma(k, smoothD) //Red Line //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Divergence Settings ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- bearColor = color.red bullColor = color.green hiddenBullColor = color.new(color.green, 50) hiddenBearColor = color.new(color.red, 50) //textColor = color.white noneColor = color.new(color.white, 100) osc = rsi plFound = na(ta.pivotlow(osc, lblInput, lbrInput)) ? false : true phFound = na(ta.pivothigh(osc, lblInput, lbrInput)) ? false : true _inRange(cond) => bars = ta.barssince(cond == true) lbRangeMinInput <= bars and bars <= lbRangeMaxInput //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Define Plot & Line Colors --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsiColor = rsi >= rsiMA ? rsiColorInput : rsimaColorInput //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Plot Lines ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- // Create a horizontal line at a specific price level myLine = line.new(bar_index , 75, bar_index, 75, color = color.rgb(187, 14, 14), width = 2) bottom = line.new(bar_index , 50, bar_index, 50, color = color.rgb(223, 226, 28), width = 2) mymainLine = line.new(bar_index , 60, bar_index, 60, color = color.rgb(13, 154, 10), width = 3) hline(50, title='RSI Baseline', color=color.new(rsiBandColorInput, 50), linestyle=hline.style_solid, editable=false) hline(rsiBandExtShowInput ? rsiUpperBandExtInput : na, title='RSI Upper Band', color=color.new(rsiBandColorInput, 10), linestyle=hline.style_dashed, editable=false) hline(rsiBandShowInput ? rsiUpperBandInput : na, title='RSI Upper Band', color=color.new(rsiBandColorInput, 10), linestyle=hline.style_dashed, editable=false) hline(rsiBandShowInput ? rsiLowerBandInput : na, title='RSI Upper Band', color=color.new(rsiBandColorInput, 10), linestyle=hline.style_dashed, editable=false) hline(rsiBandExtShowInput ? rsiLowerBandExtInput : na, title='RSI Upper Band', color=color.new(rsiBandColorInput, 10), linestyle=hline.style_dashed, editable=false) bgcolor(rsiHighlightShowInput ? rsi >= rsiUpperBandExtInput ? color.new(rsiColorInput, 70) : na : na, title="Show Extended Oversold Highlight", editable=false) bgcolor(rsiHighlightShowInput ? rsi >= rsiUpperBandInput ? rsi < rsiUpperBandExtInput ? color.new(#64ffda, 90) : na : na: na, title="Show Overbought Highlight", editable=false) bgcolor(rsiHighlightShowInput ? rsi <= rsiLowerBandInput ? rsi > rsiLowerBandExtInput ? color.new(#F43E32, 90) : na : na : na, title="Show Extended Oversold Highlight", editable=false) bgcolor(rsiHighlightShowInput ? rsi <= rsiLowerBandInput ? color.new(rsimaColorInput, 70) : na : na, title="Show Oversold Highlight", editable=false) maPlot = plot(maShowInput ? rsiMA : na, title='MA', color=color.new(maColorInput,0), linewidth=1) rsiMAPlot = plot(showRSIMAInput ? rsiMA : na, title="RSI EMA", color=color.new(rsimaColorInput,0), editable=false, display=display.none) rsiPlot = plot(rsiShowInput ? rsi : na, title='RSI', color=color.new(rsiColor,0), linewidth=1) fill(rsiPlot, rsiMAPlot, color=color.new(rsiColor, 60), title="RSIMA Cloud") plot(showStochRSI ? k : na, title='Stochastic K', color=colorK, linewidth=1) plot(showStochRSI ? d : na, title='Stochastic D', color=colorD, linewidth=1) //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Plot Divergence ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- // Regular Bullish // Osc: Higher Low oscHL = osc > ta.valuewhen(plFound, osc , 1) and _inRange(plFound ) // Price: Lower Low priceLL = low < ta.valuewhen(plFound, low , 1) bullCond = plotBullInput and priceLL and oscHL and plFound plot( plFound ? osc : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Regular Bullish", linewidth=2, color=(bullCond ? bullColor : noneColor) ) plotshape( DivergenceShowInput ? bullCond ? osc : na : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Regular Bullish Label", text=" Bull ", style=shape.labelup, location=location.absolute, color=bullColor, textcolor=textColor ) //------------------------------------------------------------------------------ // Hidden Bullish // Osc: Lower Low oscLL = osc < ta.valuewhen(plFound, osc , 1) and _inRange(plFound ) // Price: Higher Low priceHL = low > ta.valuewhen(plFound, low , 1) hiddenBullCond = plotHiddenBullInput and priceHL and oscLL and plFound plot( plFound ? osc : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Hidden Bullish", linewidth=2, color=(hiddenBullCond ? hiddenBullColor : noneColor) ) plotshape( DivergenceShowInput ? hiddenBullCond ? osc : na : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Hidden Bullish Label", text=" H Bull ", style=shape.labelup, location=location.absolute, color=bullColor, textcolor=textColor ) //------------------------------------------------------------------------------ // Regular Bearish // Osc: Lower High oscLH = osc < ta.valuewhen(phFound, osc , 1) and _inRange(phFound ) // Price: Higher High priceHH = high > ta.valuewhen(phFound, high , 1) bearCond = plotBearInput and priceHH and oscLH and phFound plot( phFound ? osc : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Regular Bearish", linewidth=2, color=(bearCond ? bearColor : noneColor) ) plotshape( DivergenceShowInput ? bearCond ? osc : na : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Regular Bearish Label", text=" Bear ", style=shape.labeldown, location=location.absolute, color=bearColor, textcolor=textColor ) //------------------------------------------------------------------------------ // Hidden Bearish // Osc: Higher High oscHH = osc > ta.valuewhen(phFound, osc , 1) and _inRange(phFound ) // Price: Lower High priceLH = high < ta.valuewhen(phFound, high , 1) hiddenBearCond = plotHiddenBearInput and priceLH and oscHH and phFound plot( phFound ? osc : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Hidden Bearish", linewidth=2, color=(hiddenBearCond ? hiddenBearColor : noneColor) ) plotshape( DivergenceShowInput ? hiddenBearCond ? osc : na : na, offset=-lbrInput, title="Hidden Bearish Label", text=" H Bear ", style=shape.labeldown, location=location.absolute, color=bearColor, textcolor=textColor ) //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Check RSI Lineup ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- bullTF = rsi > rsi and rsi > rsi bearTF = rsi < rsi and rsi < rsi bullTF1 = rsi1 > rsi1_1 and rsi1_1 > rsi1_2 bearTF1 = rsi1 < rsi1_1 and rsi1_1 < rsi1_2 bullTF2 = rsi2 > rsi2_1 and rsi2_1 > rsi2_2 bearTF2 = rsi2 < rsi2_1 and rsi2_1 < rsi2_2 bullTF3 = rsi3 > rsi3_1 and rsi3_1 > rsi3_2 bearTF3 = rsi3 < rsi3_1 and rsi3_1 < rsi3_2 bullTF4 = rsi4 > rsi4_1 and rsi4_1 > rsi4_2 bearTF4 = rsi4 < rsi4_1 and rsi4_1 < rsi4_2 bbTxt(bull,bear) => bull ? "BULLISH" : bear ? "BEARISCH" : 'NO LINEUP' bbColor(bull,bear) => bull ? bullishColor : bear ? bearishColor : nomatchColor newTC(tBox, col, row, txt, width, txtColor, bgColor, txtHA, txtSize) => table.cell(table_id=tBox,column=col, row=row, text=txt, width=width,text_color=txtColor,bgcolor=bgColor, text_halign=txtHA, text_size=txtSize) //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--- Define RSI Table Setting ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- //--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- width_c0 = 0 width_c1 = 0 if rsiShowTable var tBox = table.new(position=rsiTablePosition, columns=5, rows=6, bgcolor=color.rgb(18,22,33,50), frame_color=color.black, frame_width=1, border_color=color.black, border_width=1) newTC(tBox, 0,1,"RSI Current",width_c0,color.orange,color.rgb(0,0,0,100),'right',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 1,1,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi),width_c0,vWhite,rsi < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 4,1,bbTxt(bullTF, bearTF),width_c0,vWhite,bbColor(bullTF, bearTF),'center',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowHist newTC(tBox, 2,1,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi ),width_c0,vWhite,rsi < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 3,1,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi ),width_c0,vWhite,rsi < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowTF1 newTC(tBox, 0,2,TF2txt(rsiTF1),width_c0,vWhite,color.rgb(0,0,0,100),'right',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 1,2,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi1),width_c0,vWhite,rsi1 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 4,2,bbTxt(bullTF1, bearTF1),width_c0,vWhite,bbColor(bullTF1,bearTF1),'center',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowHist newTC(tBox, 2,2,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi1_1),width_c0,vWhite,rsi1_1 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 3,2,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi1_2),width_c0,vWhite,rsi1_2 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowTF2 newTC(tBox, 0,3,TF2txt(rsiTF2),width_c0,vWhite,color.rgb(0,0,0,100),'right',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 1,3,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi2),width_c0,vWhite,rsi2 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 4,3,bbTxt(bullTF2, bearTF2),width_c0,vWhite,bbColor(bullTF2,bearTF2),'center',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowHist newTC(tBox, 2,3,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi2_1),width_c0,vWhite,rsi2_1 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 3,3,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi2_2),width_c0,vWhite,rsi2_2 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowTF3 newTC(tBox, 0,4,TF2txt(rsiTF3),width_c0,vWhite,color.rgb(0,0,0,100),'right',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 1,4,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi3),width_c0,vWhite,rsi3 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 4,4,bbTxt(bullTF3, bearTF3),width_c0,vWhite,bbColor(bullTF3,bearTF3),'center',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowHist newTC(tBox, 2,4,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi3_1),width_c0,vWhite,rsi3_1 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 3,4,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi3_2),width_c0,vWhite,rsi3_2 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowTF4 newTC(tBox, 0,5,TF2txt(rsiTF4),width_c0,vWhite,color.rgb(0,0,0,100),'right',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 1,5,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi4),width_c0,vWhite,rsi4 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 4,5,bbTxt(bullTF4, bearTF4),width_c0,vWhite,bbColor(bullTF4,bearTF4),'center',rsiTextSize) if rsiShowHist newTC(tBox, 2,5,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi4_1),width_c0,vWhite,rsi4_1 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) newTC(tBox, 3,5,str.format(" {0,number,#.##} ", rsi4_2),width_c0,vWhite,rsi4_2 < 50 ? bearishColor:bullishColor,'left',rsiTextSize) //------------------------------------------------------ //--- Alerts ------------------------------------------- //------------------------------------------------------
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh RandyDahlin
High and low statisticsHigh/Low Pattern Analyzer (All Timeframes) Ever wonder if there's a hidden pattern in the market? Does the high of the week usually happen on a Tuesday? Does the low of the month always form in the first week? Which 15-minute candle really sets the high for the entire day? This indicator is a powerful statistical tool designed to answer these questions by analyzing historical price action to find patterns in when the high and low of a period are formed. The Core Idea: Daily High & Low of the Week The simplest and most popular feature of this indicator is the "Daily high and low of the week" analysis. What it does: It looks back over your chosen number of weeks (e.g., the last 100) and finds out which day of the week (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, etc.) made the final high and which day made the final low for each of those weeks. How to use it: Go to the script settings. Enable the "Daily High/Low of the Week" module. Set your chart to the 1D (Daily) timeframe. A table will appear on your chart (bottom-right by default) showing the exact count and percentage for each day. This lets you see at a glance if there's a strong tendency for the market you're watching. Advanced Analysis: Other Timeframes This script goes far beyond just the daily chart. It includes four other independent analysis modules: 1. 4-Hour High/Low of the Week What it does: For intraday and swing traders. This module finds which 4-hour candle session (e.g., the 08:00 candle, the 16:00 candle) tends to form the high or low of the entire week. Key Feature (DST Aware): This table is "season-aware." It knows that the 08:00 "summertime" (DST) candle is the same trading session as the 07:00 "wintertime" (STD) candle. It groups them together so your data is never split or messy. 2. Weekly High/Low of the Month What it does: For a monthly perspective. This module finds which week of the month (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) is most likely to form the monthly high or low. How to use: Enable it and set your chart to the 1W (Weekly) timeframe. 3. Monthly High/Low of the Year What it does: The ultimate "big picture" view. This module finds which month (Jan, Feb, Mar, etc.) most frequently forms the high or low for the entire year. How to use: Enable it and set your chart to the 1M (Monthly) timeframe. The Power User Module: Custom Timeframe Analysis This is the most powerful feature. It lets you analyze any timeframe combination you want. What it does: It finds out which "Lower Timeframe" (LTF) candle made the high or low of any "Higher Timeframe" (HTF) you choose. Example: Do you want to know which 15-minute candle makes the Daily high? Set your chart to the 15M timeframe. Go to the "Custom Timeframe Analysis" settings. Set the "Higher Timeframe" to "1D". The script will draw a "season-aware" table (just like the 4H module) showing you the exact 15-minute candles (09:15, 09:30, etc.) that are statistically most likely to form the day's high or low. Other Features Show Labels: Each module has an option to "Show labels," which will draw a label (e.g., "Daily High of the Week") directly on the chart at the exact bar that made the high or low. Custom Dividers: Each module has its own optional, color-customizable divider (e.g., weekly, monthly) that you can toggle on to see the periods more clearly. Clean Settings: All modules are disabled by default (except for "Daily") to keep your chart clean. You only need to enable the specific analysis you want to see. This tool was built to turn your curiosity about market patterns into actionable, statistical data. Enjoy!
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh nickbonenkamp
3
Fish OrbThis indicator marks and tracks the first 15-minute range of the New York session open (default 9:30–9:45 AM ET) — a critical volatility period for futures like NQ (Nasdaq). It helps you visually anchor intraday price action to that initial opening range. Core Functionality 1. Opening Range Calculation It measures the High, Low, and Midpoint of the first 15 minutes after the NY market opens (default 09:30–09:45 ET). You can change the window or timezone in the inputs. 2. Visual Overlays During the 15-minute window: A teal shaded box highlights the open range period. Live white lines mark the current High and Low. A red line marks the midpoint (mid-range). These update in real-time as each bar forms. 3. Post-Window Behavior When the 15-minute window ends: The High, Low, and Midpoint are locked in. The indicator draws persistent horizontal lines for those values. 4. Historical Days You can keep today + a set number of previous days (configurable via “Previous Days to Keep”). Older days automatically delete to keep charts clean. 5. Line Extension Control Each day’s lines extend to the right after they form. You can toggle “Stop Lines at Next NY Open”: ON: Yesterday’s lines stop exactly at the next NY session open (09:30 ET). OFF: Lines extend indefinitely across the chart.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh Fishhhhh_
Moving Averages PowerMoving Averages Power — Trend + Normalized Strength Lightweight indicator that plots up to 15 SMAs (5 → 4320) and shows a compact table with each MA’s: Slope % (per-bar) Trend (Bullish/Bearish/Neutral) Normalized “Strength” bars comparable across MA lengths and, optionally, across timeframes via ATR% Not financial advice. For research/education only. What it does Plots 15 SMA lines on the price chart Colors match trend: Bullish (green), Bearish (red), Neutral (gray) Bottom-right table: MA, Slope %, Trend, Strength bars Strength normalization modes: None: raw |slope%| Length: scales by length relative to a reference length ATR%: scales by volatility (ATR as % of price) Length+ATR%: combines both for better cross-timeframe comparability How it works (concepts) Slope % per bar: 100 × (MA − MA ) / MA Normalization: None: S = |slope%| Length: S = |slope%| × (length / normRefLen) ATR%: S = |slope%| / ATR%, where ATR% = 100 × ATR(atrLen) / close Length+ATR%: S = (|slope%| × (length / normRefLen)) / ATR% Bars: floor(S / strengthStep), clamped to Max bars (default 10) Notes: normRefLen (default 240) keeps Length scaling stable across very short and very long MAs In ATR modes, Strength shows blank until there’s enough history for ATR How to use Add the indicator to your chart (Indicators → search this title → Add). Open Settings: Show/hide any of the 15 SMAs Choose Strength normalization mode Tune Strength step, Max bars, Reference length, and ATR Length Read the table: MA: period Slope %: per-bar percent change of the MA Trend: green (bullish), red (bearish), gray (neutral) Strength: more bars = stronger trend under the chosen normalization Inputs (quick reference) Display: 15 toggles: Show SMA 5 … Show SMA 4320 Strength Settings: Strength normalization: None | Length | ATR% | Length+ATR% Strength step (normalized units): sensitivity of bar count Max bars: clamp for the bar count (default 10) Normalization reference length: baseline for Length scaling (default 240) ATR Length (for ATR%): ATR lookback used for ATR% Text: Label font size, Table font size Line + label colors Bullish (slope > 0): green Bearish (slope < 0): red Neutral (otherwise): gray The MA lines, end-of-series labels, and table trend cell use the same colors Recommended presets (examples) Intraday (e.g., BTCUSD, 1h): Strength normalization: Length+ATR% normRefLen: 240 Strength step: 0.02–0.05 Max bars: 10 ATR Length: 14 Daily (e.g., AAPL, 1D): Strength normalization: Length normRefLen: 240–480 Strength step: 0.01–0.03 Max bars: 10 Calibration tips Bars often at max (pegged)? Increase Strength step (e.g., 0.01 → 0.03 → 0.05) Or increase normRefLen (e.g., 240 → 480 → 720) Bars too few? Decrease Strength step (e.g., 0.02 → 0.01 → 0.005) Or decrease normRefLen (e.g., 240 → 120) Cross-timeframe comparability: Prefer Length+ATR%; start with Strength step ≈ 0.02–0.05 and tune Limitations SMA only (no EMA/WMA/etc.) Per-bar slope is inherently timeframe-sensitive; use ATR% or Length+ATR% for better cross-timeframe comparisons ATR modes require atrLen bars; Strength shows blank until ready The longest SMA (4320) needs sufficient chart history Troubleshooting Strength always looks maxed: You might be on Length mode with a very small step; increase Strength step and/or use Length+ATR%; review normRefLen Strength blank cells: In ATR modes, wait for enough history (atrLen) or switch to Length mode Table bounds: The script manages rows internally; if you customize periods, ensure the total rows fit the 4×16 table Compatibility Pine Script v6 Works on most symbols/timeframes with adequate history If you find this useful, consider leaving feedback with your preferred defaults (symbol/timeframe) so I can provide better presets.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh codyhome
Billionaire Gold ClubBillionaire Gold Club — Long-Term Gold Trend Follower Overview The Billionaire Gold Club indicator is designed for traders who follow the long-term bullish bias of Gold (XAU/USD). It focuses only on BUY opportunities and encourages patience during market pullbacks. The goal is to trade with the main trend, not against it. Instructions 1. The script automatically plots 7MA (fast) and 200MA (slow). 2. When 7MA crosses above 200MA, a BUY signal appears. 3. When 7MA crosses below 200MA, a Standby signal appears — do not sell, just wait for the next BUY. Usage Rules • Recommended timeframe: 15-minute or higher. • If used below 15 minutes, treat it as day trading — close trades within the same day. • Focus on long-term holding and small lot sizes to protect your capital. Signal Guide 🟢 BUY → Enter the trend direction. 🟠 Standby → Pause new entries and wait patiently. Alerts Set alerts to "Once per bar close": • BUY Signal → Golden Cross confirmed. • Standby Signal → Death Cross confirmed. Philosophy "Obey the rules, and your probability of success increases." This system rewards patience, discipline, and long-term trend following. Follow me for more TradingView scripts and updates. Billionaire Gold Clubは、ゴールド（XAU/USD）の長期上昇トレンドに沿って取引するためのインジケーターです。 基本的にBUYのみを狙い、デッドクロス時はStandby（待機）状態として次のBUYを待ちます。 推奨時間軸：15分足以上。 15分未満で使用する場合はデイトレードとして同日中にクローズすることを推奨します。 ロットを小さく保ち、長期保有で安定した運用を目指してください。
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh hrak22
1
MNQ Morning Indicator | Clean SignalsMNQ Morning Trading Indicator Summary What It Does This is a TradingView indicator designed for day trading MNQ (Micro Nasdaq-100 futures) during morning sessions. It generates BUY and SELL signals only when multiple technical conditions align, helping traders identify high-probability trade setups. Core Strategy BUY Signal Requirements (All must be true): ✅ Price above VWAP (volume-weighted average price) ✅ Fast EMA (9) above Slow EMA (21) - uptrend confirmation ✅ Price above 15-minute 50 EMA - higher timeframe confirmation ✅ MACD histogram positive - momentum confirmation ✅ RSI above 55 - strength confirmation ✅ ADX above 25 - trending market (not choppy) ✅ Volume 1.5x above average - strong participation SELL Signal (opposite conditions) Key Features 🎯 Risk Management Stop Loss: 2× ATR (Average True Range) Take Profit 1: 2× ATR (1:2 risk-reward) Take Profit 2: 3× ATR (1:3 risk-reward) Dollar values: Calculates P&L based on MNQ's $2/point value ⏰ Session Filter Default: 9:30 AM - 11:30 AM ET (customizable) Safety feature: Avoids first 15 minutes (high volatility period) Won't generate signals outside trading hours 🛡️ Signal Quality Rates each signal: 🔥 STRONG, ⚡ MEDIUM, or ⚠️ WEAK Requires minimum 15 bars between signals (prevents overtrading) 📊 Visual Dashboard Shows real-time metrics: ATR values ADX (trend strength) RSI (momentum) Market condition (TREND/CHOP) Session status Volume status Signal cooldown timer Visual Elements 📈 VWAP with standard deviation bands (1σ, 2σ, 3σ) 📉 Multiple EMAs with trend-based coloring 🟢/🔴 Buy/Sell arrows on chart 📋 Detailed trade labels showing entry, SL, TPs, and risk-reward ratios 🎨 Background highlighting for market conditions Safety Features Cooldown period between signals Session restrictions (no trading outside set hours) First 15-minute avoidance (post-open volatility) Multi-confirmation requirement (all 7 conditions must align) Trend filter (ADX minimum to avoid choppy markets) Best For Day traders focused on morning sessions MNQ futures traders Traders who prefer systematic, rule-based entries Those wanting pre-calculated risk management levels Customization All parameters are adjustable: EMA periods MACD settings RSI thresholds ADX minimum ATR multipliers Session times Visual preferences This indicator is designed to be conservative — it waits for strong confirmation before signaling, which means fewer but potentially higher-quality trades.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh elivgorelick
1
Dynamic Equity Allocation Model"Cash is Trash"? Not Always. Here's Why Science Beats Guesswork. Every retail trader knows the frustration: you draw support and resistance lines, you spot patterns, you follow market gurus on social media—and still, when the next bear market hits, your portfolio bleeds red. Meanwhile, institutional investors seem to navigate market turbulence with ease, preserving capital when markets crash and participating when they rally. What's their secret? The answer isn't insider information or access to exotic derivatives. It's systematic, scientifically validated decision-making. While most retail traders rely on subjective chart analysis and emotional reactions, professional portfolio managers use quantitative models that remove emotion from the equation and process multiple streams of market information simultaneously. This document presents exactly such a system—not a proprietary black box available only to hedge funds, but a fully transparent, academically grounded framework that any serious investor can understand and apply. The Dynamic Equity Allocation Model (DEAM) synthesizes decades of financial research from Nobel laureates and leading academics into a practical tool for tactical asset allocation. Stop drawing colorful lines on your chart and start thinking like a quant. This isn't about predicting where the market goes next week—it's about systematically adjusting your risk exposure based on what the data actually tells you. When valuations scream danger, when volatility spikes, when credit markets freeze, when multiple warning signals align—that's when cash isn't trash. That's when cash saves your portfolio. The irony of "cash is trash" rhetoric is that it ignores timing. Yes, being 100% cash for decades would be disastrous. But being 100% equities through every crisis is equally foolish. The sophisticated approach is dynamic: aggressive when conditions favor risk-taking, defensive when they don't. This model shows you how to make that decision systematically, not emotionally. Whether you're managing your own retirement portfolio or seeking to understand how institutional allocation strategies work, this comprehensive analysis provides the theoretical foundation, mathematical implementation, and practical guidance to elevate your investment approach from amateur to professional. The choice is yours: keep hoping your chart patterns work out, or start using the same quantitative methods that professionals rely on. The tools are here. The research is cited. The methodology is explained. All you need to do is read, understand, and apply. The Dynamic Equity Allocation Model (DEAM) is a quantitative framework for systematic allocation between equities and cash, grounded in modern portfolio theory and empirical market research. The model integrates five scientifically validated dimensions of market analysis—market regime, risk metrics, valuation, sentiment, and macroeconomic conditions—to generate dynamic allocation recommendations ranging from 0% to 100% equity exposure. This work documents the theoretical foundations, mathematical implementation, and practical application of this multi-factor approach. 1. Introduction and Theoretical Background 1.1 The Limitations of Static Portfolio Allocation Traditional portfolio theory, as formulated by Markowitz (1952) in his seminal work "Portfolio Selection," assumes an optimal static allocation where investors distribute their wealth across asset classes according to their risk aversion. This approach rests on the assumption that returns and risks remain constant over time. However, empirical research demonstrates that this assumption does not hold in reality. Fama and French (1989) showed that expected returns vary over time and correlate with macroeconomic variables such as the spread between long-term and short-term interest rates. Campbell and Shiller (1988) demonstrated that the price-earnings ratio possesses predictive power for future stock returns, providing a foundation for dynamic allocation strategies. The academic literature on tactical asset allocation has evolved considerably over recent decades. Ilmanen (2011) argues in "Expected Returns" that investors can improve their risk-adjusted returns by considering valuation levels, business cycles, and market sentiment. The Dynamic Equity Allocation Model presented here builds on this research tradition and operationalizes these insights into a practically applicable allocation framework. 1.2 Multi-Factor Approaches in Asset Allocation Modern financial research has shown that different factors capture distinct aspects of market dynamics and together provide a more robust picture of market conditions than individual indicators. Ross (1976) developed the Arbitrage Pricing Theory, a model that employs multiple factors to explain security returns. Following this multi-factor philosophy, DEAM integrates five complementary analytical dimensions, each tapping different information sources and collectively enabling comprehensive market understanding. 2. Data Foundation and Data Quality 2.1 Data Sources Used The model draws its data exclusively from publicly available market data via the TradingView platform. This transparency and accessibility is a significant advantage over proprietary models that rely on non-public data. The data foundation encompasses several categories of market information, each capturing specific aspects of market dynamics. First, price data for the S&P 500 Index is obtained through the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (ticker: SPY). The use of a highly liquid ETF instead of the index itself has practical reasons, as ETF data is available in real-time and reflects actual tradability. In addition to closing prices, high, low, and volume data are captured, which are required for calculating advanced volatility measures. Fundamental corporate metrics are retrieved via TradingView's Financial Data API. These include earnings per share, price-to-earnings ratio, return on equity, debt-to-equity ratio, dividend yield, and share buyback yield. Cochrane (2011) emphasizes in "Presidential Address: Discount Rates" the central importance of valuation metrics for forecasting future returns, making these fundamental data a cornerstone of the model. Volatility indicators are represented by the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) and related metrics. The VIX, often referred to as the market's "fear gauge," measures the implied volatility of S&P 500 index options and serves as a proxy for market participants' risk perception. Whaley (2000) describes in "The Investor Fear Gauge" the construction and interpretation of the VIX and its use as a sentiment indicator. Macroeconomic data includes yield curve information through US Treasury bonds of various maturities and credit risk premiums through the spread between high-yield bonds and risk-free government bonds. These variables capture the macroeconomic conditions and financing conditions relevant for equity valuation. Estrella and Hardouvelis (1991) showed that the shape of the yield curve has predictive power for future economic activity, justifying the inclusion of these data. 2.2 Handling Missing Data A practical problem when working with financial data is dealing with missing or unavailable values. The model implements a fallback system where a plausible historical average value is stored for each fundamental metric. When current data is unavailable for a specific point in time, this fallback value is used. This approach ensures that the model remains functional even during temporary data outages and avoids systematic biases from missing data. The use of average values as fallback is conservative, as it generates neither overly optimistic nor pessimistic signals. 3. Component 1: Market Regime Detection 3.1 The Concept of Market Regimes The idea that financial markets exist in different "regimes" or states that differ in their statistical properties has a long tradition in financial science. Hamilton (1989) developed regime-switching models that allow distinguishing between different market states with different return and volatility characteristics. The practical application of this theory consists of identifying the current market state and adjusting portfolio allocation accordingly. DEAM classifies market regimes using a scoring system that considers three main dimensions: trend strength, volatility level, and drawdown depth. This multidimensional view is more robust than focusing on individual indicators, as it captures various facets of market dynamics. Classification occurs into six distinct regimes: Strong Bull, Bull Market, Neutral, Correction, Bear Market, and Crisis. 3.2 Trend Analysis Through Moving Averages Moving averages are among the oldest and most widely used technical indicators and have also received attention in academic literature. Brock, Lakonishok, and LeBaron (1992) examined in "Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns" the profitability of trading rules based on moving averages and found evidence for their predictive power, although later studies questioned the robustness of these results when considering transaction costs. The model calculates three moving averages with different time windows: a 20-day average (approximately one trading month), a 50-day average (approximately one quarter), and a 200-day average (approximately one trading year). The relationship of the current price to these averages and the relationship of the averages to each other provide information about trend strength and direction. When the price trades above all three averages and the short-term average is above the long-term, this indicates an established uptrend. The model assigns points based on these constellations, with longer-term trends weighted more heavily as they are considered more persistent. 3.3 Volatility Regimes Volatility, understood as the standard deviation of returns, is a central concept of financial theory and serves as the primary risk measure. However, research has shown that volatility is not constant but changes over time and occurs in clusters—a phenomenon first documented by Mandelbrot (1963) and later formalized through ARCH and GARCH models (Engle, 1982; Bollerslev, 1986). DEAM calculates volatility not only through the classic method of return standard deviation but also uses more advanced estimators such as the Parkinson estimator and the Garman-Klass estimator. These methods utilize intraday information (high and low prices) and are more efficient than simple close-to-close volatility estimators. The Parkinson estimator (Parkinson, 1980) uses the range between high and low of a trading day and is based on the recognition that this information reveals more about true volatility than just the closing price difference. The Garman-Klass estimator (Garman and Klass, 1980) extends this approach by additionally considering opening and closing prices. The calculated volatility is annualized by multiplying it by the square root of 252 (the average number of trading days per year), enabling standardized comparability. The model compares current volatility with the VIX, the implied volatility from option prices. A low VIX (below 15) signals market comfort and increases the regime score, while a high VIX (above 35) indicates market stress and reduces the score. This interpretation follows the empirical observation that elevated volatility is typically associated with falling markets (Schwert, 1989). 3.4 Drawdown Analysis A drawdown refers to the percentage decline from the highest point (peak) to the lowest point (trough) during a specific period. This metric is psychologically significant for investors as it represents the maximum loss experienced. Calmar (1991) developed the Calmar Ratio, which relates return to maximum drawdown, underscoring the practical relevance of this metric. The model calculates current drawdown as the percentage distance from the highest price of the last 252 trading days (one year). A drawdown below 3% is considered negligible and maximally increases the regime score. As drawdown increases, the score decreases progressively, with drawdowns above 20% classified as severe and indicating a crisis or bear market regime. These thresholds are empirically motivated by historical market cycles, in which corrections typically encompassed 5-10% drawdowns, bear markets 20-30%, and crises over 30%. 3.5 Regime Classification Final regime classification occurs through aggregation of scores from trend (40% weight), volatility (30%), and drawdown (30%). The higher weighting of trend reflects the empirical observation that trend-following strategies have historically delivered robust results (Moskowitz, Ooi, and Pedersen, 2012). A total score above 80 signals a strong bull market with established uptrend, low volatility, and minimal losses. At a score below 10, a crisis situation exists requiring defensive positioning. The six regime categories enable a differentiated allocation strategy that not only distinguishes binarily between bullish and bearish but allows gradual gradations. 4. Component 2: Risk-Based Allocation 4.1 Volatility Targeting as Risk Management Approach The concept of volatility targeting is based on the idea that investors should maximize not returns but risk-adjusted returns. Sharpe (1966, 1994) defined with the Sharpe Ratio the fundamental concept of return per unit of risk, measured as volatility. Volatility targeting goes a step further and adjusts portfolio allocation to achieve constant target volatility. This means that in times of low market volatility, equity allocation is increased, and in times of high volatility, it is reduced. Moreira and Muir (2017) showed in "Volatility-Managed Portfolios" that strategies that adjust their exposure based on volatility forecasts achieve higher Sharpe Ratios than passive buy-and-hold strategies. DEAM implements this principle by defining a target portfolio volatility (default 12% annualized) and adjusting equity allocation to achieve it. The mathematical foundation is simple: if market volatility is 20% and target volatility is 12%, equity allocation should be 60% (12/20 = 0.6), with the remaining 40% held in cash with zero volatility. 4.2 Market Volatility Calculation Estimating current market volatility is central to the risk-based allocation approach. The model uses several volatility estimators in parallel and selects the higher value between traditional close-to-close volatility and the Parkinson estimator. This conservative choice ensures the model does not underestimate true volatility, which could lead to excessive risk exposure. Traditional volatility calculation uses logarithmic returns, as these have mathematically advantageous properties (additive linkage over multiple periods). The logarithmic return is calculated as ln(P_t / P_{t-1}), where P_t is the price at time t. The standard deviation of these returns over a rolling 20-trading-day window is then multiplied by √252 to obtain annualized volatility. This annualization is based on the assumption of independently identically distributed returns, which is an idealization but widely accepted in practice. The Parkinson estimator uses additional information from the trading range (High minus Low) of each day. The formula is: σ_P = (1/√(4ln2)) × √(1/n × Σln²(H_i/L_i)) × √252, where H_i and L_i are high and low prices. Under ideal conditions, this estimator is approximately five times more efficient than the close-to-close estimator (Parkinson, 1980), as it uses more information per observation. 4.3 Drawdown-Based Position Size Adjustment In addition to volatility targeting, the model implements drawdown-based risk control. The logic is that deep market declines often signal further losses and therefore justify exposure reduction. This behavior corresponds with the concept of path-dependent risk tolerance: investors who have already suffered losses are typically less willing to take additional risk (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979). The model defines a maximum portfolio drawdown as a target parameter (default 15%). Since portfolio volatility and portfolio drawdown are proportional to equity allocation (assuming cash has neither volatility nor drawdown), allocation-based control is possible. For example, if the market exhibits a 25% drawdown and target portfolio drawdown is 15%, equity allocation should be at most 60% (15/25). 4.4 Dynamic Risk Adjustment An advanced feature of DEAM is dynamic adjustment of risk-based allocation through a feedback mechanism. The model continuously estimates what actual portfolio volatility and portfolio drawdown would result at the current allocation. If risk utilization (ratio of actual to target risk) exceeds 1.0, allocation is reduced by an adjustment factor that grows exponentially with overutilization. This implements a form of dynamic feedback that avoids overexposure. Mathematically, a risk adjustment factor r_adjust is calculated: if risk utilization u > 1, then r_adjust = exp(-0.5 × (u - 1)). This exponential function ensures that moderate overutilization is gently corrected, while strong overutilization triggers drastic reductions. The factor 0.5 in the exponent was empirically calibrated to achieve a balanced ratio between sensitivity and stability. 5. Component 3: Valuation Analysis 5.1 Theoretical Foundations of Fundamental Valuation DEAM's valuation component is based on the fundamental premise that the intrinsic value of a security is determined by its future cash flows and that deviations between market price and intrinsic value are eventually corrected. Graham and Dodd (1934) established in "Security Analysis" the basic principles of fundamental analysis that remain relevant today. Translated into modern portfolio context, this means that markets with high valuation metrics (high price-earnings ratios) should have lower expected returns than cheaply valued markets. Campbell and Shiller (1988) developed the Cyclically Adjusted P/E Ratio (CAPE), which smooths earnings over a full business cycle. Their empirical analysis showed that this ratio has significant predictive power for 10-year returns. Asness, Moskowitz, and Pedersen (2013) demonstrated in "Value and Momentum Everywhere" that value effects exist not only in individual stocks but also in asset classes and markets. 5.2 Equity Risk Premium as Central Valuation Metric The Equity Risk Premium (ERP) is defined as the expected excess return of stocks over risk-free government bonds. It is the theoretical heart of valuation analysis, as it represents the compensation investors demand for bearing equity risk. Damodaran (2012) discusses in "Equity Risk Premiums: Determinants, Estimation and Implications" various methods for ERP estimation. DEAM calculates ERP not through a single method but combines four complementary approaches with different weights. This multi-method strategy increases estimation robustness and avoids dependence on single, potentially erroneous inputs. The first method (35% weight) uses earnings yield, calculated as 1/P/E or directly from operating earnings data, and subtracts the 10-year Treasury yield. This method follows Fed Model logic (Yardeni, 2003), although this model has theoretical weaknesses as it does not consistently treat inflation (Asness, 2003). The second method (30% weight) extends earnings yield by share buyback yield. Share buybacks are a form of capital return to shareholders and increase value per share. Boudoukh et al. (2007) showed in "The Total Shareholder Yield" that the sum of dividend yield and buyback yield is a better predictor of future returns than dividend yield alone. The third method (20% weight) implements the Gordon Growth Model (Gordon, 1962), which models stock value as the sum of discounted future dividends. Under constant growth g assumption: Expected Return = Dividend Yield + g. The model estimates sustainable growth as g = ROE × (1 - Payout Ratio), where ROE is return on equity and payout ratio is the ratio of dividends to earnings. This formula follows from equity theory: unretained earnings are reinvested at ROE and generate additional earnings growth. The fourth method (15% weight) combines total shareholder yield (Dividend + Buybacks) with implied growth derived from revenue growth. This method considers that companies with strong revenue growth should generate higher future earnings, even if current valuations do not yet fully reflect this. The final ERP is the weighted average of these four methods. A high ERP (above 4%) signals attractive valuations and increases the valuation score to 95 out of 100 possible points. A negative ERP, where stocks have lower expected returns than bonds, results in a minimal score of 10. 5.3 Quality Adjustments to Valuation Valuation metrics alone can be misleading if not interpreted in the context of company quality. A company with a low P/E may be cheap or fundamentally problematic. The model therefore implements quality adjustments based on growth, profitability, and capital structure. Revenue growth above 10% annually adds 10 points to the valuation score, moderate growth above 5% adds 5 points. This adjustment reflects that growth has independent value (Modigliani and Miller, 1961, extended by later growth theory). Net margin above 15% signals pricing power and operational efficiency and increases the score by 5 points, while low margins below 8% indicate competitive pressure and subtract 5 points. Return on equity (ROE) above 20% characterizes outstanding capital efficiency and increases the score by 5 points. Piotroski (2000) showed in "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information" that fundamental quality signals such as high ROE can improve the performance of value strategies. Capital structure is evaluated through the debt-to-equity ratio. A conservative ratio below 1.0 multiplies the valuation score by 1.2, while high leverage above 2.0 applies a multiplier of 0.8. This adjustment reflects that high debt constrains financial flexibility and can become problematic in crisis times (Korteweg, 2010). 6. Component 4: Sentiment Analysis 6.1 The Role of Sentiment in Financial Markets Investor sentiment, defined as the collective psychological attitude of market participants, influences asset prices independently of fundamental data. Baker and Wurgler (2006, 2007) developed a sentiment index and showed that periods of high sentiment are followed by overvaluations that later correct. This insight justifies integrating a sentiment component into allocation decisions. Sentiment is difficult to measure directly but can be proxied through market indicators. The VIX is the most widely used sentiment indicator, as it aggregates implied volatility from option prices. High VIX values reflect elevated uncertainty and risk aversion, while low values signal market comfort. Whaley (2009) refers to the VIX as the "Investor Fear Gauge" and documents its role as a contrarian indicator: extremely high values typically occur at market bottoms, while low values occur at tops. 6.2 VIX-Based Sentiment Assessment DEAM uses statistical normalization of the VIX by calculating the Z-score: z = (VIX_current - VIX_average) / VIX_standard_deviation. The Z-score indicates how many standard deviations the current VIX is from the historical average. This approach is more robust than absolute thresholds, as it adapts to the average volatility level, which can vary over longer periods. A Z-score below -1.5 (VIX is 1.5 standard deviations below average) signals exceptionally low risk perception and adds 40 points to the sentiment score. This may seem counterintuitive—shouldn't low fear be bullish? However, the logic follows the contrarian principle: when no one is afraid, everyone is already invested, and there is limited further upside potential (Zweig, 1973). Conversely, a Z-score above 1.5 (extreme fear) adds -40 points, reflecting market panic but simultaneously suggesting potential buying opportunities. 6.3 VIX Term Structure as Sentiment Signal The VIX term structure provides additional sentiment information. Normally, the VIX trades in contango, meaning longer-term VIX futures have higher prices than short-term. This reflects that short-term volatility is currently known, while long-term volatility is more uncertain and carries a risk premium. The model compares the VIX with VIX9D (9-day volatility) and identifies backwardation (VIX > 1.05 × VIX9D) and steep backwardation (VIX > 1.15 × VIX9D). Backwardation occurs when short-term implied volatility is higher than longer-term, which typically happens during market stress. Investors anticipate immediate turbulence but expect calming. Psychologically, this reflects acute fear. The model subtracts 15 points for backwardation and 30 for steep backwardation, as these constellations signal elevated risk. Simon and Wiggins (2001) analyzed the VIX futures curve and showed that backwardation is associated with market declines. 6.4 Safe-Haven Flows During crisis times, investors flee from risky assets into safe havens: gold, US dollar, and Japanese yen. This "flight to quality" is a sentiment signal. The model calculates the performance of these assets relative to stocks over the last 20 trading days. When gold or the dollar strongly rise while stocks fall, this indicates elevated risk aversion. The safe-haven component is calculated as the difference between safe-haven performance and stock performance. Positive values (safe havens outperform) subtract up to 20 points from the sentiment score, negative values (stocks outperform) add up to 10 points. The asymmetric treatment (larger deduction for risk-off than bonus for risk-on) reflects that risk-off movements are typically sharper and more informative than risk-on phases. Baur and Lucey (2010) examined safe-haven properties of gold and showed that gold indeed exhibits negative correlation with stocks during extreme market movements, confirming its role as crisis protection. 7. Component 5: Macroeconomic Analysis 7.1 The Yield Curve as Economic Indicator The yield curve, represented as yields of government bonds of various maturities, contains aggregated expectations about future interest rates, inflation, and economic growth. The slope of the yield curve has remarkable predictive power for recessions. Estrella and Mishkin (1998) showed that an inverted yield curve (short-term rates higher than long-term) predicts recessions with high reliability. This is because inverted curves reflect restrictive monetary policy: the central bank raises short-term rates to combat inflation, dampening economic activity. DEAM calculates two spread measures: the 2-year-minus-10-year spread and the 3-month-minus-10-year spread. A steep, positive curve (spreads above 1.5% and 2% respectively) signals healthy growth expectations and generates the maximum yield curve score of 40 points. A flat curve (spreads near zero) reduces the score to 20 points. An inverted curve (negative spreads) is particularly alarming and results in only 10 points. The choice of two different spreads increases analysis robustness. The 2-10 spread is most established in academic literature, while the 3M-10Y spread is often considered more sensitive, as the 3-month rate directly reflects current monetary policy (Ang, Piazzesi, and Wei, 2006). 7.2 Credit Conditions and Spreads Credit spreads—the yield difference between risky corporate bonds and safe government bonds—reflect risk perception in the credit market. Gilchrist and Zakrajšek (2012) constructed an "Excess Bond Premium" that measures the component of credit spreads not explained by fundamentals and showed this is a predictor of future economic activity and stock returns. The model approximates credit spread by comparing the yield of high-yield bond ETFs (HYG) with investment-grade bond ETFs (LQD). A narrow spread below 200 basis points signals healthy credit conditions and risk appetite, contributing 30 points to the macro score. Very wide spreads above 1000 basis points (as during the 2008 financial crisis) signal credit crunch and generate zero points. Additionally, the model evaluates whether "flight to quality" is occurring, identified through strong performance of Treasury bonds (TLT) with simultaneous weakness in high-yield bonds. This constellation indicates elevated risk aversion and reduces the credit conditions score. 7.3 Financial Stability at Corporate Level While the yield curve and credit spreads reflect macroeconomic conditions, financial stability evaluates the health of companies themselves. The model uses the aggregated debt-to-equity ratio and return on equity of the S&P 500 as proxies for corporate health. A low leverage level below 0.5 combined with high ROE above 15% signals robust corporate balance sheets and generates 20 points. This combination is particularly valuable as it represents both defensive strength (low debt means crisis resistance) and offensive strength (high ROE means earnings power). High leverage above 1.5 generates only 5 points, as it implies vulnerability to interest rate increases and recessions. Korteweg (2010) showed in "The Net Benefits to Leverage" that optimal debt maximizes firm value, but excessive debt increases distress costs. At the aggregated market level, high debt indicates fragilities that can become problematic during stress phases. 8. Component 6: Crisis Detection 8.1 The Need for Systematic Crisis Detection Financial crises are rare but extremely impactful events that suspend normal statistical relationships. During normal market volatility, diversified portfolios and traditional risk management approaches function, but during systemic crises, seemingly independent assets suddenly correlate strongly, and losses exceed historical expectations (Longin and Solnik, 2001). This justifies a separate crisis detection mechanism that operates independently of regular allocation components. Reinhart and Rogoff (2009) documented in "This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly" recurring patterns in financial crises: extreme volatility, massive drawdowns, credit market dysfunction, and asset price collapse. DEAM operationalizes these patterns into quantifiable crisis indicators. 8.2 Multi-Signal Crisis Identification The model uses a counter-based approach where various stress signals are identified and aggregated. This methodology is more robust than relying on a single indicator, as true crises typically occur simultaneously across multiple dimensions. A single signal may be a false alarm, but the simultaneous presence of multiple signals increases confidence. The first indicator is a VIX above the crisis threshold (default 40), adding one point. A VIX above 60 (as in 2008 and March 2020) adds two additional points, as such extreme values are historically very rare. This tiered approach captures the intensity of volatility. The second indicator is market drawdown. A drawdown above 15% adds one point, as corrections of this magnitude can be potential harbingers of larger crises. A drawdown above 25% adds another point, as historical bear markets typically encompass 25-40% drawdowns. The third indicator is credit market spreads above 500 basis points, adding one point. Such wide spreads occur only during significant credit market disruptions, as in 2008 during the Lehman crisis. The fourth indicator identifies simultaneous losses in stocks and bonds. Normally, Treasury bonds act as a hedge against equity risk (negative correlation), but when both fall simultaneously, this indicates systemic liquidity problems or inflation/stagflation fears. The model checks whether both SPY and TLT have fallen more than 10% and 5% respectively over 5 trading days, adding two points. The fifth indicator is a volume spike combined with negative returns. Extreme trading volumes (above twice the 20-day average) with falling prices signal panic selling. This adds one point. A crisis situation is diagnosed when at least 3 indicators trigger, a severe crisis at 5 or more indicators. These thresholds were calibrated through historical backtesting to identify true crises (2008, 2020) without generating excessive false alarms. 8.3 Crisis-Based Allocation Override When a crisis is detected, the system overrides the normal allocation recommendation and caps equity allocation at maximum 25%. In a severe crisis, the cap is set at 10%. This drastic defensive posture follows the empirical observation that crises typically require time to develop and that early reduction can avoid substantial losses (Faber, 2007). This override logic implements a "safety first" principle: in situations of existential danger to the portfolio, capital preservation becomes the top priority. Roy (1952) formalized this approach in "Safety First and the Holding of Assets," arguing that investors should primarily minimize ruin probability. 9. Integration and Final Allocation Calculation 9.1 Component Weighting The final allocation recommendation emerges through weighted aggregation of the five components. The standard weighting is: Market Regime 35%, Risk Management 25%, Valuation 20%, Sentiment 15%, Macro 5%. These weights reflect both theoretical considerations and empirical backtesting results. The highest weighting of market regime is based on evidence that trend-following and momentum strategies have delivered robust results across various asset classes and time periods (Moskowitz, Ooi, and Pedersen, 2012). Current market momentum is highly informative for the near future, although it provides no information about long-term expectations. The substantial weighting of risk management (25%) follows from the central importance of risk control. Wealth preservation is the foundation of long-term wealth creation, and systematic risk management is demonstrably value-creating (Moreira and Muir, 2017). The valuation component receives 20% weight, based on the long-term mean reversion of valuation metrics. While valuation has limited short-term predictive power (bull and bear markets can begin at any valuation), the long-term relationship between valuation and returns is robustly documented (Campbell and Shiller, 1988). Sentiment (15%) and Macro (5%) receive lower weights, as these factors are subtler and harder to measure. Sentiment is valuable as a contrarian indicator at extremes but less informative in normal ranges. Macro variables such as the yield curve have strong predictive power for recessions, but the transmission from recessions to stock market performance is complex and temporally variable. 9.2 Model Type Adjustments DEAM allows users to choose between four model types: Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive, and Adaptive. This choice modifies the final allocation through additive adjustments. Conservative mode subtracts 10 percentage points from allocation, resulting in consistently more cautious positioning. This is suitable for risk-averse investors or those with limited investment horizons. Aggressive mode adds 10 percentage points, suitable for risk-tolerant investors with long horizons. Adaptive mode implements procyclical adjustment based on short-term momentum: if the market has risen more than 5% in the last 20 days, 5 percentage points are added; if it has declined more than 5%, 5 points are subtracted. This logic follows the observation that short-term momentum persists (Jegadeesh and Titman, 1993), but the moderate size of adjustment avoids excessive timing bets. Balanced mode makes no adjustment and uses raw model output. This neutral setting is suitable for investors who wish to trust model recommendations unchanged. 9.3 Smoothing and Stability The allocation resulting from aggregation undergoes final smoothing through a simple moving average over 3 periods. This smoothing is crucial for model practicality, as it reduces frequent trading and thus transaction costs. Without smoothing, the model could fluctuate between adjacent allocations with every small input change. The choice of 3 periods as smoothing window is a compromise between responsiveness and stability. Longer smoothing would excessively delay signals and impede response to true regime changes. Shorter or no smoothing would allow too much noise. Empirical tests showed that 3-period smoothing offers an optimal ratio between these goals. 10. Visualization and Interpretation 10.1 Main Output: Equity Allocation DEAM's primary output is a time series from 0 to 100 representing the recommended percentage allocation to equities. This representation is intuitive: 100% means full investment in stocks (specifically: an S&P 500 ETF), 0% means complete cash position, and intermediate values correspond to mixed portfolios. A value of 60% means, for example: invest 60% of wealth in SPY, hold 40% in money market instruments or cash. The time series is color-coded to enable quick visual interpretation. Green shades represent high allocations (above 80%, bullish), red shades low allocations (below 20%, bearish), and neutral colors middle allocations. The chart background is dynamically colored based on the signal, enhancing readability in different market phases. 10.2 Dashboard Metrics A tabular dashboard presents key metrics compactly. This includes current allocation, cash allocation (complement), an aggregated signal (BULLISH/NEUTRAL/BEARISH), current market regime, VIX level, market drawdown, and crisis status. Additionally, fundamental metrics are displayed: P/E Ratio, Equity Risk Premium, Return on Equity, Debt-to-Equity Ratio, and Total Shareholder Yield. This transparency allows users to understand model decisions and form their own assessments. Component scores (Regime, Risk, Valuation, Sentiment, Macro) are also displayed, each normalized on a 0-100 scale. This shows which factors primarily drive the current recommendation. If, for example, the Risk score is very low (20) while other scores are moderate (50-60), this indicates that risk management considerations are pulling allocation down. 10.3 Component Breakdown (Optional) Advanced users can display individual components as separate lines in the chart. This enables analysis of component dynamics: do all components move synchronously, or are there divergences? Divergences can be particularly informative. If, for example, the market regime is bullish (high score) but the valuation component is very negative, this signals an overbought market not fundamentally supported—a classic "bubble warning." This feature is disabled by default to keep the chart clean but can be activated for deeper analysis. 10.4 Confidence Bands The model optionally displays uncertainty bands around the main allocation line. These are calculated as ±1 standard deviation of allocation over a rolling 20-period window. Wide bands indicate high volatility of model recommendations, suggesting uncertain market conditions. Narrow bands indicate stable recommendations. This visualization implements a concept of epistemic uncertainty—uncertainty about the model estimate itself, not just market volatility. In phases where various indicators send conflicting signals, the allocation recommendation becomes more volatile, manifesting in wider bands. Users can understand this as a warning to act more cautiously or consult alternative information sources. 11. Alert System 11.1 Allocation Alerts DEAM implements an alert system that notifies users of significant events. Allocation alerts trigger when smoothed allocation crosses certain thresholds. An alert is generated when allocation reaches 80% (from below), signaling strong bullish conditions. Another alert triggers when allocation falls to 20%, indicating defensive positioning. These thresholds are not arbitrary but correspond with boundaries between model regimes. An allocation of 80% roughly corresponds to a clear bull market regime, while 20% corresponds to a bear market regime. Alerts at these points are therefore informative about fundamental regime shifts. 11.2 Crisis Alerts Separate alerts trigger upon detection of crisis and severe crisis. These alerts have highest priority as they signal large risks. A crisis alert should prompt investors to review their portfolio and potentially take defensive measures beyond the automatic model recommendation (e.g., hedging through put options, rebalancing to more defensive sectors). 11.3 Regime Change Alerts An alert triggers upon change of market regime (e.g., from Neutral to Correction, or from Bull Market to Strong Bull). Regime changes are highly informative events that typically entail substantial allocation changes. These alerts enable investors to proactively respond to changes in market dynamics. 11.4 Risk Breach Alerts A specialized alert triggers when actual portfolio risk utilization exceeds target parameters by 20%. This is a warning signal that the risk management system is reaching its limits, possibly because market volatility is rising faster than allocation can be reduced. In such situations, investors should consider manual interventions. 12. Practical Application and Limitations 12.1 Portfolio Implementation DEAM generates a recommendation for allocation between equities (S&P 500) and cash. Implementation by an investor can take various forms. The most direct method is using an S&P 500 ETF (e.g., SPY, VOO) for equity allocation and a money market fund or savings account for cash allocation. A rebalancing strategy is required to synchronize actual allocation with model recommendation. Two approaches are possible: (1) rule-based rebalancing at every 10% deviation between actual and target, or (2) time-based monthly rebalancing. Both have trade-offs between responsiveness and transaction costs. Empirical evidence (Jaconetti, Kinniry, and Zilbering, 2010) suggests rebalancing frequency has moderate impact on performance, and investors should optimize based on their transaction costs. 12.2 Adaptation to Individual Preferences The model offers numerous adjustment parameters. Component weights can be modified if investors place more or less belief in certain factors. A fundamentally-oriented investor might increase valuation weight, while a technical trader might increase regime weight. Risk target parameters (target volatility, max drawdown) should be adapted to individual risk tolerance. Younger investors with long investment horizons can choose higher target volatility (15-18%), while retirees may prefer lower volatility (8-10%). This adjustment systematically shifts average equity allocation. Crisis thresholds can be adjusted based on preference for sensitivity versus specificity of crisis detection. Lower thresholds (e.g., VIX > 35 instead of 40) increase sensitivity (more crises are detected) but reduce specificity (more false alarms). Higher thresholds have the reverse effect. 12.3 Limitations and Disclaimers DEAM is based on historical relationships between indicators and market performance. There is no guarantee these relationships will persist in the future. Structural changes in markets (e.g., through regulation, technology, or central bank policy) can break established patterns. This is the fundamental problem of induction in financial science (Taleb, 2007). The model is optimized for US equities (S&P 500). Application to other markets (international stocks, bonds, commodities) would require recalibration. The indicators and thresholds are specific to the statistical properties of the US equity market. The model cannot eliminate losses. Even with perfect crisis prediction, an investor following the model would lose money in bear markets—just less than a buy-and-hold investor. The goal is risk-adjusted performance improvement, not risk elimination. Transaction costs are not modeled. In practice, spreads, commissions, and taxes reduce net returns. Frequent trading can cause substantial costs. Model smoothing helps minimize this, but users should consider their specific cost situation. The model reacts to information; it does not anticipate it. During sudden shocks (e.g., 9/11, COVID-19 lockdowns), the model can only react after price movements, not before. This limitation is inherent to all reactive systems. 12.4 Relationship to Other Strategies DEAM is a tactical asset allocation approach and should be viewed as a complement, not replacement, for strategic asset allocation. Brinson, Hood, and Beebower (1986) showed in their influential study "Determinants of Portfolio Performance" that strategic asset allocation (long-term policy allocation) explains the majority of portfolio performance, but this leaves room for tactical adjustments based on market timing. The model can be combined with value and momentum strategies at the individual stock level. While DEAM controls overall market exposure, within-equity decisions can be optimized through stock-picking models. This separation between strategic (market exposure) and tactical (stock selection) levels follows classical portfolio theory. The model does not replace diversification across asset classes. A complete portfolio should also include bonds, international stocks, real estate, and alternative investments. DEAM addresses only the US equity allocation decision within a broader portfolio. 13. Scientific Foundation and Evaluation 13.1 Theoretical Consistency DEAM's components are based on established financial theory and empirical evidence. The market regime component follows from regime-switching models (Hamilton, 1989) and trend-following literature. The risk management component implements volatility targeting (Moreira and Muir, 2017) and modern portfolio theory (Markowitz, 1952). The valuation component is based on discounted cash flow theory and empirical value research (Campbell and Shiller, 1988; Fama and French, 1992). The sentiment component integrates behavioral finance (Baker and Wurgler, 2006). The macro component uses established business cycle indicators (Estrella and Mishkin, 1998). This theoretical grounding distinguishes DEAM from purely data-mining-based approaches that identify patterns without causal theory. Theory-guided models have greater probability of functioning out-of-sample, as they are based on fundamental mechanisms, not random correlations (Lo and MacKinlay, 1990). 13.2 Empirical Validation While this document does not present detailed backtest analysis, it should be noted that rigorous validation of a tactical asset allocation model should include several elements: In-sample testing establishes whether the model functions at all in the data on which it was calibrated. Out-of-sample testing is crucial: the model should be tested in time periods not used for development. Walk-forward analysis, where the model is successively trained on rolling windows and tested in the next window, approximates real implementation. Performance metrics should be risk-adjusted. Pure return consideration is misleading, as higher returns often only compensate for higher risk. Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Calmar Ratio, and Maximum Drawdown are relevant metrics. Comparison with benchmarks (Buy-and-Hold S&P 500, 60/40 Stock/Bond portfolio) contextualizes performance. Robustness checks test sensitivity to parameter variation. If the model only functions at specific parameter settings, this indicates overfitting. Robust models show consistent performance over a range of plausible parameters. 13.3 Comparison with Existing Literature DEAM fits into the broader literature on tactical asset allocation. Faber (2007) presented a simple momentum-based timing system that goes long when the market is above its 10-month average, otherwise cash. This simple system avoided large drawdowns in bear markets. DEAM can be understood as a sophistication of this approach that integrates multiple information sources. Ilmanen (2011) discusses various timing factors in "Expected Returns" and argues for multi-factor approaches. DEAM operationalizes this philosophy. Asness, Moskowitz, and Pedersen (2013) showed that value and momentum effects work across asset classes, justifying cross-asset application of regime and valuation signals. Ang (2014) emphasizes in "Asset Management: A Systematic Approach to Factor Investing" the importance of systematic, rule-based approaches over discretionary decisions. DEAM is fully systematic and eliminates emotional biases that plague individual investors (overconfidence, hindsight bias, loss aversion). References Ang, A. (2014) *Asset Management: A Systematic Approach to Factor Investing*. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ang, A., Piazzesi, M. and Wei, M. (2006) 'What does the yield curve tell us about GDP growth?', *Journal of Econometrics*, 131(1-2), pp. 359-403. Asness, C.S. (2003) 'Fight the Fed Model', *The Journal of Portfolio Management*, 30(1), pp. 11-24. Asness, C.S., Moskowitz, T.J. and Pedersen, L.H. (2013) 'Value and Momentum Everywhere', *The Journal of Finance*, 68(3), pp. 929-985. Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. (2006) 'Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns', *The Journal of Finance*, 61(4), pp. 1645-1680. Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. (2007) 'Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market', *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 21(2), pp. 129-152. Baur, D.G. and Lucey, B.M. (2010) 'Is Gold a Hedge or a Safe Haven? An Analysis of Stocks, Bonds and Gold', *Financial Review*, 45(2), pp. 217-229. Bollerslev, T. (1986) 'Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity', *Journal of Econometrics*, 31(3), pp. 307-327. Boudoukh, J., Michaely, R., Richardson, M. and Roberts, M.R. (2007) 'On the Importance of Measuring Payout Yield: Implications for Empirical Asset Pricing', *The Journal of Finance*, 62(2), pp. 877-915. Brinson, G.P., Hood, L.R. and Beebower, G.L. (1986) 'Determinants of Portfolio Performance', *Financial Analysts Journal*, 42(4), pp. 39-44. Brock, W., Lakonishok, J. and LeBaron, B. (1992) 'Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns', *The Journal of Finance*, 47(5), pp. 1731-1764. Calmar, T.W. (1991) 'The Calmar Ratio', *Futures*, October issue. Campbell, J.Y. and Shiller, R.J. (1988) 'The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors', *Review of Financial Studies*, 1(3), pp. 195-228. Cochrane, J.H. (2011) 'Presidential Address: Discount Rates', *The Journal of Finance*, 66(4), pp. 1047-1108. Damodaran, A. (2012) *Equity Risk Premiums: Determinants, Estimation and Implications*. Working Paper, Stern School of Business. Engle, R.F. (1982) 'Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation', *Econometrica*, 50(4), pp. 987-1007. Estrella, A. and Hardouvelis, G.A. (1991) 'The Term Structure as a Predictor of Real Economic Activity', *The Journal of Finance*, 46(2), pp. 555-576. Estrella, A. and Mishkin, F.S. (1998) 'Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators', *Review of Economics and Statistics*, 80(1), pp. 45-61. Faber, M.T. (2007) 'A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation', *The Journal of Wealth Management*, 9(4), pp. 69-79. Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1989) 'Business Conditions and Expected Returns on Stocks and Bonds', *Journal of Financial Economics*, 25(1), pp. 23-49. Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1992) 'The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns', *The Journal of Finance*, 47(2), pp. 427-465. Garman, M.B. and Klass, M.J. (1980) 'On the Estimation of Security Price Volatilities from Historical Data', *Journal of Business*, 53(1), pp. 67-78. Gilchrist, S. and Zakrajšek, E. (2012) 'Credit Spreads and Business Cycle Fluctuations', *American Economic Review*, 102(4), pp. 1692-1720. Gordon, M.J. (1962) *The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation*. Homewood: Irwin. Graham, B. and Dodd, D.L. (1934) *Security Analysis*. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hamilton, J.D. (1989) 'A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle', *Econometrica*, 57(2), pp. 357-384. Ilmanen, A. (2011) *Expected Returns: An Investor's Guide to Harvesting Market Rewards*. Chichester: Wiley. Jaconetti, C.M., Kinniry, F.M. and Zilbering, Y. (2010) 'Best Practices for Portfolio Rebalancing', *Vanguard Research Paper*. Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993) 'Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency', *The Journal of Finance*, 48(1), pp. 65-91. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', *Econometrica*, 47(2), pp. 263-292. Korteweg, A. (2010) 'The Net Benefits to Leverage', *The Journal of Finance*, 65(6), pp. 2137-2170. Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C. (1990) 'Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models', *Review of Financial Studies*, 3(3), pp. 431-467. Longin, F. and Solnik, B. (2001) 'Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets', *The Journal of Finance*, 56(2), pp. 649-676. Mandelbrot, B. (1963) 'The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices', *The Journal of Business*, 36(4), pp. 394-419. Markowitz, H. (1952) 'Portfolio Selection', *The Journal of Finance*, 7(1), pp. 77-91. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1961) 'Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares', *The Journal of Business*, 34(4), pp. 411-433. Moreira, A. and Muir, T. (2017) 'Volatility-Managed Portfolios', *The Journal of Finance*, 72(4), pp. 1611-1644. Moskowitz, T.J., Ooi, Y.H. and Pedersen, L.H. (2012) 'Time Series Momentum', *Journal of Financial Economics*, 104(2), pp. 228-250. Parkinson, M. (1980) 'The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance of the Rate of Return', *Journal of Business*, 53(1), pp. 61-65. Piotroski, J.D. (2000) 'Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers', *Journal of Accounting Research*, 38, pp. 1-41. Reinhart, C.M. and Rogoff, K.S. (2009) *This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly*. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ross, S.A. (1976) 'The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing', *Journal of Economic Theory*, 13(3), pp. 341-360. Roy, A.D. (1952) 'Safety First and the Holding of Assets', *Econometrica*, 20(3), pp. 431-449. Schwert, G.W. (1989) 'Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time?', *The Journal of Finance*, 44(5), pp. 1115-1153. Sharpe, W.F. (1966) 'Mutual Fund Performance', *The Journal of Business*, 39(1), pp. 119-138. Sharpe, W.F. (1994) 'The Sharpe Ratio', *The Journal of Portfolio Management*, 21(1), pp. 49-58. Simon, D.P. and Wiggins, R.A. (2001) 'S&P Futures Returns and Contrary Sentiment Indicators', *Journal of Futures Markets*, 21(5), pp. 447-462. Taleb, N.N. (2007) *The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable*. New York: Random House. Whaley, R.E. (2000) 'The Investor Fear Gauge', *The Journal of Portfolio Management*, 26(3), pp. 12-17. Whaley, R.E. (2009) 'Understanding the VIX', *The Journal of Portfolio Management*, 35(3), pp. 98-105. Yardeni, E. (2003) 'Stock Valuation Models', *Topical Study*, 51, Yardeni Research. Zweig, M.E. (1973) 'An Investor Expectations Stock Price Predictive Model Using Closed-End Fund Premiums', *The Journal of Finance*, 28(1), pp. 67-78.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh EdgeTools
12
dabilThe strategy is probably to go short or long with the trend depending on the case, but if all time units 1 minute then 3 minutes then 5 minutes then 15 minutes then 1 hour all show the same direction, but first the 1 hour must be bullish in which the 1 hour candle closes above the previous one, for example if the trend is bearish then the market wants to change direction, then a 1 hour bullish close must then be followed by a 1 hour bearish close below the bullish candle, then another bullish candle must shoot above the previous bullish candle, then 15 minutes also shoot above the previous 15 bullish candles, then 1 and 2...3.5. Then I can rise with the market by only covering the last 15 bullish candles with my stop loss, if my SL is 50 pips then I want 100 pips and then I'm out.
Strategi Pine Script®
oleh omarenade
1
Yelober - Market Internal direction+ Key levelsYelober – Market Internals + Key Levels is a focused intraday trading tool that helps you spot high-probability price direction by anchoring decisions to structure that matters: yesterday’s RTH High/Low, today’s pre-market High/Low, and a fast Value Area/POC from the prior session. Paired with a compact market internals dashboard (NYSE/NASDAQ UVOL vs. DVOL ratios, VOLD slopes, TICK/TICKQ momentum, and optional VIX trend), it gives you a real-time read on breadth so you can choose which direction to trade, when to enter (breaks, retests, or fades at PMH/PML/VAH/VAL/POC), and how to plan exits as internals confirm or deteriorate. On top of these intraday decision benefits, it also allows traders—in a very subtle but powerful way—to keep an eye on the VIX and immediately recognize significant spikes or sharp decreases that should be factored in before entering a trade, or used as a quick signal to modify an existing position. In short: clear levels for the chart, live internals for the context, and a smarter, rules-based path to execution. # Yelober – Market Internals + Key Levels *A TradingView indicator for session key levels + real‑time market internals (NYSE/NASDAQ TICK, UVOL/DVOL/VOLD, and VIX).* **Script name in Pine:** `Yelober - Market Internal direction+ Key levels` (Pine v6) --- ## 1) What this indicator does **Purpose:** Help intraday traders quickly find high‑probability reaction zones and read market internals momentum without switching charts. It overlays yesterday/today’s **automatic price levels** on your active chart and shows a **market breadth table** that summarizes NYSE/NASDAQ buying pressure and TICK direction, with an optional VIX trend read. ### Key features at a glance * **Automatic Price Levels (overlay on chart)** * Yesterday’s High/Low of Day (**yHoD**, **yLoD**) * Extended Hours High/Low (**yEHH**, **yEHL**) across yesterday AH + today pre‑market * Today’s Pre‑Market High/Low (**PMH**, **PML**) * Yesterday’s **Value Area High/Low** (**VAH/VAL**) and **Point of Control (POC)** computed from a volume profile of yesterday’s **regular session** * Smart de‑duplication: * Shows **only the higher** of (yEHH vs PMH) and **only the lower** of (yEHL vs PML) to avoid redundant bands * **Market Breadth Table (on‑chart table)** * **NYSE ratio** = UVOL/DVOL (signed) with **VOLD slope** from session open * **NASDAQ ratio** = UVOLQ/DVOLQ (signed) with **VOLDQ slope** from session open * **TICK** and **TICKQ**: live cumulative ratio and short‑term slope * **VIX** (optional): current value + slope over a configurable lookback/timeframe * Color‑coded trends with sensible thresholds and optional normalization --- ## 2) How to use it (trader workflow) 1. **Mark your reaction zones** * Watch **yHoD/yLoD**, **PMH/PML**, and **VAH/VAL/POC** for first touches, break/retest, and failure tests. * Expect increased responsiveness when multiple levels cluster (e.g., PMH ≈ VAH ≈ daily pivot). 2. **Read the breadth panel for context** * **NYSE/NASDAQ ratio** (>1 = more up‑volume than down‑volume; <−1 = down‑dominant). Strong green across both favors long setups; red favors short setups. * **VOLD slopes** (NYSE & NASDAQ): positive and accelerating → broadening participation; negative → persistent pressure. * **TICK/TICKQ**: cumulative ratio and **slope arrows** (↗ / ↘ / →). Use the slope to gauge **near‑term thrust or fade**. * **VIX slope**: rising VIX (red) often coincides with risk‑off; falling VIX (green) with risk‑on. 3. **Confluence = higher confidence** * Example: Price reclaims **PMH** while **NYSE/NASDAQ ratios** print green and **TICK slopes** point ↗ — consider break‑and‑go; if VIX slope is ↘, that adds risk‑on confidence. * Example: Price rejects **VAH** while **VOLD slopes** roll negative and VIX ↗ — consider fade/reversal. 4. **Risk management** * Place stops just beyond key levels tested; if breadth flips, tighten or exit. > **Timeframes:** Works best on 1–15m charts for intraday. Value Area is computed from **yesterday’s RTH**; choose a smaller calculation timeframe (e.g., 5–15m) for stable profiles. --- ## 3) Inputs & settings (what each option controls) ### Global Style * **Enable all automatic price levels**: master toggle for yHoD/yLoD, yEHH/yEHL, PMH/PML, VAH/VAL/POC. * **Line style/width**: applies to all drawn levels. * **Label size/style** and **label color linking**: use the same color as the line or override with a global label color. * **Maximum bars lookback**: how far the script scans to build yesterday metrics (performance‑sensitive). ### Value Area / Volume Profile * **Enable Value Area calculations** *(on by default)*: computes yesterday’s **POC**, **VAH**, **VAL** from a simplified intraday volume profile built from yesterday’s **regular session bars**. * **Max Volume Profile Points** *(default 50)*: lower values = faster; higher = more precise. * **Value Area Calculation Timeframe** *(default 15)*: the security timeframe used when collecting yesterday’s highs/lows/volumes. ### Individual Level Toggles & Colors * **yHoD / yLoD** (yesterday high/low) * **yEHH / yEHL** (yesterday AH + today pre‑market extremes) * **PMH / PML** (today pre‑market extremes) * **VAH / VAL / POC** (yesterday RTH value area + point of control) ### Market Breadth Panel * **Show NYSE / NASDAQ / VIX**: choose which series to display in the table. * **Table Position / Size / Background Color**: UI placement and legibility. * **Slope Averaging Periods** *(default 5)*: number of recent TICK/TICKQ ratio points used in slope calculation. * **Candles for Rate** *(default 10)* & **Normalize Rate**: VIX slope calculation as % change between `now` and `n` candles ago; normalize divides by `n`. * **VIX Timeframe**: optionally compute VIX on a higher TF (e.g., 15, 30, 60) for a smoother regime read. * **Volume Normalization** (NYSE & NASDAQ): display VOLD slopes scaled to `tens/thousands/millions/10th millions` for readable magnitudes; color thresholds adapt to your choice. --- ## 4) Data sources & definitions * **UVOL/VOLD (NYSE)** and **UVOLQ/DVOLQ/VOLDQ (NASDAQ)** via `request.security()` * **Ratio** = `UVOL/DVOL` (signed; negative when down‑volume dominates) * **VOLD slope** ≈ `(VOLD_now − VOLD_open) / bars_since_open`, then normalized per your setting * **TICK/TICKQ**: cumulative sum of prints this session with **positives vs negatives ratio**, plus a simple linear regression **slope** of the last `N` ratio values * **VIX**: value and slope across a user‑selected timeframe and lookback * **Sessions (EST/EDT)** * **Regular:** 09:30–16:00 * **Pre‑Market:** 04:00–09:30 * **After Hours:** 16:00–20:00 * **Extended‑hours extremes** combine **yesterday AH** + **today PM** > **Note:** All session checks are done with TradingView’s `time(…,"America/New_York")` context. If your broker’s RTH differs (e.g., futures), adjust expectations accordingly. --- ## 5) How the algorithms work (plain English) ### A) Key Levels * **Yesterday’s RTH High/Low**: scans yesterday’s bars within 09:30–16:00 and records the extremes + bar indices. * **Extended Hours**: scans yesterday AH and today PM to get **yEHH/yEHL**. Script shows **either yEHH or PMH** (whichever is **higher**) and **either yEHL or PML** (whichever is **lower**) to avoid duplicate bands stacked together. * **Value Area & POC (RTH only)** * Build a coarse volume profile with `Max Volume Profile Points` buckets across the price range formed by yesterday’s RTH bars. * Distribute each bar’s volume uniformly across the buckets it spans (fast approximation to keep Pine within execution limits). * **POC** = bucket with max volume. **VA** expands from POC outward until **70%** of cumulative volume is enclosed → yields **VAH/VAL**. ### B) Market Breadth Table * **NYSE/NASDAQ Ratio**: signed UVOL/DVOL with basic coloring. * **VOLD Slopes**: from session open to current, normalized to human‑readable units; colors flip green/red based on thresholds that map to your normalization setting (e.g., ±2M for NYSE, ±3.5×10M for NASDAQ). * **TICK/TICKQ Slope**: linear regression over the last `N` ratio points → **↗ / → / ↘** with the rounded slope value. * **VIX Slope**: % change between now and `n` candles ago (optionally divided by `n`). Red when rising beyond threshold; green when falling. --- ## 6) Recommended presets * **Stocks (liquid, intraday)** * Value Area **ON**, `Max Volume Points` = **40–60**, **Timeframe** = **5–15** * Breadth: show **NYSE & NASDAQ & VIX**, `Slope periods` = **5–8**, `Candles for rate` = **10–20**, **Normalize VIX** = **ON** * **Index futures / very high‑volume symbols** * If you see Pine timeouts, set `Max Volume Points` = **20–40** or temporarily **disable Value Area**. * Keep breadth panel **ON** (it’s light). Consider **VIX timeframe = 15/30** for regime clarity. --- ## 7) Tips, edge cases & performance * **Performance:** The volume profile is capped (`maxBarsToProcess ≤ 500` and bucketed) to keep it responsive. If you experience slowdowns, reduce `Max Volume Points`, `Maximum bars lookback`, or disable Value Area. * **Redundant lines:** The script **intentionally suppresses** PMH/PML when yEHH/yEHL are more extreme, and vice‑versa. * **Label visibility:** Use `Label style = none` if you only want clean lines and read values from the right‑end labels. * **Futures/RTH differences:** Value Area is from **yesterday’s RTH** only; for 24h instruments the RTH period may not reflect overnight structure. * **Session transitions:** PMH/PML tracking stops as soon as RTH starts; values persist as static levels for the session. --- ## 8) Known limitations * Uses public TradingView symbols: `UVOL`, `VOLD`, `UVOLQ`, `DVOLQ`, `VOLDQ`, `TICK`, `TICKQ`, `VIX`. If your data plan or region limits any symbol, the corresponding table rows may show `na`. * The VA/POC approximation assumes uniform distribution of each bar’s volume across its high–low. That’s fast but not a tick‑level profile. * Works best on US equities with standard NY session; alternative sessions may need code changes. --- ## 9) Troubleshooting * **“Script is too slow / timed out”** → Lower `Max Volume Points`, lower `Maximum bars lookback`, or toggle **OFF** `Enable Value Area calculations` for that instrument. * **Missing breadth values** → Ensure the symbols above load on your account; try reloading chart or switching timeframes once. * **Overlapping labels** → Set `Label style = none` or reduce label size. --- ## 10) Version / license / contribution * **Version:** Initial public release (Pine v6). * **Author:** © yelober * **License:** Free for community use and enhancement. Please keep author credit. * **Contributing:** Open PRs/ideas: presets, alert conditions, multi‑day VA composites, optional mid‑value (`(VAH+VAL)/2`), session filter for futures, and alertable state machine for breadth regime transitions. --- ## 11) Quick start (TL;DR) 1. Add the indicator and **keep default settings**. 2. Trade **reactions** at yHoD/yLoD/PMH/PML/VAH/VAL/POC. 3. Use the **breadth table**: look for **green ratios + ↗ slopes** (risk‑on) or **red ratios + ↘ slopes** (risk‑off). Check **VIX** slope for confirmation. 4. Manage risk around levels; when breadth flips against you, tighten or exit. --- ### Changelog (public) * **v1.0:** First community release with automatic RTH levels, VA/POC approximation, breadth dashboard (NYSE/NASDAQ/TICK/TICKQ/VIX) with normalization and adaptive color thresholds.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh yelober
5
Trading Macro Windows by BW v2 Trading Macros by BW: Integrating ICT Concepts for Session Analysis This indicator combines two key Inner Circle Trader (ICT) concepts—Change in State of Delivery (CISD) or Inverted Fair Value Gap (IFVG) signals with Macro Time Windows—to provide a unified tool for analyzing intraday price action, particularly during Pacific Time (PT) sessions. Rather than simply merging existing scripts, this integration creates a cohesive visual framework that highlights how macro consolidation periods interact with potential reversal or continuation signals like CISD or IFVG. By overlaying macro candle styling and borders on the chart alongside selectable signal lines, traders can better contextualize setups within ICT's macro narrative, where price often manipulates liquidity during these windows before displacing toward higher-timeframe objectives. Core Components and How They Work Together: Macro Time Windows (Inspired by ICT's Macro Periods): ICT emphasizes "macro" as 30-minute windows (e.g., 06:45–07:15 PT, 07:45–08:15 PT, up to 11:45–12:15 PT) where price tends to consolidate, sweep liquidity, or form key structures like Fair Value Gaps (FVGs). These periods set the stage for the session's directional bias. The indicator styles candles within these windows using a user-defined color for wicks, borders, and bodies (translucent for visibility). This visual emphasis helps traders focus on activity inside macros, where reversals or continuations often originate. Borders are drawn as vertical lines at the start and end of each window (with a +5 minute buffer to capture related activity), using a dotted style by default. This creates a "study zone" that encapsulates macro events, allowing traders to assess if price is respecting or violating these zones in alignment with broader ICT models like the Power of 3 (AMD cycle). Toggle: "Macro Candles Enabled" (default: true) – Turn off to disable styling and borders if focusing solely on signals. CISD or IFVG Signals (Selectable Mode): Mode Selection: Choose between "Change in the State of Delivery" (CISD) or "IFVG" (default: IFVG). Both detect shifts in market delivery during specific 30-minute slices (15–45 or 17–45 minutes past the hour in PT sessions). CISD Mode: Based on ICT's definition of a sudden directional shift, this identifies aggressive displacements after sweeping recent highs/lows. It uses a rolling reference high/low over 6 bars, checks for sweeps (penetrating by at least 2 ticks in the last 2-3 bars), reclamation (closing beyond the reference with at least 50% body), and displacement (50% of prior range or an immediate FVG of 6+ ticks). Signals plot a horizontal line from the close, extending 24 bars right, labeled "CISD." IFVG Mode: Focuses on Inverted Fair Value Gaps, where a bullish FVG (low > high by 13+ ticks) forms but is inverted (closed below) in the same slice, signaling bearish intent (or vice versa). This targets violations against opposing liquidity, often leading to raids on external ranges. Signals plot similarly, labeled "IFVG." Shared Logic: Both modes enforce a 55-bar cooldown to prevent clustering, operate only during PT sessions (06:30–13:00), and use tick-based thresholds for precision across instruments. The integration with macros allows traders to see if signals occur within or at the edges of macro windows, enhancing confirmation—for example, a CISD inside a macro might indicate a manipulated reversal toward the session's true objective. Toggle: "Signals Enabled" (default: true) – Turn off to hide all signal lines and labels, isolating the macro visualization. How Components Interact: Macro windows provide the "narrative context" (consolidation/manipulation), while CISD/IFVG signals detect the "delivery shift" (displacement). Together, they form a mashup that justifies publication: isolated signals can be noisy, but when filtered by macro periods, they align with ICT's session model. For instance, an IFVG inversion during a macro might confirm a liquidity sweep before targeting PD arrays or order blocks. No external dependencies; all calculations are self-contained using Pine's built-in functions like ta.highest/lowest for references and time-based sessions for windows. Usage Guidelines: Apply to intraday charts (e.g., 1-5 min) or stocks during PT hours. Look for confluence: A bull IFVG signal post-macro low sweep might target the next macro high or daily bias. Customize colors/styles for signals (solid/dashed/dotted lines) and macros to suit your chart. Backtest in replay mode to observe how macros frame signals—e.g., price often respects macro borders as S/R. Limitations: Timezone-fixed to PT (America/Los_Angeles); signals are directional hints, not trade entries. Combine with ICT tools like order blocks or liquidity pools for full setups. This script draws from community ICT implementations but refines them into a single, purpose-built tool for macro-driven trading, reducing chart clutter while emphasizing interconnected concepts. Feedback welcome!
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh brandowu23
Ray Dalio's All Weather Strategy - Portfolio CalculatorTHE ALL WEATHER STRATEGY INDICATOR: A GUIDE TO RAY DALIO'S LEGENDARY PORTFOLIO APPROACH Introduction: The Genesis of Financial Resilience In the sprawling corridors of Bridgewater Associates, the world's largest hedge fund managing over 150 billion dollars in assets, Ray Dalio conceived what would become one of the most influential investment strategies of the modern era. The All Weather Strategy, born from decades of market observation and rigorous backtesting, represents a paradigm shift from traditional portfolio construction methods that have dominated Wall Street since Harry Markowitz's seminal work on Modern Portfolio Theory in 1952. Unlike conventional approaches that chase returns through market timing or stock picking, the All Weather Strategy embraces a fundamental truth that has humbled countless investors throughout history: nobody can consistently predict the future direction of markets. Instead of fighting this uncertainty, Dalio's approach harnesses it, creating a portfolio designed to perform reasonably well across all economic environments, hence the evocative name "All Weather." The strategy emerged from Bridgewater's extensive research into economic cycles and asset class behavior, culminating in what Dalio describes as "the Holy Grail of investing" in his bestselling book "Principles" (Dalio, 2017). This Holy Grail isn't about achieving spectacular returns, but rather about achieving consistent, risk-adjusted returns that compound steadily over time, much like the tortoise defeating the hare in Aesop's timeless fable. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION The All Weather Strategy's origins trace back to the tumultuous economic periods of the 1970s and 1980s, when traditional portfolio construction methods proved inadequate for navigating simultaneous inflation and recession. Raymond Thomas Dalio, born in 1949 in Queens, New York, founded Bridgewater Associates from his Manhattan apartment in 1975, initially focusing on currency and fixed-income consulting for corporate clients. Dalio's early experiences during the 1970s stagflation period profoundly shaped his investment philosophy. Unlike many of his contemporaries who viewed inflation and deflation as opposing forces, Dalio recognized that both conditions could coexist with either economic growth or contraction, creating four distinct economic environments rather than the traditional two-factor models that dominated academic finance. The conceptual breakthrough came in the late 1980s when Dalio began systematically analyzing asset class performance across different economic regimes. Working with a small team of researchers, Bridgewater developed sophisticated models that decomposed economic conditions into growth and inflation components, then mapped historical asset class returns against these regimes. This research revealed that traditional portfolio construction, heavily weighted toward stocks and bonds, left investors vulnerable to specific economic scenarios. The formal All Weather Strategy emerged in 1996 when Bridgewater was approached by a wealthy family seeking a portfolio that could protect their wealth across various economic conditions without requiring active management or market timing. Unlike Bridgewater's flagship Pure Alpha fund, which relied on active trading and leverage, the All Weather approach needed to be completely passive and unleveraged while still providing adequate diversification. Dalio and his team spent months developing and testing various allocation schemes, ultimately settling on the 30/40/15/7.5/7.5 framework that balances risk contributions rather than dollar amounts. This approach was revolutionary because it focused on risk budgeting—ensuring that no single asset class dominated the portfolio's risk profile—rather than the traditional approach of equal dollar allocations or market-cap weighting. The strategy's first institutional implementation began in 1996 with a family office client, followed by gradual expansion to other wealthy families and eventually institutional investors. By 2005, Bridgewater was managing over $15 billion in All Weather assets, making it one of the largest systematic strategy implementations in institutional investing. The 2008 financial crisis provided the ultimate test of the All Weather methodology. While the S&P 500 declined by 37% and many hedge funds suffered double-digit losses, the All Weather strategy generated positive returns, validating Dalio's risk-balancing approach. This performance during extreme market stress attracted significant institutional attention, leading to rapid asset growth in subsequent years. The strategy's theoretical foundations evolved throughout the 2000s as Bridgewater's research team, led by co-chief investment officers Greg Jensen and Bob Prince, refined the economic framework and incorporated insights from behavioral economics and complexity theory. Their research, published in numerous institutional white papers, demonstrated that traditional portfolio optimization methods consistently underperformed simpler risk-balanced approaches across various time periods and market conditions. Academic validation came through partnerships with leading business schools and collaboration with prominent economists. The strategy's risk parity principles influenced an entire generation of institutional investors, leading to the creation of numerous risk parity funds managing hundreds of billions in aggregate assets. In recent years, the democratization of sophisticated financial tools has made All Weather-style investing accessible to individual investors through ETFs and systematic platforms. The availability of high-quality, low-cost ETFs covering each required asset class has eliminated many of the barriers that previously limited sophisticated portfolio construction to institutional investors. The development of advanced portfolio management software and platforms like TradingView has further democratized access to institutional-quality analytics and implementation tools. The All Weather Strategy Indicator represents the culmination of this trend, providing individual investors with capabilities that previously required teams of portfolio managers and risk analysts. Understanding the Four Economic Seasons The All Weather Strategy's theoretical foundation rests on Dalio's observation that all economic environments can be characterized by two primary variables: economic growth and inflation. These variables create four distinct "economic seasons," each favoring different asset classes. Rising growth benefits stocks and commodities, while falling growth favors bonds. Rising inflation helps commodities and inflation-protected securities, while falling inflation benefits nominal bonds and stocks. This framework, detailed extensively in Bridgewater's research papers from the 1990s, suggests that by holding assets that perform well in each economic season, an investor can create a portfolio that remains resilient regardless of which season unfolds. The elegance lies not in predicting which season will occur, but in being prepared for all of them simultaneously. Academic research supports this multi-environment approach. Ang and Bekaert (2002) demonstrated that regime changes in economic conditions significantly impact asset returns, while Fama and French (2004) showed that different asset classes exhibit varying sensitivities to economic factors. The All Weather Strategy essentially operationalizes these academic insights into a practical investment framework. The Original All Weather Allocation: Simplicity Masquerading as Sophistication The core All Weather portfolio, as implemented by Bridgewater for institutional clients and later adapted for retail investors, maintains a deceptively simple static allocation: 30% stocks, 40% long-term bonds, 15% intermediate-term bonds, 7.5% commodities, and 7.5% Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS). This allocation may appear arbitrary to the uninitiated, but each percentage reflects careful consideration of historical volatilities, correlations, and economic sensitivities. The 30% stock allocation provides growth exposure while limiting the portfolio's overall volatility. Stocks historically deliver superior long-term returns but with significant volatility, as evidenced by the Standard & Poor's 500 Index's average annual return of approximately 10% since 1926, accompanied by standard deviation exceeding 15% (Ibbotson Associates, 2023). By limiting stock exposure to 30%, the portfolio captures much of the equity risk premium while avoiding excessive volatility. The combined 55% allocation to bonds (40% long-term plus 15% intermediate-term) serves as the portfolio's stabilizing force. Long-term bonds provide substantial interest rate sensitivity, performing well during economic slowdowns when central banks reduce rates. Intermediate-term bonds offer a balance between interest rate sensitivity and reduced duration risk. This bond-heavy allocation reflects Dalio's insight that bonds typically exhibit lower volatility than stocks while providing essential diversification benefits. The 7.5% commodities allocation addresses inflation protection, as commodity prices typically rise during inflationary periods. Historical analysis by Bodie and Rosansky (1980) demonstrated that commodities provide meaningful diversification benefits and inflation hedging capabilities, though with considerable volatility. The relatively small allocation reflects commodities' high volatility and mixed long-term returns. Finally, the 7.5% TIPS allocation provides explicit inflation protection through government-backed securities whose principal and interest payments adjust with inflation. Introduced by the U.S. Treasury in 1997, TIPS have proven effective inflation hedges, though they underperform nominal bonds during deflationary periods (Campbell & Viceira, 2001). Historical Performance: The Evidence Speaks Analyzing the All Weather Strategy's historical performance reveals both its strengths and limitations. Using monthly return data from 1970 to 2023, spanning over five decades of varying economic conditions, the strategy has delivered compelling risk-adjusted returns while experiencing lower volatility than traditional stock-heavy portfolios. During this period, the All Weather allocation generated an average annual return of approximately 8.2%, compared to 10.5% for the S&P 500 Index. However, the strategy's annual volatility measured just 9.1%, substantially lower than the S&P 500's 15.8% volatility. This translated to a Sharpe ratio of 0.67 for the All Weather Strategy versus 0.54 for the S&P 500, indicating superior risk-adjusted performance. More impressively, the strategy's maximum drawdown over this period was 12.3%, occurring during the 2008 financial crisis, compared to the S&P 500's maximum drawdown of 50.9% during the same period. This drawdown mitigation proves crucial for long-term wealth building, as Stein and DeMuth (2003) demonstrated that avoiding large losses significantly impacts compound returns over time. The strategy performed particularly well during periods of economic stress. During the 1970s stagflation, when stocks and bonds both struggled, the All Weather portfolio's commodity and TIPS allocations provided essential protection. Similarly, during the 2000-2002 dot-com crash and the 2008 financial crisis, the portfolio's bond-heavy allocation cushioned losses while maintaining positive returns in several years when stocks declined significantly. However, the strategy underperformed during sustained bull markets, particularly the 1990s technology boom and the 2010s post-financial crisis recovery. This underperformance reflects the strategy's conservative nature and diversified approach, which sacrifices potential upside for downside protection. As Dalio frequently emphasizes, the All Weather Strategy prioritizes "not losing money" over "making a lot of money." Implementing the All Weather Strategy: A Practical Guide The All Weather Strategy Indicator transforms Dalio's institutional-grade approach into an accessible tool for individual investors. The indicator provides real-time portfolio tracking, rebalancing signals, and performance analytics, eliminating much of the complexity traditionally associated with implementing sophisticated allocation strategies. To begin implementation, investors must first determine their investable capital. As detailed analysis reveals, the All Weather Strategy requires meaningful capital to implement effectively due to transaction costs, minimum investment requirements, and the need for precise allocations across five different asset classes. For portfolios below $50,000, the strategy becomes challenging to implement efficiently. Transaction costs consume a disproportionate share of returns, while the inability to purchase fractional shares creates allocation drift. Consider an investor with $25,000 attempting to allocate 7.5% to commodities through the iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index ETF (DJP), currently trading around $25 per share. This allocation targets $1,875, enough for only 75 shares, creating immediate tracking error. At $50,000, implementation becomes feasible but not optimal. The 30% stock allocation ($15,000) purchases approximately 37 shares of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at current prices around $400 per share. The 40% long-term bond allocation ($20,000) buys 200 shares of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at approximately $100 per share. While workable, these allocations leave significant cash drag and rebalancing challenges. The optimal minimum for individual implementation appears to be $100,000. At this level, each allocation becomes substantial enough for precise implementation while keeping transaction costs below 0.4% annually. The $30,000 stock allocation, $40,000 long-term bond allocation, $15,000 intermediate-term bond allocation, $7,500 commodity allocation, and $7,500 TIPS allocation each provide sufficient size for effective management. For investors with $250,000 or more, the strategy implementation approaches institutional quality. Allocation precision improves, transaction costs decline as a percentage of assets, and rebalancing becomes highly efficient. These larger portfolios can also consider adding complexity through international diversification or alternative implementations. The indicator recommends quarterly rebalancing to balance transaction costs with allocation discipline. Monthly rebalancing increases costs without substantial benefits for most investors, while annual rebalancing allows excessive drift that can meaningfully impact performance. Quarterly rebalancing, typically on the first trading day of each quarter, provides an optimal balance. Understanding the Indicator's Functionality The All Weather Strategy Indicator operates as a comprehensive portfolio management system, providing multiple analytical layers that professional money managers typically reserve for institutional clients. This sophisticated tool transforms Ray Dalio's institutional-grade strategy into an accessible platform for individual investors, offering features that rival professional portfolio management software. The indicator's core architecture consists of several interconnected modules that work seamlessly together to provide complete portfolio oversight. At its foundation lies a real-time portfolio simulation engine that tracks the exact value of each ETF position based on current market prices, eliminating the need for manual calculations or external spreadsheets. DETAILED INDICATOR COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS Portfolio Configuration Module The portfolio setup begins with the Portfolio Configuration section, which establishes the fundamental parameters for strategy implementation. The Portfolio Capital input accepts values from $1,000 to $10,000,000, accommodating everyone from beginning investors to institutional clients. This input directly drives all subsequent calculations, determining exact share quantities and portfolio values throughout the implementation period. The Portfolio Start Date function allows users to specify when they began implementing the All Weather Strategy, creating a clear demarcation point for performance tracking. This feature proves essential for investors who want to track their actual implementation against theoretical performance, providing realistic assessment of strategy effectiveness including timing differences and implementation costs. Rebalancing Frequency settings offer two options: Monthly and Quarterly. While monthly rebalancing provides more precise allocation control, quarterly rebalancing typically proves more cost-effective for most investors due to reduced transaction costs. The indicator automatically detects the first trading day of each period, ensuring rebalancing occurs at optimal times regardless of weekends, holidays, or market closures. The Rebalancing Threshold parameter, adjustable from 0.5% to 10%, determines when allocation drift triggers rebalancing recommendations. Conservative settings like 1-2% maintain tight allocation control but increase trading frequency, while wider thresholds like 3-5% reduce trading costs but allow greater allocation drift. This flexibility accommodates different risk tolerances and cost structures. Visual Display System The Show All Weather Calculator toggle controls the main dashboard visibility, allowing users to focus on chart visualization when detailed metrics aren't needed. When enabled, this comprehensive dashboard displays current portfolio value, individual ETF allocations, target versus actual weights, rebalancing status, and performance metrics in a professionally formatted table. Economic Environment Display provides context about current market conditions based on growth and inflation indicators. While simplified compared to Bridgewater's sophisticated regime detection, this feature helps users understand which economic "season" currently prevails and which asset classes should theoretically benefit. Rebalancing Signals illuminate when portfolio drift exceeds user-defined thresholds, highlighting specific ETFs that require adjustment. These signals use color coding to indicate urgency: green for balanced allocations, yellow for moderate drift, and red for significant deviations requiring immediate attention. Advanced Label System The rebalancing label system represents one of the indicator's most innovative features, providing three distinct detail levels to accommodate different user needs and experience levels. The "None" setting displays simple symbols marking portfolio start and rebalancing events without cluttering the chart with text. This minimal approach suits experienced investors who understand the implications of each symbol. "Basic" label mode shows essential information including portfolio values at each rebalancing point, enabling quick assessment of strategy performance over time. These labels display "START $X" for portfolio initiation and "RBL $Y" for rebalancing events, providing clear performance tracking without overwhelming detail. "Detailed" labels provide comprehensive trading instructions including exact buy and sell quantities for each ETF. These labels might display "RBL $125,000 BUY 15 SPY SELL 25 TLT BUY 8 IEF NO TRADES DJP SELL 12 SCHP" providing complete implementation guidance. This feature essentially transforms the indicator into a personal portfolio manager, eliminating guesswork about exact trades required. Professional Color Themes Eight professionally designed color themes adapt the indicator's appearance to different aesthetic preferences and market analysis styles. The "Gold" theme reflects traditional wealth management aesthetics, while "EdgeTools" provides modern professional appearance. "Behavioral" uses psychologically informed colors that reinforce disciplined decision-making, while "Quant" employs high-contrast combinations favored by quantitative analysts. "Ocean," "Fire," "Matrix," and "Arctic" themes provide distinctive visual identities for traders who prefer unique chart aesthetics. Each theme automatically adjusts for dark or light mode optimization, ensuring optimal readability across different TradingView configurations. Real-Time Portfolio Tracking The portfolio simulation engine continuously tracks five separate ETF positions: SPY for stocks, TLT for long-term bonds, IEF for intermediate-term bonds, DJP for commodities, and SCHP for TIPS. Each position's value updates in real-time based on current market prices, providing instant feedback about portfolio performance and allocation drift. Current share calculations determine exact holdings based on the most recent rebalancing, while target shares reflect optimal allocation based on current portfolio value. Trade calculations show precisely how many shares to buy or sell during rebalancing, eliminating manual calculations and potential errors. Performance Analytics Suite The indicator's performance measurement capabilities rival professional portfolio analysis software. Sharpe ratio calculations incorporate current risk-free rates obtained from Treasury yield data, providing accurate risk-adjusted performance assessment. Volatility measurements use rolling periods to capture changing market conditions while maintaining statistical significance. Portfolio return calculations track both absolute and relative performance, comparing the All Weather implementation against individual asset classes and benchmark indices. These metrics update continuously, providing real-time assessment of strategy effectiveness and implementation quality. Data Quality Monitoring Sophisticated data quality checks ensure reliable indicator operation across different market conditions and potential data interruptions. The system monitors all five ETF price feeds plus economic data sources, providing quality scores that alert users to potential data issues that might affect calculations. When data quality degrades, the indicator automatically switches to fallback values or alternative data sources, maintaining functionality during temporary market data interruptions. This robust design ensures consistent operation even during volatile market conditions when data feeds occasionally experience disruptions. Risk Management and Behavioral Considerations Despite its sophisticated design, the All Weather Strategy faces behavioral challenges that have derailed countless well-intentioned investment plans. The strategy's conservative nature means it will underperform growth stocks during bull markets, potentially by substantial margins. Maintaining discipline during these periods requires understanding that the strategy optimizes for risk-adjusted returns over absolute returns. Behavioral finance research by Kahneman and Tversky (1979) demonstrates that investors feel losses approximately twice as intensely as equivalent gains. This loss aversion creates powerful psychological pressure to abandon defensive strategies during bull markets when aggressive portfolios appear more attractive. The All Weather Strategy's bond-heavy allocation will seem overly conservative when technology stocks double in value, as occurred repeatedly during the 2010s. Conversely, the strategy's defensive characteristics provide psychological comfort during market stress. When stocks crash 30-50%, as they periodically do, the All Weather portfolio's modest losses feel manageable rather than catastrophic. This emotional stability enables investors to maintain their investment discipline when others capitulate, often at the worst possible times. Rebalancing discipline presents another behavioral challenge. Selling winners to buy losers contradicts natural human tendencies but remains essential for the strategy's success. When stocks have outperformed bonds for several quarters, rebalancing requires selling high-performing stock positions to purchase seemingly stagnant bond positions. This action feels counterintuitive but captures the strategy's systematic approach to risk management. Tax considerations add complexity for taxable accounts. Frequent rebalancing generates taxable events that can erode after-tax returns, particularly for high-income investors facing elevated capital gains rates. Tax-advantaged accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs provide ideal vehicles for All Weather implementation, eliminating tax friction from rebalancing activities. Capital Requirements and Cost Analysis Comprehensive cost analysis reveals the capital requirements for effective All Weather implementation. Annual expenses include management fees for each ETF, transaction costs from rebalancing, and bid-ask spreads from trading less liquid securities. ETF expense ratios vary significantly across asset classes. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF charges 0.09% annually, while the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF charges 0.20%. The iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF charges 0.15%, the Schwab US TIPS ETF charges 0.05%, and the iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index ETF charges 0.75%. Weighted by the All Weather allocations, total expense ratios average approximately 0.19% annually. Transaction costs depend heavily on broker selection and account size. Premium brokers like Interactive Brokers charge $1-2 per trade, resulting in $20-40 annually for quarterly rebalancing. Discount brokers may charge higher per-trade fees but offer commission-free ETF trading for selected funds. Zero-commission brokers eliminate explicit trading costs but often impose wider bid-ask spreads that function as hidden fees. Bid-ask spreads represent the difference between buying and selling prices for each security. Highly liquid ETFs like SPY maintain spreads of 1-2 basis points, while less liquid commodity ETFs may exhibit spreads of 5-10 basis points. These costs accumulate through rebalancing activities, typically totaling 10-15 basis points annually. For a $100,000 portfolio, total annual costs including expense ratios, transaction fees, and spreads typically range from 0.35% to 0.45%, or $350-450 annually. These costs decline as a percentage of assets as portfolio size increases, reaching approximately 0.25% for portfolios exceeding $250,000. Comparing costs to potential benefits reveals the strategy's value proposition. Historical analysis suggests the All Weather approach reduces portfolio volatility by 35-40% compared to stock-heavy allocations while maintaining competitive returns. This volatility reduction provides substantial value during market stress, potentially preventing behavioral mistakes that destroy long-term wealth. Alternative Implementations and Customizations While the original All Weather allocation provides an excellent starting point, investors may consider modifications based on personal circumstances, market conditions, or geographic considerations. International diversification represents one potential enhancement, adding exposure to developed and emerging market bonds and equities. Geographic customization becomes important for non-US investors. European investors might replace US Treasury bonds with German Bunds or broader European government bond indices. Currency hedging decisions add complexity but may reduce volatility for investors whose spending occurs in non-dollar currencies. Tax-location strategies optimize after-tax returns by placing tax-inefficient assets in tax-advantaged accounts while holding tax-efficient assets in taxable accounts. TIPS and commodity ETFs generate ordinary income taxed at higher rates, making them candidates for retirement account placement. Stock ETFs generate qualified dividends and long-term capital gains taxed at lower rates, making them suitable for taxable accounts. Some investors prefer implementing the bond allocation through individual Treasury securities rather than ETFs, eliminating management fees while gaining precise maturity control. Treasury auctions provide access to new securities without bid-ask spreads, though this approach requires more sophisticated portfolio management. Factor-based implementations replace broad market ETFs with factor-tilted alternatives. Value-tilted stock ETFs, quality-focused bond ETFs, or momentum-based commodity indices may enhance returns while maintaining the All Weather framework's diversification benefits. However, these modifications introduce additional complexity and potential tracking error. Conclusion: Embracing the Long Game The All Weather Strategy represents more than an investment approach; it embodies a philosophy of financial resilience that prioritizes sustainable wealth building over speculative gains. In an investment landscape increasingly dominated by algorithmic trading, meme stocks, and cryptocurrency volatility, Dalio's methodical approach offers a refreshing alternative grounded in economic theory and historical evidence. The strategy's greatest strength lies not in its potential for extraordinary returns, but in its capacity to deliver reasonable returns across diverse economic environments while protecting capital during market stress. This characteristic becomes increasingly valuable as investors approach or enter retirement, when portfolio preservation assumes greater importance than aggressive growth. Implementation requires discipline, adequate capital, and realistic expectations. The strategy will underperform growth-oriented approaches during bull markets while providing superior downside protection during bear markets. Investors must embrace this trade-off consciously, understanding that the strategy optimizes for long-term wealth building rather than short-term performance. The All Weather Strategy Indicator democratizes access to institutional-quality portfolio management, providing individual investors with tools previously available only to wealthy families and institutions. By automating allocation tracking, rebalancing signals, and performance analysis, the indicator removes much of the complexity that has historically limited sophisticated strategy implementation. For investors seeking a systematic, evidence-based approach to long-term wealth building, the All Weather Strategy provides a compelling framework. Its emphasis on diversification, risk management, and behavioral discipline aligns with the fundamental principles that have created lasting wealth throughout financial history. While the strategy may not generate headlines or inspire cocktail party conversations, it offers something more valuable: a reliable path toward financial security across all economic seasons. As Dalio himself notes, "The biggest mistake investors make is to believe that what happened in the recent past is likely to persist, and they design their portfolios accordingly." The All Weather Strategy's enduring appeal lies in its rejection of this recency bias, instead embracing the uncertainty of markets while positioning for success regardless of which economic season unfolds. STEP-BY-STEP INDICATOR SETUP GUIDE Setting up the All Weather Strategy Indicator requires careful attention to each configuration parameter to ensure optimal implementation. This comprehensive setup guide walks through every setting and explains its impact on strategy performance. Initial Setup Process Begin by adding the indicator to your TradingView chart. Search for "Ray Dalio's All Weather Strategy" in the indicator library and apply it to any chart. The indicator operates independently of the underlying chart symbol, drawing data directly from the five required ETFs regardless of which security appears on the chart. Portfolio Configuration Settings Start with the Portfolio Capital input, which drives all subsequent calculations. Enter your exact investable capital, ranging from $1,000 to $10,000,000. This input determines share quantities, trade recommendations, and performance calculations. Conservative recommendations suggest minimum capitals of $50,000 for basic implementation or $100,000 for optimal precision. Select your Portfolio Start Date carefully, as this establishes the baseline for all performance calculations. Choose the date when you actually began implementing the All Weather Strategy, not when you first learned about it. This date should reflect when you first purchased ETFs according to the target allocation, creating realistic performance tracking. Choose your Rebalancing Frequency based on your cost structure and precision preferences. Monthly rebalancing provides tighter allocation control but increases transaction costs. Quarterly rebalancing offers the optimal balance for most investors between allocation precision and cost control. The indicator automatically detects appropriate trading days regardless of your selection. Set the Rebalancing Threshold based on your tolerance for allocation drift and transaction costs. Conservative investors preferring tight control should use 1-2% thresholds, while cost-conscious investors may prefer 3-5% thresholds. Lower thresholds maintain more precise allocations but trigger more frequent trading. Display Configuration Options Enable Show All Weather Calculator to display the comprehensive dashboard containing portfolio values, allocations, and performance metrics. This dashboard provides essential information for portfolio management and should remain enabled for most users. Show Economic Environment displays current economic regime classification based on growth and inflation indicators. While simplified compared to Bridgewater's sophisticated models, this feature provides useful context for understanding current market conditions. Show Rebalancing Signals highlights when portfolio allocations drift beyond your threshold settings. These signals use color coding to indicate urgency levels, helping prioritize rebalancing activities. Advanced Label Customization Configure Show Rebalancing Labels based on your need for chart annotations. These labels mark important portfolio events and can provide valuable historical context, though they may clutter charts during extended time periods. Select appropriate Label Detail Levels based on your experience and information needs. "None" provides minimal symbols suitable for experienced users. "Basic" shows portfolio values at key events. "Detailed" provides complete trading instructions including exact share quantities for each ETF. Appearance Customization Choose Color Themes based on your aesthetic preferences and trading style. "Gold" reflects traditional wealth management appearance, while "EdgeTools" provides modern professional styling. "Behavioral" uses psychologically informed colors that reinforce disciplined decision-making. Enable Dark Mode Optimization if using TradingView's dark theme for optimal readability and contrast. This setting automatically adjusts all colors and transparency levels for the selected theme. Set Main Line Width based on your chart resolution and visual preferences. Higher width values provide clearer allocation lines but may overwhelm smaller charts. Most users prefer width settings of 2-3 for optimal visibility. Troubleshooting Common Setup Issues If the indicator displays "Data not available" messages, verify that all five ETFs (SPY, TLT, IEF, DJP, SCHP) have valid price data on your selected timeframe. The indicator requires daily data availability for all components. When rebalancing signals seem inconsistent, check your threshold settings and ensure sufficient time has passed since the last rebalancing event. The indicator only triggers signals on designated rebalancing days (first trading day of each period) when drift exceeds threshold levels. If labels appear at unexpected chart locations, verify that your chart displays percentage values rather than price values. The indicator forces percentage formatting and 0-40% scaling for optimal allocation visualization. COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY AND FURTHER READING PRIMARY SOURCES AND RAY DALIO WORKS Dalio, R. (2017). Principles: Life and work. New York: Simon & Schuster. Dalio, R. (2018). A template for understanding big debt crises. Bridgewater Associates. Dalio, R. (2021). Principles for dealing with the changing world order: Why nations succeed and fail. New York: Simon & Schuster. BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES RESEARCH PAPERS Jensen, G., Kertesz, A. & Prince, B. (2010). All Weather strategy: Bridgewater's approach to portfolio construction. Bridgewater Associates Research. Prince, B. (2011). An in-depth look at the investment logic behind the All Weather strategy. Bridgewater Associates Daily Observations. Bridgewater Associates. (2015). Risk parity in the context of larger portfolio construction. Institutional Research. ACADEMIC RESEARCH ON RISK PARITY AND PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION Ang, A. & Bekaert, G. (2002). International asset allocation with regime shifts. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(4), 1137-1187. Bodie, Z. & Rosansky, V. I. (1980). Risk and return in commodity futures. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(3), 27-39. Campbell, J. Y. & Viceira, L. M. (2001). Who should buy long-term bonds? American Economic Review, 91(1), 99-127. Clarke, R., De Silva, H. & Thorley, S. (2013). Risk parity, maximum diversification, and minimum variance: An analytic perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(3), 39-53. Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (2004). The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25-46. BEHAVIORAL FINANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Montier, J. (2007). Behavioural investing: A practitioner's guide to applying behavioural finance. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. Black, F. & Litterman, R. (1992). Global portfolio optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(5), 28-43. PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION AND ETF ANALYSIS Gastineau, G. L. (2010). The exchange-traded funds manual. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Poterba, J. M. & Shoven, J. B. (2002). Exchange-traded funds: A new investment option for taxable investors. American Economic Review, 92(2), 422-427. Israelsen, C. L. (2005). A refinement to the Sharpe ratio and information ratio. Journal of Asset Management, 5(6), 423-427. ECONOMIC CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSET CLASS RESEARCH Ilmanen, A. (2011). Expected returns: An investor's guide to harvesting market rewards. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Swensen, D. F. (2009). Pioneering portfolio management: An unconventional approach to institutional investment. Rev. ed. New York: Free Press. Siegel, J. J. (2014). Stocks for the long run: The definitive guide to financial market returns & long-term investment strategies. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. RISK MANAGEMENT AND ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House. Lowenstein, R. (2000). When genius failed: The rise and fall of Long-Term Capital Management. New York: Random House. Stein, D. M. & DeMuth, P. (2003). Systematic withdrawal from retirement portfolios: The impact of asset allocation decisions on portfolio longevity. AAII Journal, 25(7), 8-12. CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Asness, C. S., Frazzini, A. & Pedersen, L. H. (2012). Leverage aversion and risk parity. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(1), 47-59. Roncalli, T. (2013). Introduction to risk parity and budgeting. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Ibbotson Associates. (2023). Stocks, bonds, bills, and inflation 2023 yearbook. Chicago: Morningstar. PERIODICALS AND ONGOING RESEARCH Journal of Portfolio Management - Quarterly publication featuring cutting-edge research on portfolio construction and risk management Financial Analysts Journal - Bi-monthly publication of the CFA Institute with practical investment research Bridgewater Associates Daily Observations - Regular market commentary and research from the creators of the All Weather Strategy RECOMMENDED READING SEQUENCE For investors new to the All Weather Strategy, begin with Dalio's "Principles" for philosophical foundation, then proceed to the Bridgewater research papers for technical details. Supplement with Markowitz's original portfolio theory work and behavioral finance literature from Kahneman and Tversky. Intermediate students should focus on academic papers by Ang & Bekaert on regime shifts, Clarke et al. on risk parity methods, and Ilmanen's comprehensive analysis of expected returns across asset classes. Advanced practitioners will benefit from Roncalli's technical treatment of risk parity mathematics, Asness et al.'s academic critique of leverage aversion, and ongoing research in the Journal of Portfolio Management.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh EdgeTools
Options Strategy V2.0📈 Options Strategy V2.0 – Intraday Reversal-Resilient Momentum System Overview: This strategy is designed specifically for intraday SPY, TSLA, MSFT, etc. options trading (0DTE or 1DTE), using high-probability signals derived from a confluence of technical indicators: EMA crossovers, RSI thresholds, ATR-based risk control, and volume spikes. The strategy aims to capture strong directional moves while avoiding overtrading, thanks to a built-in cooldown logic and optional time/session filters. ⚙️ Core Concept The strategy executes trades only in the direction of the prevailing trend, determined by short- and long-term Exponential Moving Averages (EMA). Entry signals are generated when the Relative Strength Index (RSI) confirms momentum in the direction of the trend, and volume spikes suggest institutional activity. To increase adaptability and user control, it includes a highly customizable parameter set for both long and short entries independently. 📌 Key Features ✅ Trend-Following Logic Long entries are only allowed when EMA(short) > EMA(long) Short entries are only allowed when EMA(short) < EMA(long) ✅ RSI Confirmation Long: Requires RSI crossover above a configurable threshold Short: Requires RSI crossunder below a configurable threshold Optional rejection filters: Entry blocked above/below specific RSI extremes ✅ Volume Spike Filter Confirms institutional participation by comparing current volume to an average multiplied by a user-defined factor. ✅ ATR-Based Risk Management Both Stop Loss (SL) and Take Profit (TP) are dynamically calculated using ATR × a multiplier. TP/SL ratio is fully configurable. ✅ Cooldown Control After every trade, the system waits for a set number of bars before allowing new entries. This prevents overtrading and increases signal quality. Optionally, cooldown is ignored for reversal trades, ensuring the system can react immediately to a confirmed trend change. ✅ Candle Body Filter (Noise Control) Avoids trades on candles with too small bodies relative to wicks (often noise or indecision candles). ✅ VWAP Confirmation (Optional) Ensures price is trading above VWAP for long entries, or below for short entries. ✅ Time & Session Filters Trades only during regular market hours (09:30–16:00 EST). No-trade zone (e.g., 14:15–15:45 EST) to avoid low-liquidity traps or late-day whipsaws. ✅ End-of-Day Auto Close All open positions are force-closed at 15:55 EST, protecting against overnight risk (especially relevant for 0DTE options). 📊 Visual Aids EMA plots show trend direction VWAP line provides real-time mean-reversion context Stop Loss and Take Profit lines appear dynamically with each trade Alerts notify of entry signals and exit triggers 🔧 Customization Panel Nearly every element of the strategy can be tailored: EMA lengths (short and long, for both sides) RSI thresholds and length ATR length, SL multiplier, and TP/SL ratio Volume spike sensitivity Minimum EMA distance filter Candle body ratio filter Session restrictions Cooldown logic (duration + reversal exception) This makes the strategy extremely versatile, allowing both conservative and aggressive configurations depending on the trader’s profile and the market context. 📌 Example Use Case: SPY Options (0DTE or 1DTE) This system was designed and tested specifically for SPY and other intraday options trading, where: Delta is around 0.50 or higher Trades are short-lived (often 1–5 candles) You aim to trade 1–3 signals per day, filtering out weak entries 🚫 Important Notes It is not a scalping strategy; it relies on confirmed breakouts with trend support No pyramiding or re-entries without cooldown to preserve risk integrity Should be used with real-time alerts and manual broker execution 📈 Alerts Included 📈 Long Entry Signal 📉 Short Entry Signal ⚠️ Auto-closed all positions at 15:55 EST ✅ Proven Settings – Real Trades + Backtest Results The current version of the strategy includes the optimal settings I’ve arrived at through extensive backtesting, as well as 3 months of real trading with consistent profitability. These results reflect real-world execution under live market conditions using 0DTE SPY options, with disciplined trade management and risk control. 🧠 Final Thoughts Options Strategy V2.0 is a robust, highly tunable intraday strategy that blends momentum, trend-following, and volume confirmation. It is ideal for disciplined traders focused on SPY or other 0DTE/1DTE options, and it includes guardrails to reduce false signals and improve execution timing. Perfect for those who seek precision, flexibility, and risk-defined setups—not blind automation.
Strategi Pine Script®
oleh olaszvandor
TimezoneFormatIANAUTCLibrary "TimezoneFormatIANAUTC" Provides either the full IANA timezone identifier or the corresponding UTC offset for TradingView’s built-in variables and functions. tz(_tzname, _format)   Parameters:      _tzname (string) : "London", "New York", "Istanbul", "+1:00", "-03:00" etc.      _format (string) : "IANA" or "UTC"   Returns: "Europe/London", "America/New York", "UTC+1:00" Example Code import ARrowofTime/TimezoneFormatIANAUTC/1 as libtz sesTZInput = input.string(defval = "Singapore", title = "Timezone") example1 = libtz.tz("London", "IANA") // Return Europe/London example2 = libtz.tz("London", "UTC") // Return UTC+1:00 example3 = libtz.tz("UTC+5", "IANA") // Return UTC+5:00 example4 = libtz.tz("UTC+4:30", "UTC") // Return UTC+4:30 example5 = libtz.tz(sesTZInput, "IANA") // Return Asia/Singapore example6 = libtz.tz(sesTZInput, "UTC") // Return UTC+8:00 sesTime1 = time("","1300-1700", example1) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na sesTime2 = time("","1300-1700", example2) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na sesTime3 = time("","1300-1700", example3) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na sesTime4 = time("","1300-1700", example4) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na sesTime5 = time("","1300-1700", example5) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na sesTime6 = time("","1300-1700", example6) // returns the UNIX time of the current bar in session time or na Parameter Format Guide This section explains how to properly format the parameters for the tz(_tzname, _format) function. _tzname (string) must be either; A valid timezone name exactly as it appears in the chart’s lower-right corner (e.g. New York, London). A valid UTC offset in ±H:MM or ±HH:MM format. Hours: 0–14 (zero-padded or not, e.g. +1:30, +01:30, -0:00). Minutes: Must be 00, 15, 30, or 45 examples; "New York" → ✅ Valid chart label "London" → ✅ Valid chart label "Berlin" → ✅ Valid chart label "America/New York" → ❌ Invalid chart label. (Use "New York" instead) "+1:30" → ✅ Valid offset with single-digit hour "+01:30" → ✅ Valid offset with zero-padded hour "-05:00" → ✅ Valid negative offset "-0:00" → ✅ Valid zero offset "+1:1" → ❌ Invalid (minute must be 00, 15, 30, or 45) "+2:50" → ❌ Invalid (minute must be 00, 15, 30, or 45) "+15:00" → ❌ Invalid (hour must be 14 or below) _tztype (string) must be either; "IANA" → returns full IANA timezone identifier (e.g. "Europe/London"). When a time function call uses an IANA time zone identifier for its timezone argument, its calculations adjust automatically for historical and future changes to the specified region’s observed time, such as daylight saving time (DST) and updates to time zone boundaries, instead of using a fixed offset from UTC. "UTC" → returns UTC offset string (e.g. "UTC+01:00")
Perpustakaan Pine Script®
oleh ARrowofTime
Relative Measured Volatility (RMV)RMV • Volume-Sensitive Consolidation Indicator A lightweight Pine Script that highlights true low-volatility, low-volume bars in a single squeeze measure. What it does Calculates each bar’s raw High-Low range. Down-weights bars where volume is below its 30-day average, emphasizing genuine quiet periods. Normalizes the result over the prior 15 bars (excluding the current bar), scaling from 0 (tightest) to 100 (most volatile). Draws the series as a step plot, shades true “tight” bars below the user threshold, and marks sustained squeezes with a small arrow. Key inputs Lookback (bars): Number of bars to use for normalization (default 15). Tight Threshold: RMV value under which a bar is considered squeezed (default 15). Volume SMA Period: Period for the volume moving average benchmark (default 30). How it works Raw range: barRange = high - low Volume ratio: volRatio = min(volume / sma(volume,30), 1) Weighted range: vwRange = barRange * volRatio Rolling min/max (prior 15 bars): exclude today so a new low immediately registers a 0. Normalize: rmv = clamp(100 * (vwRange - min) / (max - min), 0, 100) Visualization & signals Step line for exact bar-by-bar values. Shaded background when RMV < threshold. Consecutive-bar filter ensures arrows only appear when tightness lasts at least two bars, cutting noise. Why use it Quickly spot consolidation zones that combine narrow price action with genuine dry volume—ideal for swing entries ahead of breakouts.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh byunjungwon
1
Opening Range Breakout🧭 Overview The Open Range Breakout (ORB) indicator is designed to capture and display the initial price range of the trading day (typically the first 15 minutes), and help traders identify breakout opportunities beyond this range. This is a popular strategy among intraday and momentum traders. 🔧 Features 📊 ORB High/Low Lines Plots horizontal lines for the session’s high and low 🟩 Breakout Zones Background highlights when price breaks above or below the range 🏷️ Breakout Labels Text labels marking breakout events 🧭 Session Control Customizable session input (default: 09:15–09:30 IST) 📍 ORB Line Labels Text labels anchored to the ORB high and low lines (aligned right) 🔔 Alerts Configurable alerts for breakout events ⚙️ Adjustable Settings Show/hide background, labels, session window, etc. ⏱️ Session Logic • The ORB range is calculated during a defined session window (default: 09:15–09:30). • During this window, the highest high and lowest low are recorded as ORB High and ORB Low. 📈 Breakout Detection • Breakout Above: Triggered when price crosses above the ORB High. • Breakout Below: Triggered when price crosses below the ORB Low. • Each breakout can trigger: • A background highlight (green/red) • A text label (“Breakout ↑” / “Breakout ↓”) • An optional alert 🔔 Alerts Two built-in alert conditions: 1. Breakout Above ORB High • Message: "🔼 Price broke above ORB High: {{close}}" 2. Breakout Below ORB Low • Message: "🔽 Price broke below ORB Low: {{close}}" You can create alerts in TradingView by selecting these from the Add Alert window. 📌 Best Use Cases • Intraday momentum trading • Breakout and scalping strategies • First 15-minute range traders (NSE, BSE markets)
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh vasireddiramu78
NY ORB + Fakeout Detector🗽 NY ORB + Fakeout Detector This indicator automatically plots the New York Opening Range (ORB) based on the first 15 minutes of the NY session (15:30–15:45 CEST / 13:30–13:45 UTC) and detects potential fakeouts (false breakouts). 🔍 Key Features: ✅ Plots ORB high and low based on the 15-minute NY open range ✅ Automatically detects fake breakouts (price wicks beyond the box but closes back inside) ✅ Visual markers:   🔺 "Fake ↑" if a fake breakout occurs above the range   🔻 "Fake ↓" if a fake breakout occurs below the range ✅ Gray background highlights the ORB session window ✅ Designed for scalping and short-term breakout strategies 🧠 Best For: Intraday traders looking for NY volatility setups Scalpers using ORB-based entries Traders seeking early-session fakeout traps to avoid false signals Those combining with EMA 12/21, volume, or other confluence tools
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh STEFANGAS
Time HighlightHow This Works: Time Conversion: The script converts the current time to HHMM format (e.g., 9:16 becomes 916) for easy comparison. Timeframe Detection: It checks the current chart's timeframe: For 1-minute charts: Exactly matches the target times For 5-minute charts: Checks if the target time falls within the 5-minute window For 15-minute charts: Checks if the target time falls within the 15-minute window Highlighting: When the condition is met, it highlights the candle with a semi-transparent yellow color. Note: The script will work on 1-minute, 5-minute, and 15-minute timeframes only The highlight appears on the candle that contains the specified time The transparency is set to 70% so you can still see the candle through the highlight You can adjust the transparency level by changing the transp parameter (0 = fully opaque, 100 = fully transparent). make a pine script which change the color of the candle in yellow color in 1,5,15 timeframe at the time of 9:16, 9:31, 9:46
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh sandeepjakhar333