Your gartley is Scott Carney's "Ideal Gartley" pattern. It is not traded the same way as Tradeempowered Gartley or Larry Pasavento's Gartley. You should define PRZ for your entry and look at the priceaction there. Your targets and stops are also not consistent with "Ideal Gartley" stops and targets. Carney doesn't use fibs to define targets.
Your bat pattern is neither Carney's bat (B should be 38,2- cannot touch 61,8%) nor it is Tradeempowered Bat (B should be 50- cannot touch 61,8%). And again, you are trading it the same way as above.
Cypher pattern is incorrect. It doesn't have maximums in B and C points. These points just mustn't have a close beyond 61,8 and 1,414 correspondently.
And D-point should exceed B. It is compulsory.
See what I mean? Some ratios are taken here from one trader. Entry technique is taken from another person and your targets are taken from the third one.
If you know that trading is about probabilities you should know that even slight interference into a strategy rules can lead to unpredictable results.
And also no word here about: How do you define XA leg? You just take whatever movement of the Market?
And yes about the saying of that Person on the chart. Totally disagree. Traders lose not because they take none-existent patterns but because they are not disciplined enough to continue trading the same pattern until new equity high appears. About luck. If you are lucky enough to guess the movement of the market 30 times out of 100 and you have a risk to reward ratio 1:5 you will generate tons of money. The ability to do it consistently is called a skill.
About those ratios you are using, or that you are saying are the correct one's, i can present you a full hand of traders with different ratios, same as elliott counters, all of them have different waves counts. I do not look for exact prices or fib levels, i use previous structure to define a zone and not an exact price or fib level. I only use advanced patters to get some sync, i do not believe in luck. I only use this "table" as support and not as granted. And to finish here, obviously i do not take whatever movement the market print to start drawing a pattern, but i think the best way to check that is to look into my profile and check some previous charts...
There's people calling me the best on harmonics here on tradingview, thing i do not believe, because i have a lot to learn, i do really appreciate you comment, it give's something to think, and it was the objective to post a chart like this, i was expecting some reaction like your's. Thanks ;) and have a nice trading week ahead.