The Thanksgiving bounce was real & technically healthy with a sharp V-reversal off ~$585
Both a pullback or breakout are technically reasonable

The most realistic path is a slow grind into $630-$633 early this week & after FOMC, the market chooses its path
A “bounce into FOMC & then fade” base case is completely supported by the charts,
but it’s not the only valid outcome

A breakout remains technically possible if $637 is reclaimed with volume
Wave 5 & Wave b often look similar until one key level is broken or held & right now, price is where both counts remain technically valid & that’s why I feel at a loss - it's ambiguous by nature, but there are precise levels that resolve the ambiguity
1. Price must break above the prior high at $637.01 with no exceptions
2. Wave 5 should show expanding candles, improving breadth & stronger volume on the
push through resistance bands
1. If price rejects at resistance, wave b is confirmed & wave 5 is invalidated
2. If price closes above $637, then wave 5 is confirmed, period
3. If price rejects $630-$637 & breaks below $612, then the wave b path is confirmed
The bounce up from wave a low looks much more like a wave b correction than a wave 5 start given the retracement depth (~78.6%) fits wave b perfectly, declining volume, stretched oscillators without trend confirmation & price pinned under major resistance
Structurally, the chart is sound & doesn't violate any hard Elliott rules
The wave c target around $572 is reasonable if the correction continues
- Buyers regained key MAs (20d & 50d), oscillators turned upward & price broke out of the panic low without resistance
- Last week’s action built a tight coil under a clear ceiling & this type of setup often resolves after a catalyst (FOMC)
- QQQ is at a true inflection point - not obviously topping, not clearly breaking out
Both a pullback or breakout are technically reasonable
- A pullback is possible given stretched momentum, thinning volume, clear resistance $631-$637, many components are strong, but not surging & other short-term exhaustion signals which makes a risk of fade technically credible
- A breakout is still possible because the trend structure is intact, buyers defended every dip for 2 weeks, short-term AVWAPs are rising under price (support) & no reversal signals so the market tends to drift upward into events
The most realistic path is a slow grind into $630-$633 early this week & after FOMC, the market chooses its path
- If buyers don’t have conviction, then a pullback toward $612 to $605
- If buyers get a catalyst, then a breakout above $637
A “bounce into FOMC & then fade” base case is completely supported by the charts,
but it’s not the only valid outcome
A breakout remains technically possible if $637 is reclaimed with volume
- QQQ’s Thanksgiving rally carried into last week’s consolidation & the index is now poised at resistance in a balanced, technically neutral state so it can push higher into the $630-$633 early in the week, but the real move (pullback or breakout) will be decided after FOMC
Wave 5 & Wave b often look similar until one key level is broken or held & right now, price is where both counts remain technically valid & that’s why I feel at a loss - it's ambiguous by nature, but there are precise levels that resolve the ambiguity
1. Price must break above the prior high at $637.01 with no exceptions
- Wave 5 must make a higher high relative to wave 3
2. Wave 5 should show expanding candles, improving breadth & stronger volume on the
push through resistance bands
- Right now the move out of wave a is corrective-looking & wave 5 often starts with corrective back-testing; however, it has the look of an a–b–c upward correction, not a start of a new leg higher & this is a yellow flag for the bull case
1. If price rejects at resistance, wave b is confirmed & wave 5 is invalidated
- Price often stops exactly at the 78.6-82% retrace, which is common for wave b peaks
- Price should fail below $632-$637, then break $600-$605 & possibly accelerate lower to $570
2. If price closes above $637, then wave 5 is confirmed, period
3. If price rejects $630-$637 & breaks below $612, then the wave b path is confirmed
- This is the most important support on the chart
- Break $612 & the bounce was corrective so wave c is next
The bounce up from wave a low looks much more like a wave b correction than a wave 5 start given the retracement depth (~78.6%) fits wave b perfectly, declining volume, stretched oscillators without trend confirmation & price pinned under major resistance
- Wave 5 usually doesn't start with weak volume & overlapping candles, but wave b rallies often do
- We don't confirm the wave b top until the market breaks support
Structurally, the chart is sound & doesn't violate any hard Elliott rules
- A wave b often retraces 61.8-78.6%, or sometimes 100% of wave a
- The current rally is sitting just below the 78.6-82% ($630-$632) & may even tag $637 if the market pushes into the event/catalyst
- Wave c unfolds in 5 clean subwaves, often in a move parallel to wave a & usually lands near the 61.8% retrace of the prior impulse
- A realistic target is $560-$575
The wave c target around $572 is reasonable if the correction continues
- 0.618 × wave a (~32 points)
- 1 × wave a (most common, ~52 points)
- 1.618 × wave a (during strong, sharp corrections, ~84 points)
- $572 is between the 0.618 & 1 projections for wave c
- Lands almost perfectly on the 50% retracement of the entire wave 3 advance
I am not a licensed professional & these posts are for informational purposes only, not financial advice.
Penafian
Maklumat dan penerbitan adalah tidak bertujuan, dan tidak membentuk, nasihat atau cadangan kewangan, pelaburan, dagangan atau jenis lain yang diberikan atau disahkan oleh TradingView. Baca lebih dalam Terma Penggunaan.
I am not a licensed professional & these posts are for informational purposes only, not financial advice.
Penafian
Maklumat dan penerbitan adalah tidak bertujuan, dan tidak membentuk, nasihat atau cadangan kewangan, pelaburan, dagangan atau jenis lain yang diberikan atau disahkan oleh TradingView. Baca lebih dalam Terma Penggunaan.
