Master of Markets
In 2008 the U.S. central bank purchased
2008 was named QE1 and would continue for the next 6 years before the FED paused and eventually began to tighten.
During times of QE, banks, companies, markets all perform great.
There is plenty of liquidity to operate, margin is cheap.
When the fed tightens, markets get volatile.
Margin becomes expensive.
Most companies will survive this volatility.
They just pass the cost on to the consumer.
This creates inflation. Sticky inflation. Fed has to tighten more to fight inflation.
At this point it’s all they can do. But they risk crashing the markets.
The fed controls just how much air is let out and how fast.
That’s why you saw Jay Powell start with easing, into light QT and now in September the amounts they will be selling are very likely to put more down pressure on the markets.
Just realize the FED can manage the market pressure, it’s the unexpected events during times of low liquidity and high volatility that concerns me.
See the effects of Net liquidity on VIX over the past 15 years.
Never reaching above 30 except during extreme events like the flash crash and china crash..
You can see we’re in a time of extreme volatility as clusters of volatility reaching over 30 4 times since Nov 2021.
What is Net liquidity?
Net liquidity is a formula I found on Fintwit that is supposed to predict the markets movements 2 weeks in advance.
I don’t know if I believe that, but I did some Covariance analysis and there are certainly times during QE with high bullish correlation and QT there is high bearish correlations.
To determine Net Liquidity you need to take
The total assets of the Federal Reserve Balance sheet at 8.8 Trillion.
Subtract The Treasury General Account at 617 Billion
Then Subtract the 2.1T Overnight Reverse Repo
You get 5.9 Trillion in Net Liquidity.
Changes in the level of Net Liquidity (step up or step down) are claimed to predict the S&P 500 direction 2 weeks in advance.
The claim is that of a 95% correlation since the transitory quantitive easing and reverse repo were implemented.
I was curious to see if the claims were true.
More on that tomorrow.
- $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities
- $200 billion in agency debt
- $300 billion in long-term Treasury securities
2008 was named QE1 and would continue for the next 6 years before the FED paused and eventually began to tighten.
During times of QE, banks, companies, markets all perform great.
There is plenty of liquidity to operate, margin is cheap.
When the fed tightens, markets get volatile.
Margin becomes expensive.
Most companies will survive this volatility.
They just pass the cost on to the consumer.
This creates inflation. Sticky inflation. Fed has to tighten more to fight inflation.
At this point it’s all they can do. But they risk crashing the markets.
The fed controls just how much air is let out and how fast.
That’s why you saw Jay Powell start with easing, into light QT and now in September the amounts they will be selling are very likely to put more down pressure on the markets.
Just realize the FED can manage the market pressure, it’s the unexpected events during times of low liquidity and high volatility that concerns me.
See the effects of Net liquidity on VIX over the past 15 years.
Never reaching above 30 except during extreme events like the flash crash and china crash..
You can see we’re in a time of extreme volatility as clusters of volatility reaching over 30 4 times since Nov 2021.
What is Net liquidity?
Net liquidity is a formula I found on Fintwit that is supposed to predict the markets movements 2 weeks in advance.
I don’t know if I believe that, but I did some Covariance analysis and there are certainly times during QE with high bullish correlation and QT there is high bearish correlations.
To determine Net Liquidity you need to take
The total assets of the Federal Reserve Balance sheet at 8.8 Trillion.
Subtract The Treasury General Account at 617 Billion
Then Subtract the 2.1T Overnight Reverse Repo
You get 5.9 Trillion in Net Liquidity.
Changes in the level of Net Liquidity (step up or step down) are claimed to predict the S&P 500 direction 2 weeks in advance.
The claim is that of a 95% correlation since the transitory quantitive easing and reverse repo were implemented.
I was curious to see if the claims were true.
More on that tomorrow.
Penerbitan berkaitan
Penafian
Maklumat dan penerbitan adalah tidak dimaksudkan untuk menjadi, dan tidak membentuk, nasihat untuk kewangan, pelaburan, perdagangan dan jenis-jenis lain atau cadangan yang dibekalkan atau disahkan oleh TradingView. Baca dengan lebih lanjut di Terma Penggunaan.