Historical Volatility EstimatorsHistorical volatility is a statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index over a given period. This indicator provides different historical volatility model estimators with percentile gradient coloring and volatility stats panel.
█ OVERVIEW There are multiple ways to estimate historical volatility. Other than the traditional close-to-close estimator. This indicator provides different range-based volatility estimators that take high low open into account for volatility calculation and volatility estimators that use other statistics measurements instead of standard deviation. The gradient coloring and stats panel provides an overview of how high or low the current volatility is compared to its historical values.
█ CONCEPTS We have mentioned the concepts of historical volatility in our previous indicators, Historical Volatility, Historical Volatility Rank, and Historical Volatility Percentile. You can check the definition of these scripts. The basic calculation is just the sample standard deviation of log return scaled with the square root of time. The main focus of this script is the difference between volatility models.
Close-to-Close HV Estimator: Close-to-Close is the traditional historical volatility calculation. It uses sample standard deviation. Note: the TradingView build in historical volatility value is a bit off because it uses population standard deviation instead of sample deviation. N – 1 should be used here to get rid of the sampling bias.
Pros:
• Close-to-Close HV estimators are the most commonly used estimators in finance. The calculation is straightforward and easy to understand. When people reference historical volatility, most of the time they are talking about the close to close estimator.
Cons:
• The Close-to-close estimator only calculates volatility based on the closing price. It does not take account into intraday volatility drift such as high, low. It also does not take account into the jump when open and close prices are not the same.
• Close-to-Close weights past volatility equally during the lookback period, while there are other ways to weight the historical data.
• Close-to-Close is calculated based on standard deviation so it is vulnerable to returns that are not normally distributed and have fat tails. Mean and Median absolute deviation makes the historical volatility more stable with extreme values.
Parkinson Hv Estimator:
• Parkinson was one of the first to come up with improvements to historical volatility calculation. • Parkinson suggests using the High and Low of each bar can represent volatility better as it takes into account intraday volatility. So Parkinson HV is also known as Parkinson High Low HV. • It is about 5.2 times more efficient than Close-to-Close estimator. But it does not take account into jumps and drift. Therefore, it underestimates volatility. Note: By Dividing the Parkinson Volatility by Close-to-Close volatility you can get a similar result to Variance Ratio Test. It is called the Parkinson number. It can be used to test if the market follows a random walk. (It is mentioned in Nassim Taleb's Dynamic Hedging book but it seems like he made a mistake and wrote the ratio wrongly.)
Garman-Klass Estimator:
• Garman Klass expanded on Parkinson’s Estimator. Instead of Parkinson’s estimator using high and low, Garman Klass’s method uses open, close, high, and low to find the minimum variance method.
• The estimator is about 7.4 more efficient than the traditional estimator. But like Parkinson HV, it ignores jumps and drifts. Therefore, it underestimates volatility.
Rogers-Satchell Estimator:
• Rogers and Satchell found some drawbacks in Garman-Klass’s estimator. The Garman-Klass assumes price as Brownian motion with zero drift.
• The Rogers Satchell Estimator calculates based on open, close, high, and low. And it can also handle drift in the financial series.
• Rogers-Satchell HV is more efficient than Garman-Klass HV when there’s drift in the data. However, it is a little bit less efficient when drift is zero. The estimator doesn’t handle jumps, therefore it still underestimates volatility.
Garman-Klass Yang-Zhang extension:
• Yang Zhang expanded Garman Klass HV so that it can handle jumps. However, unlike the Rogers-Satchell estimator, this estimator cannot handle drift. It is about 8 times more efficient than the traditional estimator.
• The Garman-Klass Yang-Zhang extension HV has the same value as Garman-Klass when there’s no gap in the data such as in cryptocurrencies.
Yang-Zhang Estimator:
• The Yang Zhang Estimator combines Garman-Klass and Rogers-Satchell Estimator so that it is based on Open, close, high, and low and it can also handle non-zero drift. It also expands the calculation so that the estimator can also handle overnight jumps in the data.
• This estimator is the most powerful estimator among the range-based estimators. It has the minimum variance error among them, and it is 14 times more efficient than the close-to-close estimator. When the overnight and daily volatility are correlated, it might underestimate volatility a little.
• 1.34 is the optimal value for alpha according to their paper. The alpha constant in the calculation can be adjusted in the settings. Note: There are already some volatility estimators coded on TradingView. Some of them are right, some of them are wrong. But for Yang Zhang Estimator I have not seen a correct version on TV.
EWMA Estimator:
• EWMA stands for Exponentially Weighted Moving Average. The Close-to-Close and all other estimators here are all equally weighted.
• EWMA weighs more recent volatility more and older volatility less. The benefit of this is that volatility is usually autocorrelated. The autocorrelation has close to exponential decay as you can see using an Autocorrelation Function indicator on absolute or squared returns. The autocorrelation causes volatility clustering which values the recent volatility more. Therefore, exponentially weighted volatility can suit the property of volatility well.
• RiskMetrics uses 0.94 for lambda which equals 30 lookback period. In this indicator Lambda is coded to adjust with the lookback. It's also easy for EWMA to forecast one period volatility ahead.
• However, EWMA volatility is not often used because there are better options to weight volatility such as ARCH and GARCH.
Adjusted Mean Absolute Deviation Estimator:
• This estimator does not use standard deviation to calculate volatility. It uses the distance log return is from its moving average as volatility.
• It’s a simple way to calculate volatility and it’s effective. The difference is the estimator does not have to square the log returns to get the volatility. The paper suggests this estimator has more predictive power.
• The mean absolute deviation here is adjusted to get rid of the bias. It scales the value so that it can be comparable to the other historical volatility estimators.
• In Nassim Taleb’s paper, he mentions people sometimes confuse MAD with standard deviation for volatility measurements. And he suggests people use mean absolute deviation instead of standard deviation when we talk about volatility.
Adjusted Median Absolute Deviation Estimator:
• This is another estimator that does not use standard deviation to measure volatility.
• Using the median gives a more robust estimator when there are extreme values in the returns. It works better in fat-tailed distribution.
• The median absolute deviation is adjusted by maximum likelihood estimation so that its value is scaled to be comparable to other volatility estimators.
█ FEATURES
• You can select the volatility estimator models in the Volatility Model input
• Historical Volatility is annualized. You can type in the numbers of trading days in a year in the Annual input based on the asset you are trading.
• Alpha is used to adjust the Yang Zhang volatility estimator value.
• Percentile Length is used to Adjust Percentile coloring lookbacks.
• The gradient coloring will be based on the percentile value (0- 100). The higher the percentile value, the warmer the color will be, which indicates high volatility. The lower the percentile value, the colder the color will be, which indicates low volatility.
• When percentile coloring is off, it won’t show the gradient color.
• You can also use invert color to make the high volatility a cold color and a low volatility high color. Volatility has some mean reversion properties. Therefore when volatility is very low, and color is close to aqua, you would expect it to expand soon. When volatility is very high, and close to red, you would it expect it to contract and cool down.
• When the background signal is on, it gives a signal when HVP is very low. Warning there might be a volatility expansion soon.
• You can choose the plot style, such as lines, columns, areas in the plotstyle input.
• When the show information panel is on, a small panel will display on the right.
• The information panel displays the historical volatility model name, the 50th percentile of HV, and HV percentile. 50 the percentile of HV also means the median of HV. You can compare the value with the current HV value to see how much it is above or below so that you can get an idea of how high or low HV is. HV Percentile value is from 0 to 100. It tells us the percentage of periods over the entire lookback that historical volatility traded below the current level. Higher HVP, higher HV compared to its historical data. The gradient color is also based on this value.
█ HOW TO USE If you haven’t used the hvp indicator, we suggest you use the HVP indicator first. This indicator is more like historical volatility with HVP coloring. So it displays HVP values in the color and panel, but it’s not range bound like the HVP and it displays HV values. The user can have a quick understanding of how high or low the current volatility is compared to its historical value based on the gradient color. They can also time the market better based on volatility mean reversion. High volatility means volatility contracts soon (Move about to End, Market will cooldown), low volatility means volatility expansion soon (Market About to Move).
█ FINAL THOUGHTS HV vs ATR The above volatility estimator concepts are a display of history in the quantitative finance realm of the research of historical volatility estimations. It's a timeline of range based from the Parkinson Volatility to Yang Zhang volatility. We hope these descriptions make more people know that even though ATR is the most popular volatility indicator in technical analysis, it's not the best estimator. Almost no one in quant finance uses ATR to measure volatility (otherwise these papers will be based on how to improve ATR measurements instead of HV). As you can see, there are much more advanced volatility estimators that also take account into open, close, high, and low. HV values are based on log returns with some calculation adjustment. It can also be scaled in terms of price just like ATR. And for profit-taking ranges, ATR is not based on probabilities. Historical volatility can be used in a probability distribution function to calculated the probability of the ranges such as the Expected Move indicator. Other Estimators There are also other more advanced historical volatility estimators. There are high frequency sampled HV that uses intraday data to calculate volatility. We will publish the high frequency volatility estimator in the future. There's also ARCH and GARCH models that takes volatility clustering into account. GARCH models require maximum likelihood estimation which needs a solver to find the best weights for each component. This is currently not possible on TV due to large computational power requirements. All the other indicators claims to be GARCH are all wrong.
Pengurusan portfolio
Single AHR DCA (HM) — AHR Pane (customized quantile)Customized note
The log-regression window LR length controls how long a long-term fair value path is estimated from historical data.
The AHR window AHR window length controls over which historical regime you measure whether the coin is “cheap / expensive”.
When you choose a log-regression window of length L (years) and an AHR window of length A (years), you can intuitively read the indicator as:
“Within the last A years of this regime, relative to the long-term trend estimated over the same A years, the current price is cheap / neutral / expensive.”
Guidelines:
In general, set the AHR window equal to or slightly longer than the LR window:
If the AHR window is much longer than LR, you mix different baselines (different LR regimes) into one distribution.
If the AHR window is much shorter than LR, quantiles mostly reflect a very local slice of history.
For BTC / ETH and other BTC-like assets, you can use relatively long horizons (e.g. LR ≈ 3–5 years, AHR window ≈ 3–8 years).
For major altcoins (BNB / SOL / XRP and similar high-beta assets), it is recommended to use equal or slightly shorter horizons, e.g. LR ≈ 2–3 years, AHR window ≈ 2–3 years.
1. Price series & windows
Working timeframe: daily (1D).
Let the daily close of the current symbol on day t be P_t .
Main length parameters:
HM window: L_HM = maLen (default 200 days)
Log-regression window: L_LR = lrLen (default 1095 days ≈ 3 years)
AHR window (regime window): W = windowLen (default 1095 days ≈ 3 years)
2. Harmonic moving average (HM)
On a window of length L_HM, define the harmonic mean:
HM_t = ^(-1)
Here eps = 1e-10 is used to avoid division by zero.
Intuition: HM is more sensitive to low prices – an extremely low price inside the window will drag HM down significantly.
3. Log-regression baseline (LR)
On a window of length L_LR, perform a linear regression on log price:
Over the last L_LR bars, build the series
x_k = log( max(P_k, eps) ), for k = t-L_LR+1 ... t, and fit
x_k ≈ a + b * k.
The fitted value at the current index t is
log_P_hat_t = a + b * t.
Exponentiate to get the log-regression baseline:
LR_t = exp( log_P_hat_t ).
Interpretation: LR_t is the long-term trend / fair value path of the current regime over the past L_LR days.
4. HM-based AHR (valuation ratio)
At each time t, build an HM-based AHR (valuation multiple):
AHR_t = ( P_t / HM_t ) * ( P_t / LR_t )
Interpretation:
P_t / HM_t : deviation of price from the mid-term HM (e.g. 200-day harmonic mean).
P_t / LR_t : deviation of price from the long-term log-regression trend.
Multiplying them means:
if price is above both HM and LR, “expensiveness” is amplified;
if price is below both, “cheapness” is amplified.
Typical reading:
AHR_t < 1 : price is below both mid-term mean and long-term trend → statistically cheaper.
AHR_t > 1 : price is above both mid-term mean and long-term trend → statistically more expensive.
5. Empirical quantile thresholds (Opp / Risk)
On each new day, whenever AHR_t is valid, add it into a rolling array:
A_t_window = { AHR_{t-W+1}, ..., AHR_t } (at most W = windowLen elements)
On this empirical distribution, define two quantiles:
Opportunity quantile: q_opp (default 15%)
Risk quantile: q_risk (default 65%)
Using standard percentile computation (order statistics + linear interpolation), we get:
Opp threshold:
theta_opp = Percentile( A_t_window, q_opp )
Risk threshold:
theta_risk = Percentile( A_t_window, q_risk )
We also compute the percentile rank of the current AHR inside the same history:
q_now = PercentileRank( A_t_window, AHR_t ) ∈
This yields three valuation zones:
Opportunity zone: AHR_t <= theta_opp
(corresponds to roughly the cheapest ~q_opp% of historical states in the last W days.)
Neutral zone: theta_opp < AHR_t < theta_risk
Risk zone: AHR_t >= theta_risk
(corresponds to roughly the most expensive ~(100 - q_risk)% of historical states in the last W days.)
All quantiles are purely empirical and symbol-specific: they are computed only from the current asset’s own history, without reusing BTC thresholds or assuming cross-asset similarity.
6. DCA simulation (lightweight, rolling window)
Given:
a daily budget B (input: budgetPerDay), and
a DCA simulation window H (input: dcaWindowLen, default 900 days ≈ 2.5 years),
The script applies the following rule on each new day t:
If thresholds are unavailable or AHR_t > theta_risk
→ classify as Risk zone → buy = 0
If AHR_t <= theta_opp
→ classify as Opportunity zone → buy = 2B (double size)
Otherwise (Neutral zone)
→ buy = B (normal DCA)
Daily invested cash:
C_t ∈ {0, B, 2B}
Daily bought quantity:
DeltaQ_t = C_t / P_t
The script keeps rolling sums over the last H days:
Cumulative position:
Q_H = sum_{k=t-H+1..t} DeltaQ_k
Cumulative invested cash:
C_H = sum_{k=t-H+1..t} C_k
Current portfolio value:
PortVal_t = Q_H * P_t
Cumulative P&L:
PnL_t = PortVal_t - C_H
Active days:
number of days in the last H with C_k > 0.
These results are only used to visualize how this AHR-quantile-driven DCA rule would have behaved over the recent regime, and do not constitute financial advice.
Mebane Faber GTAA 5In 2007, Mebane Faber published research that challenged the conventional wisdom of buy-and-hold investing. His paper, titled "A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation" and published in the Journal of Wealth Management, demonstrated that a simple timing mechanism could reduce portfolio volatility and drawdowns while maintaining competitive returns (Faber, 2007). This indicator implements his Global Tactical Asset Allocation strategy, known as GTAA5, following the original methodology.
The core insight of Faber's research stems from a century of market data. By analyzing asset class performance from 1901 onwards, Faber found that a ten-month simple moving average served as an effective trend filter across major asset classes. When an asset trades above its ten-month moving average, it tends to continue its upward trajectory; when it falls below, significant drawdowns often follow (Faber, 2007, pp. 12-16). This observation aligns with momentum research by Jegadeesh and Titman (1993), who documented that intermediate-term momentum persists across equity markets.
The GTAA5 strategy allocates capital equally across five diversified asset classes: domestic equities (SPY), international developed markets (EFA), aggregate bonds (AGG), commodities (DBC), and real estate investment trusts (VNQ). Each asset receives a twenty percent allocation when trading above its ten-month moving average. When an asset falls below this threshold, its allocation moves to short-term treasury bills (SHY), creating a dynamic cash position that scales with market risk (Cambria Investment Management, 2013).
The strategy's historical performance during market crises illustrates its function. During the 2008 financial crisis, traditional sixty-forty portfolios experienced drawdowns exceeding forty percent. The GTAA5 strategy limited losses to approximately twelve percent by reducing equity exposure as prices declined below their moving averages (Faber, 2013). This asymmetric return profile represents the strategy's primary characteristic.
This implementation uses monthly closing prices retrieved via request.security() to calculate the ten-month simple moving average. This distinction matters, as approximations using daily data (such as a 200-day moving average) can generate different signals during volatile periods. Monthly data ensures the indicator produces signals consistent with published academic research.
The indicator provides position monitoring, automatic rebalancing detection on either the first or last trading day of each month, and share calculations based on user-defined capital. A dashboard displays current trend status for each asset class, target versus actual weightings, and trade instructions for rebalancing. Performance metrics including annualized volatility and Sharpe ratio provide ongoing risk assessment.
Several limitations warrant acknowledgment. First, the strategy rebalances monthly, meaning it cannot respond to intra-month market crashes. Second, transaction costs and taxes from monthly rebalancing may reduce net returns for taxable accounts. Third, the ten-month lookback period, while historically robust, offers no guarantee of future effectiveness. As Ilmanen (2011) notes in "Expected Returns", all timing strategies face the risk of regime change, where historical relationships break down.
This indicator serves educational purposes and portfolio monitoring. It does not constitute financial advice.
References:
Cambria Investment Management (2013). Global Tactical Asset Allocation: An Introduction to the Approach. Research Report, Los Angeles.
Faber, M.T. (2007). A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation. Journal of Wealth Management, Spring 2007, pp. 9-79.
Faber, M.T. (2013). Global Asset Allocation: A Survey of the World's Top Asset Allocation Strategies. Cambria Investment Management, Los Angeles.
Ilmanen, A. (2011). Expected Returns: An Investor's Guide to Harvesting Market Rewards. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), pp. 65-91.
ZY Target TerminatorThe indicator generates trading signals. The profitability displayed on the signal at the time it is generated is the maximum profitability of the trade opened with the preceding signal. Therefore, avoid trading pairs and trends where this ratio is insufficient.
Position Sizing Calculator (Real-Time) - Futures Edition█ SUMMARY
The following indicator is a Position Sizing Calculator based on Average True Range (ATR), originally developed by market technician J. Welles Wilder Jr., intended for real-time trading.
This script utilizes the user's account size, acceptable risk percentage, and a stop-loss distance based on ATR to dynamically calculate the appropriate position size for each trade in real time.
█ BACKGROUND
Developed for use on the Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures (MNQ), this script provides traders with continuously updated dynamic position sizes. It enables traders to instantly determine the exact number of contracts to use when entering a trade while staying within their acceptable risk tolerance.
This real-time position sizing tool helps traders make well-informed decisions when planning trade entries and calculating maximum stop-loss levels, ultimately enhancing risk management.
█ USER INPUTS
Trading Account Size: Total dollar value of the user's trading account.
Acceptable Risk (%): Maximum percentage of the trading account that the user is willing to risk per trade.
ATR Multiplier for Stop-Loss: Multiplier used to determine the distance of the stop-loss from the current price, based on the ATR value.
ATR Length: The length of the lookback period used to calculate the ATR value.
Show Target Risk Row: Toggle to hide/show the Target Risk Row
SL Levels Display: Option to see Both, Long Only, Short Only, or None of the Stop Loss Level Values.
Contract Point Value ($): Point value per contract. Tooltip highlights common values.
Tick Size: Minimum Price Movement (Default set to 0.25)
Minimum Contracts: Override the Minimum Contracts per trade to a user selected value.
(May Exceed User's Target Risk)
2-Year Real RateThe 2-year real rate is the inflation-adjusted yield on a 2-year U.S. Treasury—essentially the market’s expectation for short-term “true” interest rates after subtracting expected inflation (often approximated as nominal 2Y yield – breakeven inflation).
It matters because it reflects the actual cost of capital and is one of the cleanest gauges of the Fed’s effective stance: rising real rates mean tightening financial conditions, falling real rates mean loosening. In trading, the 2Y real rate is a powerful macro risk-on/risk-off indicator—equities, long-duration tech, crypto, and EM FX generally weaken when real rates rise, while USD and front-end rate-sensitive trades tend to strengthen. Watching inflections in the 2Y real rate helps you time shifts in liquidity, gauge how aggressively the market is pricing Fed moves, and position for cross-asset trends driven by changes in real funding conditions.
ATR Risk Manager v5.2 [Auto-Extrapolate]If you ever had problems knowing how much contracts to use for a particular timeframe to keep your risk within acceptable levels, then this indicator should help. You just have to define your accepted risk based on ATR and also percetage of your drawdown, then the indicator will tell you how many contracts you should use. If the risk is too high, it will also tell you not to trade. This is only for futures NQ MNQ ES MES GC MGC CL MCL MYM and M2K.
Multi-Ticker Anchored CandlesMulti-Ticker Anchored Candles (MTAC) is a simple tool for overlaying up to 3 tickers onto the same chart. This is achieved by interpreting each symbol's OHLC data as percentages, then plotting their candle points relative to the main chart's open. This allows for a simple comparison of tickers to track performance or locate relationships between them.
> Background
The concept of multi-ticker analysis is not new, this type of analysis can be extremely helpful to get a gauge of the over all market, and it's sentiment. By analyzing more than one ticker at a time, relationships can often be observed between tickers as time progresses.
While seeing multiple charts on top of each other sounds like a good idea...each ticker has its own price scale, with some being only cents while others are thousands of dollars.
Directly overlaying these charts is not possible without modification to their sources.
By using a fixed point in time (Period Open) and percentage performance relative to that point for each ticker, we are able to directly overlay symbols regardless of their price scale differences.
The entire process used to make this indicator can be summed up into 2 keywords, "Scaling & Anchoring".
> Scaling
First, we start by determining a frame of reference for our analysis. The indicator uses timeframe inputs to determine sessions which are used, by default this is set to 1 day.
With this in place, we then determine our point of reference for scaling. While this could be any point in time, the most sensible for our application is the daily (or session) open.
Each symbol shares time, therefore, we can take a price point from a specified time (Opening Price) and use it to sync our analysis over each period.
Over the day, we track the percentage performance of each ticker's OHLC values relative to its daily open (% change from open).
Since each ticker's data is now tracked based on its opening price, all data is now using the same scale.
The scale is simply "% change from open".
> Anchoring
Now that we have our scaled data, we need to put it onto the chart.
Since each point of data is relative to it's daily open (anchor point), relatively speaking, all daily opens are now equal to each other.
By adding the scaled ticker data to the main chart's daily open, each of our resulting series will be properly scaled to the main chart's data based on percentages.
Congratulations, We have now accurately scaled multiple tickers onto one chart.
> Display
The indicator shows each requested ticker as different colored candlesticks plotted on top of the main chart.
Each ticker has an associated label in front of the current bar, each component of this label can be toggled on or off to allow only the desired information to be displayed.
To retain relevance, at the start of each session, a "Session Break" line is drawn, as well as the opening price for the session. These can also be toggled.
Note: The opening price is the opening price for ALL tickers, when a ticker crosses the open on the main chart, it is crossing its own opening price as well.
> Examples
In the chart below, we can see NYSE:MCD NASDAQ:WEN and NASDAQ:JACK overlaid on a NASDAQ:SBUX chart.
From this, we can see NASDAQ:JACK was the top gainer on the day. While this was the case, it also fell roughly 4% from its peak near lunchtime. Unlike the top gainer, we can see the other 3 tickers ended their day near their daily high.
In the explanations above, the daily timeframe is used since it is the default; however, the analysis is not constrained to only days. The anchoring period can be set to any timeframe period.
In the chart below, you can observe the Daily, Weekly, and Monthly anchored charts side-by-side.
This can be used on all tickers, timeframes, and markets. While a typical application may be comparing relevant assets... the script is not limited.
Below we have a chart tracking COMEX:GCV2026 , FX:EURUSD , and COINBASE:DOGEUSD on the AMEX:SPY chart.
While these tickers are not typically compared side-by-side, here it is simply a display of the capabilities of the script.
Enjoy!
Relative Performance Analyzer [AstrideUnicorn]Relative Performance Analyzer (RPA) is a performance analysis tool inspired by the data comparison features found in professional trading terminals. The RPA replicates the analytical approach used by portfolio managers and institutional analysts who routinely compare multiple securities or other types of data to identify relative strength opportunities, make allocation decisions, choose the most optimal investment from several alternatives, and much more.
Key Features:
Multi-Symbol Comparison: Track up to 5 different symbols simultaneously across any asset class or dataset
Two Performance Calculation Methods: Choose between percentage returns or risk-adjusted returns
Interactive Analysis: Drag the start date line on the chart or manually choose the start date in the settings
Professional Visualization: High-contrast color scheme designed for both dark and light chart themes
Live Performance Table: Real-time display of current return values sorted from the top to the worst performers
Practical Use Cases:
ETF Selection: Compare similar ETFs (e.g., SPY vs IVV vs VOO) to identify the most efficient investment
Sector Rotation: Analyze which sectors are showing relative strength for strategic allocation
Competitive Analysis: Compare companies within the same industry to identify leaders (e.g., APPLE vs SAMSUNG vs XIAOMI)
Cross-Asset Allocation: Evaluate performance across stocks, bonds, commodities, and currencies to guide portfolio rebalancing
Risk-Adjusted Decisions: Use risk-adjusted performance to find investments with the best returns per unit of risk
Example Scenarios:
Analyze whether tech stocks are outperforming the broader market by comparing XLK to SPY
Evaluate which emerging market ETF (EEM vs VWO) has provided better risk-adjusted returns over the past year
HOW DOES IT WORK
The indicator calculates and visualizes performance from a user-defined starting point using two methodologies:
Percentage Returns: Standard total return calculation showing percentage change from the start date
Risk-Adjusted Returns: Cumulative returns divided by the volatility (standard deviation), providing insight into the efficiency of performance. An expanding window is used to calculate the volatility, ensuring accurate risk-adjusted comparisons throughout the analysis period.
HOW TO USE
Setup Your Comparison: Enable up to 5 assets and input their symbols in the settings
Set Analysis Period: When you first launch the indicator, select the start date by clicking on the price chart. The vertical start date line will appear. Drag it on the chart or manually input a specific date to change the start date.
Choose Return Type: Select between percentage or risk-adjusted returns based on your analysis needs
Interpret Results
Use the real-time table for precise current values
SETTINGS
Assets 1-5: Toggle on/off and input symbols for comparison (stocks, ETFs, indices, forex, crypto, fundamental data, etc.)
Start Date: Set the initial point for return calculations (drag on chart or input manually)
Return Type: Choose between "Percentage" or "Risk-Adjusted" performance.
Technology Stocks RSPSTechnology Stocks RSPS Indicator - TradingView Description
Overview
The Technology Stocks RSPS (Relative Strength Portfolio System) indicator is a sophisticated portfolio allocation tool designed specifically for technology sector stocks. It calculates relative strength positions and provides dynamic allocation recommendations based on technical price momentum analysis.
Key Features
- Relative Strength Analysis: Compares 15 major technology stocks and the XLK sector ETF
against each other and gold as a baseline
- Dynamic Portfolio Allocation: Automatically calculates optimal position sizes based on relative
performance
- Visual Portfolio Performance: Tracks cumulative portfolio returns with color-coded
performance indicators
- Customizable Table Display: Shows real-time allocation percentages and optional cash values
for each position
- Technical Momentum Filtering: Uses normalized indicators to identify strength and filter out
weak positions
Included Assets
Sector ETF: XLK
Major Tech Stocks: AAPL, MSFT, NVDA, AVGO, CRM, ORCL, CSCO, ADBE, ACN, AMD, IBM, INTC, NOW, TXN
Benchmark: Gold (TVC:GOLD)
How It Works
The indicator calculates a relative strength score for each asset by comparing it against:
Gold (baseline commodity)
All other technology stocks in the pool
The XLK sector ETF
Assets with positive relative strength receive portfolio allocations proportional to their strength scores. Weak or negative performers are automatically filtered out (allocated 0%).
Visual Elements
Red Area: Aggregate strength of major technology stocks
Navy Blue Area: Overall technical positioning index (TPI)
Performance Line: Cumulative portfolio return (blue = cash-heavy, red = equity-heavy)
Allocation Table: Bottom-left display showing current recommended positions
Important Limitations
This indicator primarily uses technical data and has significant limitations:
❌ No fundamental economic data (ISM, CLI, etc.)
❌ Limited monetary data - missing critical components:
comprehensive monetary data
Funding rates
Detailed bond spreads analysis
Collateral data
❌ No sentiment indicators
❌ No options flow or derivatives data
❌ No earnings or valuation metrics
The indicator focuses purely on price-based relative strength and technical momentum. Users should combine this tool with fundamental analysis, economic data, and proper risk management for complete investment decisions.
Settings
Plot Table: Toggle allocation table visibility
Use Cash: Enable to display dollar amounts based on portfolio size
Cash Amount: Set your total portfolio value for cash allocation calculations
Use Cases
Sector rotation within technology stocks
Relative strength-based portfolio rebalancing
Technical momentum screening for tech sector
Dynamic position sizing based on price trends
Technical Notes
The script avoids for-loops to reduce calculation errors and noise
Uses semi-individual calculations for each asset
Requires the Unicorpus/NormalizedIndicators/1 library for normalized momentum calculations
Maximum lookback: 100 bars
Disclaimer: This indicator is a technical tool only and should not be used as the sole basis for investment decisions. It does not incorporate fundamental, economic, or comprehensive monetary data. Always conduct thorough research and consider your risk tolerance before making investment decisions.
2s10s Bull/Bear Steepener/Flattener (Intraday bars)A simple indicator that tracks the curve of the US2y and US10y
Marcaj Ore 07:00 și 18:00 (Stabil v2)For backtesting and remember times that you can be active in the market.
Position Sizer (FinPip)Position Sizer (FinPip)
The Position Sizer (FinPip) indicator is a crucial, all-in-one risk management tool designed to calculate the precise trade size required to limit your risk to a predetermined percentage of your total account capital.
This indicator helps you consistently execute sound risk management, regardless of the instrument's volatility or the trade's price levels.
Key Features:
Calculates Position Size: Based on your configurable Account Capital, desired Risk Percentage (default 2.5%), and the price distance between your Entry and Stop-Loss levels.
Visual Trade Planning: Plots three clear levels directly on the chart for easy visualization:
Entry Price (Blue)
Stop-Loss Price (SL) (Red)
Profit Target (Lime Green, calculated using the Reward:Risk Ratio).
Custom Risk Management: Easily adjust the Risk Percentage and the Reward:Risk Ratio (default 4.0) in the indicator's settings.
Heads-Up Display (HUD): A clean, fixed table in the bottom-left corner of the chart clearly displays all calculated metrics, including your Required Position Size (in units/shares/contracts), Risk Amount, and Potential Profit.
How to Use:
Enter your Account Capital and desired Risk % in the settings panel.
Set your desired Entry Price and Stop-Loss Price.
The indicator immediately calculates and displays the exact number of units you need to trade to maintain your risk limit.
The Position Sizer (FinPip)The Position Sizer (FinPip) indicator is a crucial, all-in-one risk management tool designed to calculate the precise trade size required to limit your risk to a predetermined percentage of your total account capital.
This indicator helps you consistently execute sound risk management, regardless of the instrument's volatility or the trade's price levels.
Key Features:
Calculates Position Size: Based on your configurable Account Capital, desired Risk Percentage (default 2.5%), and the price distance between your Entry and Stop-Loss levels.
Visual Trade Planning: Plots three clear levels directly on the chart for easy visualization:
Entry Price (Blue)
Stop-Loss Price (SL) (Red)
Profit Target (Lime Green, calculated using the Reward:Risk Ratio).
Custom Risk Management: Easily adjust the Risk Percentage and the Reward:Risk Ratio (default 4.0) in the indicator's settings.
Heads-Up Display (HUD): A clean, fixed table in the bottom-left corner of the chart clearly displays all calculated metrics, including your Required Position Size (in units/shares/contracts), Risk Amount, and Potential Profit.
How to Use:
Enter your Account Capital and desired Risk % in the settings panel.
Set your desired Entry Price and Stop-Loss Price.
The indicator immediately calculates and displays the exact number of units you need to trade to maintain your risk limit.
Position Sizer (FinPip)The Position Sizer (FinPip) indicator is a crucial, all-in-one risk management tool designed to calculate the precise trade size required to limit your risk to a predetermined percentage of your total account capital.
This indicator helps you consistently execute sound risk management, regardless of the instrument's volatility or the trade's price levels.
Key Features:
Calculates Position Size: Based on your configurable Account Capital, desired Risk Percentage (default 2.5%), and the price distance between your Entry and Stop-Loss levels.
Visual Trade Planning: Plots three clear levels directly on the chart for easy visualization:
Entry Price (Blue)
Stop-Loss Price (SL) (Red)
Profit Target (Lime Green, calculated using the Reward:Risk Ratio).
Custom Risk Management: Easily adjust the Risk Percentage and the Reward:Risk Ratio (default 4.0) in the indicator's settings.
Heads-Up Display (HUD): A clean, fixed table in the bottom-left corner of the chart clearly displays all calculated metrics, including your Required Position Size (in units/shares/contracts), Risk Amount, and Potential Profit.
How to Use:
Enter your Account Capital and desired Risk % in the settings panel.
Set your desired Entry Price and Stop-Loss Price.
The indicator immediately calculates and displays the exact number of units you need to trade to maintain your risk limit.
Kill Zone GridCaca Poo-Poo Kill Zone (12pm–4pm) — Avoid the Death Hours
This indicator highlights the worst trading window of the day — the midday chop zone where liquidity dies, algo volume disappears, spreads widen, and your account slowly bleeds out from boredom and paper cuts.
From 12pm to 4pm (New York Time) the script:
• Shades the background with a bold kill-zone color
• Adds red gridline stripes to visually scream “STOP TRADING, YOU DONKEY”
• Makes the entire chart look hostile so you avoid revenge trading, boredom trading, and all forms of midday stupidity
Perfect for scalpers and trend traders who only want the clean morning moves and want a visual reminder to step away, go outside, touch grass, eat lunch, or hit the gym instead of forcing trades in garbage hours.
If you trade futures, options, or zero-day anything — this script will save you money, sanity, and years off your life.
Mini Checklist (Left-side, static)It's a mini checklist on the left side of the chart serving as a note for when you trade.
Pretty simple
calculator contracts MNQ PIPEGAVTRADESThis is a Risk Management indicator that calculates the exact contracts to trade based on your defined Max Risk ($) and Stop Loss Ticks.
It displays all key Position Sizing metrics (including Account Capital and Risk %) in a fixed table on the chart.
Price Drop CounterThe Price Drop Counter is a very basic statistical indicator.
See it as an analytical tool that tracks how many times an asset's price has dropped by a specified percentage from its recent peak within a defined date range.
The indicator monitors the highest price reached and counts each occurrence when the price falls by your chosen threshold, then resets its peak tracking point after each drop is registered.
Uses
Volatility Assessment: Measure how frequently significant price corrections occur during specific periods
Market Behavior Analysis: Compare drop frequency across different timeframes or market conditions
Risk Evaluation: Identify assets or periods with higher downside volatility
Historical Pattern Recognition: Study how often major pullbacks happened during bull or bear markets
Backtesting Support: Analyze how your strategy would perform based on the frequency of drawdowns
How to use it
Add the indicator to your TradingView chart
Configure the Percent Drop (%) to define your threshold (default: 10%). The indicator will count each time price falls by this percentage from the most recent high
IMPORTANT Set your Start Date and End Date to analyze a specific period of interest
The blue step-line plot shows the cumulative count of drops within your date range
Adjust the percentage threshold based on your analysis needs - use smaller values (2-5%) for more frequent signals or larger values (15-20%) for major corrections only
The counter resets its high-water mark after each qualifying drop, allowing it to track multiple sequential drops within the same period.
Rendement périodes (finary compass)Rendement sur une période donnée,
Outil de décision pour stratégie Momentum
Net Liquidity (WALCL - TGA - ON RRP)//@version=5
indicator("Net Liquidity (WALCL - TGA - ON RRP)", overlay=false, timeframe="W")
a = request.security("FRED:WALCL", "W", close) // Fed total assets (millions)
b = request.security("FRED:WTREGEN", "W", close) // TGA (millions)
c = request.security("FRED:RRPONTSYD","W", close) // ON RRP (millions)
netliq = (a - b - c) / 1000.0 // billions
plot(netliq, color=color.new(color.blue, 0), linewidth=2)
ATR Risk Display - Multi FuturesWhat This Does
I got tired of manually calculating my ATR stops and risk for different futures contracts, especially when switching between ES, NQ, and their micro versions. This indicator automatically detects what futures symbol you're trading and shows you the exact tick count and dollar risk for your stop loss.
The Problem It Solves
If you trade futures with ATR-based stops, you know the hassle:
Different contracts have different tick values
You need to calculate position risk in dollars
Switching between symbols means redoing all the math
Renko charts make it even more confusing since ATR needs to come from regular candles
This handles all of that automatically.
Key Features
Auto-detects futures symbols - ES, NQ, YM, RTY, GC, CL, and all the micros (MES, MNQ, etc.)
Shows everything you need in one line: ATR(timeframe) × multiplier = X ticks ($XXX)
Works on Renko charts - pulls ATR from regular timeframe charts (super important if you use Renko)
Adjustable position sizing - set your contract count and see total risk instantly
Clean, minimal display - just the info you need, no clutter
How to Use
Add it to any futures chart
Set your preferred ATR timeframe (I use 5-minute)
Set your ATR multiplier (I use 1.5x for my stops)
Set your contract size
That's it - the indicator handles the rest
The display will show something like: "ES ATR(5) × 1.5 = 12 ticks ($150)"
Settings Explained
ATR Timeframe: What timeframe to calculate ATR from (always uses regular candles, even on Renko)
ATR Multiplier: How many ATRs for your stop (1.5 is common, 2.0 for wider stops)
Number of Contracts: Your position size for risk calculation
Auto-Detect Symbol: Leave on unless you want to manually override
Supported Futures
Full size: ES, NQ, YM, RTY, GC, CL, ZB, ZN, 6E, 6J
Micros: MES, MNQ, MYM, M2K, MGC, MCL
Notes
Made this primarily for my own ES trading but figured others might find it useful
The tick values are based on standard CME specs
If you trade other futures, you can modify the code to add them
Works great alongside level indicators for risk management
Why This Exists
I use ATR trailing stops on all my trades and got tired of doing mental math every time I switched between charts or contracts. Especially useful if you trade both full-size and micro contracts - the risk difference is huge and easy to mess up.
Hope this helps your trading! Feel free to suggest improvements.
BEMFUNDING MAX LOT CALCULATION (Sakince)You can use this indicator to ensure you don't exceed the "Maximum Lot" limit. Because the required data varies from pair to pair, you should obtain the latest information from the BEM Funding platform.
