Pendidikan

Harmonic Patterns Ratios 2016 // ®

FX:EURUSD   Fx Euro/Dolar U.S.
Dilihat 21552 kali
21552
Check other #Educational charts:

Komen: The Cypher Video https://youtu.be/riuWLUQS5ds
Komen: The Crab Video https://youtu.be/VG88uSprLX4
Komen: The Butterfly Video https://youtu.be/aZnkAmvcSMo
Komen: The Gartley Video - https://youtu.be/1BUjPdWHAHE

Idea Berkaitan

mengenai DXY 25
Just found this. Such a great conglomeration of information, thank you so much!
Balas
1 Question, you have 2 images with different ratios (at least) on Bat C leg. The second says "38.2 - 88.6 AB" but the first says "at least 61.8 (must close below 88.6)". So what is an acceptable C leg? 61.8 and above ( to 88.6), anything from 38.2 to 88.6 or just the perfect ratios 38.2, 61.8, 88.6? Thank You for your time, and for the pictures!
Balas
that an excellent cheat sheet
Balas
Thanks for sharing. A lot of valuable information from which we can all learn from.
Balas
thanks a million! this is the cheat-sheet i was looking for!
Balas
DanielAnthony
;)
Balas
shark pattern table has alot of flaws (i would say its just incorrect), but the rest seems correct. good work
Balas
SergeantPringles
- This is your most recent Shark pattern forecast, can you please update me? Please correct me if i'm wrong, i'm trading them a few years so far, so... post a chart with your ratios...
Balas
Andre_Cardoso
?
Balas
Andre_Cardoso
yup those are good and valid shark patterns. but the table is still wrong tho. first up - sharkpatterns are labeld differently than all the other pattern because the are part of the earlier found 5-0 pattern. thats why sharks start with 0 and the X point is where normaly A is(and so on from there - with completion at C) so abit false labeled in your table. in the table you also say B(which with the corrected labeling should be A) is 618, which isnt norm. and clearly (from your charts) you are workin with smaller retracments too. technically A doesnt need to have desired retracment level, but its hard to make the pattern work ratiowise if its much less than a 382. A(your B) is defined by the correction projection of B and C, so no retracment level required. and the 618 is certainly wrong. lastly your C point (normally B) doesnt need at least be a 1.13 XA(normmal 0X) but instead a 1.13 AB(normally XA - ironicly). its abit confusing to explain due to the false labeling. here a random chart i put together to showcase the correct labeling and to correct ratios. those ratios are based on the publications of the guy who found and named the pattern in the early 2000s - Scott Carney
Balas