linear grow in log scale doesnt fit the direction ...

... we are pointing at

If we stay at the current grow rate we get to 100k$ at 2030:

this linked image shows it in normal scale.

this published idea here shows this linear grow to 100k$ in log scale (blue)

--> meaning our current grow rate is still low, because we would make a sharp break in log scale when we follow the linear blue path

(hope i could explain my idea so that it can be understood)

Komen:

isnt it great to watch back at your old ideas and see that they fit :D

Komen:

Still fit :D