Mulakan

Cari dalam skrip untuk "mtf"

MTF Damiani Volatmeter v3.2Damiani_volatmeter.mq4 v3.2 | Copyright © 2006,2007 Luis Guilherme Damiani | It is a transplant of an indicator to judge the range market price. The original is judged by the two curves, but this indicator shows the difference between the two curves. If it is 0 or less, it can be judged as a range. The red and green lines show the strength of this hourly trend, and if the range is below zero, the background is painted red. The blue and orange lines indicate the strength of the trend of the upper leg, and if the market price is below zero, the background is painted blue. I think that the background color will be purple if the market price is both strong and below zero. レンジ相場を判定するインジケーターを移植したものです。 本来のものは２本の曲線で判断するのですが、このインジケーターでは２本の曲線の差を表示しています。 0以下ならレンジと判定できます。 赤と緑の線はこの時間足のトレンドの強さを示し、ゼロ以下のレンジ相場なら、背景を赤く塗っています。 青とオレンジ色の線は上位足のトレンドの強さを示し、ゼロ以下のレンジ相場なら、背景を青く塗っています。 両方ゼロ以下の強いレンジ相場なら背景色が紫色のなると思います。
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh xinolia
4
MTF CMO (Chande Momentum Oscillator)Simple Multi-Timeframe version of the Chande Momentum Oscillator . Many thanks to HPotter whos script I used as a starting point. This displays 1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 period CMOs on the graph. 1, 2, 3, and 4 periods are smoothed by using their simple moving averages. 24 period is unsmoothed. I prefer to set my chart to a 1 hour timeframe and look for bottoming or topping patterns in the momentum. Strongest topping or bottoming patterns are when all timeframes roll over including the 24 period.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh KryptoSpartan
MTF Previous Open/Close/RangeThis indicator will simply plot on your chart the Daily/Weekly/Monthly previous candle levels. The "Auto" mode will allow automatic adjustment of timeframe displayed according to your chart. Otherwise you can select manually. Indicator plots the open/close and colors the high-low range area in the background. Hope this simple indicator will help you ! You can check my indicators via my TradingView's Profile : @PRO_Indicators
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh PRO_Indicators
6
FVG Premium [no1x]█ OVERVIEW This indicator provides a comprehensive toolkit for identifying, visualizing, and tracking Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) across three distinct timeframes (current chart, a user-defined Medium Timeframe - MTF, and a user-defined High Timeframe - HTF). It is designed to offer traders enhanced insight into FVG dynamics through detailed state monitoring (formation, partial fill, full mitigation, midline touch), extensive visual customization for FVG representation, and a rich alert system for timely notifications on FVG-related events. █ CONCEPTS This indicator is built upon the core concept of Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) and their significance in price action analysis, offering a multi-layered approach to their detection and interpretation across different timeframes. Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) A Fair Value Gap (FVG), also known as an imbalance, represents a range in price delivery where one side of the market (buying or selling) was more aggressive, leaving an inefficiency or an "imbalance" in the price action. This concept is prominently featured within Smart Money Concepts (SMC) and Inner Circle Trader (ICT) methodologies, where such gaps are often interpreted as footprints left by "smart money" due to rapid, forceful price movements. These methodologies suggest that price may later revisit these FVG zones to rebalance a prior inefficiency or to seek liquidity before continuing its path. These gaps are typically identified by a three-bar pattern: Bullish FVG : This is a three-candle formation where the second candle shows a strong upward move. The FVG is the space created between the high of the first candle (bottom of FVG) and the low of the third candle (top of FVG). This indicates a strong upward impulsive move. Bearish FVG : This is a three-candle formation where the second candle shows a strong downward move. The FVG is the space created between the low of the first candle (top of FVG) and the high of the third candle (bottom of FVG). This indicates a strong downward impulsive move. FVGs are often watched by traders as potential areas where price might return to "rebalance" or find support/resistance. Multi-Timeframe (MTF) Analysis The indicator extends FVG detection beyond the current chart's timeframe (Low Timeframe - LTF) to two higher user-defined timeframes: Medium Timeframe (MTF) and High Timeframe (HTF). This allows traders to: Identify FVGs that might be significant on a broader market structure. Observe how FVGs from different timeframes align or interact. Gain a more comprehensive perspective on potential support and resistance zones. FVG State and Lifecycle Management The indicator actively tracks the lifecycle of each detected FVG: Formation : The initial identification of an FVG. Partial Fill (Entry) : When price enters but does not completely pass through the FVG. The indicator updates the "current" top/bottom of the FVG to reflect the filled portion. Midline (Equilibrium) Touch : When price touches the 50% level of the FVG. Full Mitigation : When price completely trades through the FVG, effectively "filling" or "rebalancing" the gap. The indicator records the mitigation time. This state tracking is crucial for understanding how price interacts with these zones. FVG Classification (Large FVG) FVGs can be optionally classified as "Large FVGs" (LV) if their size (top to bottom range) exceeds a user-defined multiple of the Average True Range (ATR) for that FVG's timeframe. This helps distinguish FVGs that are significantly larger relative to recent volatility. Visual Customization and Information Delivery A key concept is providing extensive control over how FVGs are displayed. This control is achieved through a centralized set of visual parameters within the indicator, allowing users to configure numerous aspects (colors, line styles, visibility of boxes, midlines, mitigation lines, labels, etc.) for each timeframe. Additionally, an on-chart information panel summarizes the nearest unmitigated bullish and bearish FVG levels for each active timeframe, providing a quick glance at key price points. █ FEATURES This indicator offers a rich set of features designed to provide a highly customizable and comprehensive Fair Value Gap (FVG) analysis experience. Users can tailor the FVG detection, visual representation, and alerting mechanisms across three distinct timeframes: the current chart (Low Timeframe - LTF), a user-defined Medium Timeframe (MTF), and a user-defined High Timeframe (HTF). Multi-Timeframe FVG Detection and Display The core strength of this indicator lies in its ability to identify and display FVGs from not only the current chart's timeframe (LTF) but also from two higher, user-selectable timeframes (MTF and HTF). Timeframe Selection: Users can specify the exact MTF (e.g., "60", "240") and HTF (e.g., "D", "W") through dedicated inputs in the "MTF (Medium Timeframe)" and "HTF (High Timeframe)" settings groups. The visibility of FVGs from these higher timeframes can be toggled independently using the "Show MTF FVGs" and "Show HTF FVGs" checkboxes. Consistent Detection Logic: The FVG detection logic, based on the classic three-bar imbalance pattern detailed in the 'Concepts' section, is applied consistently across all selected timeframes (LTF, MTF, HTF) Timeframe-Specific Visuals: Each timeframe's FVGs (LTF, MTF, HTF) can be customized with unique colors for bullish/bearish states and their mitigated counterparts. This allows for easy visual differentiation of FVGs originating from different market perspectives. Comprehensive FVG Visualization Options The indicator provides extensive control over how FVGs are visually represented on the chart for each timeframe (LTF, MTF, HTF). FVG Boxes: Visibility: Main FVG boxes can be shown or hidden per timeframe using the "Show FVG Boxes" (for LTF), "Show Boxes" (for MTF/HTF) inputs. Color Customization: Colors for bullish, bearish, active, and mitigated FVG boxes (including Large FVGs, if classified) are fully customizable for each timeframe. Box Extension & Length: FVG boxes can either be extended to the right indefinitely ("Extend Boxes Right") or set to a fixed length in bars ("Short Box Length" or "Box Length" equivalent inputs). Box Labels: Optional labels can display the FVG's timeframe and fill percentage on the box. These labels are configurable for all timeframes (LTF, MTF, and HTF). Please note: If FVGs are positioned very close to each other on the chart, their respective labels may overlap. This can potentially lead to visual clutter, and it is a known behavior in the current version of the indicator. Box Borders: Visibility, width, style (solid, dashed, dotted), and color of FVG box borders are customizable per timeframe. Midlines (Equilibrium/EQ): Visibility: The 50% level (midline or EQ) of FVGs can be shown or hidden for each timeframe. Style Customization: Width, style, and color of the midline are customizable per timeframe. The indicator tracks if this midline has been touched by price. Mitigation Lines: Visibility: Mitigation lines (representing the FVG's opening level that needs to be breached for full mitigation) can be shown or hidden for each timeframe. If shown, these lines are always extended to the right. Style Customization: Width, style, and color of the mitigation line are customizable per timeframe. Mitigation Line Labels: Optional price labels can be displayed on mitigation lines, with a customizable horizontal bar offset for positioning. For optimal label placement, the following horizontal bar offsets are recommended: 4 for LTF, 8 for MTF, and 12 for HTF. Persistence After Mitigation: Users can choose to keep mitigation lines visible even after an FVG is fully mitigated, with a distinct color for such lines. Importantly, this option is only effective if the general setting 'Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs' is disabled, as otherwise, the entire FVG and its lines will be removed upon mitigation. FVG State Management and Behavior The indicator tracks and visually responds to changes in FVG states. Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs: This option, typically found in the indicator's general settings, allows users to automatically remove all visual elements of an FVG from the chart once price has fully mitigated it. This helps maintain chart clarity by focusing on active FVGs. Partial Fill Visualization: When price enters an FVG, the indicator offers a dynamic visual representation: the portion of the FVG that has been filled is shown as a "mitigated box" (typically with a distinct color), while the original FVG box shrinks to clearly highlight the remaining, unfilled portion. This two-part display provides an immediate visual cue about how much of the FVG's imbalance has been addressed and what potential remains within the gap. Visual Filtering by ATR Proximity: To help users focus on the most relevant price action, FVGs can be dynamically hidden if they are located further from the current price than a user-defined multiple of the Average True Range (ATR). This behavior is controlled by the "Filter Band Width (ATR Multiple)" input; setting this to zero disables the filter entirely, ensuring all detected FVGs remain visible regardless of their proximity to price. Alternative Usage Example: Mitigation Lines as Key Support/Resistance Levels For traders preferring a minimalist chart focused on key Fair Value Gap (FVG) levels, the indicator's visualization settings can be customized to display only FVG mitigation lines. This approach leverages these lines as potential support and resistance zones, reflecting areas where price might revisit to address imbalances. To configure this view: Disable FVG Boxes: Turn off "Show FVG Boxes" (for LTF) or "Show Boxes" (for MTF/HTF) for the desired timeframes. Hide Midlines: Disable the visibility of the 50% FVG Midlines (Equilibrium/EQ). Ensure Mitigation Lines are Visible: Keep "Mitigation Lines" enabled. Retain All Mitigation Lines: Disable the "Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs" option in the general settings. Enable the feature to "keep mitigation lines visible even after an FVG is fully mitigated". This ensures lines from all FVGs (active or fully mitigated) remain on the chart, which is only effective if "Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs" is disabled. This setup offers: A Decluttered Chart: Focuses solely on the FVG opening levels. Precise S/R Zones: Treats mitigation lines as specific points for potential price reactions. Historical Level Analysis: Includes lines from past, fully mitigated FVGs for a comprehensive view of significant price levels. For enhanced usability with this focused view, consider these optional additions: The on-chart Information Panel can be activated to display a quick summary of the nearest unmitigated FVG levels. Mitigation Line Labels can also be activated for clear price level identification. A customizable horizontal bar offset is available for positioning these labels; for example, offsets of 4 for LTF, 8 for MTF, and 12 for HTF can be effective. FVG Classification (Large FVG) This feature allows for distinguishing FVGs based on their size relative to market volatility. Enable Classification: Users can enable "Classify FVG (Large FVG)" to identify FVGs that are significantly larger than average. ATR-Based Threshold: An FVG is classified as "Large" if its height (price range) is greater than or equal to the Average True Range (ATR) of its timeframe multiplied by a user-defined "Large FVG Threshold (ATR Multiple)". The ATR period for this calculation is also configurable. Dedicated Colors: Large FVGs (both bullish/bearish and active/mitigated) can be assigned unique colors, making them easily distinguishable on the chart. Panel Icon: Large FVGs are marked with a special icon in the Info Panel. Information Panel An on-chart panel provides a quick summary of the nearest unmitigated FVG levels. Visibility and Position: The panel can be shown/hidden and positioned in any of the nine standard locations on the chart (e.g., Top Right, Middle Center). Content: It displays the price levels of the nearest unmitigated bullish and bearish FVGs for LTF, MTF (if active), and HTF (if active). It also indicates if these nearest FVGs are Large FVGs (if classification is enabled) using a selectable icon. Styling: Text size, border color, header background/text colors, default text color, and "N/A" cell background color are customizable. Highlighting: Background and text colors for the cells displaying the overall nearest bullish and bearish FVG levels (across all active timeframes) can be customized to draw attention to the most proximate FVG. Comprehensive Alert System The indicator offers a granular alert system for various FVG-related events, configurable for each timeframe (LTF, MTF, HTF) independently. Users can enable alerts for: New FVG Formation: Separate alerts for new bullish and new bearish FVG formations. FVG Entry/Partial Fill: Separate alerts for price entering a bullish FVG or a bearish FVG. FVG Full Mitigation: Separate alerts for full mitigation of bullish and bearish FVGs. FVG Midline (EQ) Touch: Separate alerts for price touching the midline of a bullish or bearish FVG. Alert messages are detailed, providing information such as the timeframe, FVG type (bull/bear, Large FVG), relevant price levels, and timestamps. █ NOTES This section provides additional information regarding the indicator's usage, performance considerations, and potential interactions with the TradingView platform. Understanding these points can help users optimize their experience and troubleshoot effectively. Performance and Resource Management Maximum FVGs to Track : The "Max FVGs to Track" input (defaulting to 25) limits the number of FVG objects processed for each category (e.g., LTF Bullish, MTF Bearish). Increasing this value significantly can impact performance due to more objects being iterated over and potentially drawn, especially when multiple timeframes are active. Drawing Object Limits : To manage performance, this script sets its own internal limits on the number of drawing objects it displays. While it allows for up to approximately 500 lines (max_lines_count=500) and 500 labels (max_labels_count=500), the number of FVG boxes is deliberately restricted to a maximum of 150 (max_boxes_count=150). This specific limit for boxes is a key performance consideration: displaying too many boxes can significantly slow down the indicator, and a very high number is often not essential for analysis. Enabling all visual elements for many FVGs across all three timeframes can cause the indicator to reach these internal limits, especially the stricter box limit Optimization Strategies : To help you manage performance, reduce visual clutter, and avoid exceeding drawing limits when using this indicator, I recommend the following strategies: Maintain or Lower FVG Tracking Count: The "Max FVGs to Track" input defaults to 25. I find this value generally sufficient for effective analysis and balanced performance. You can keep this default or consider reducing it further if you experience performance issues or prefer a less dense FVG display. Utilize Proximity Filtering: I suggest activating the "Filter Band Width (ATR Multiple)" option (found under "General Settings") to display only those FVGs closer to the current price. From my experience, a value of 5 for the ATR multiple often provides a good starting point for balanced performance, but you should feel free to adjust this based on market volatility and your specific trading needs. Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs: I strongly recommend enabling the "Hide Fully Mitigated FVGs" option. This setting automatically removes all visual elements of an FVG from the chart once it has been fully mitigated by price. Doing so significantly reduces the number of active drawing objects, lessens computational load, and helps maintain chart clarity by focusing only on active, relevant FVGs. Disable FVG Display for Unused Timeframes: If you are not actively monitoring certain higher timeframes (MTF or HTF) for FVG analysis, I advise disabling their display by unchecking "Show MTF FVGs" or "Show HTF FVGs" respectively. This can provide a significant performance boost. Simplify Visual Elements: For active FVGs, consider hiding less critical visual elements if they are not essential for your specific analysis. This could include box labels, borders, or even entire FVG boxes if, for example, only the mitigation lines are of interest for a particular timeframe. Settings Changes and Platform Limits : This indicator is comprehensive and involves numerous calculations and drawings. When multiple settings are changed rapidly in quick succession, it is possible, on occasion, for TradingView to issue a "Runtime error: modify_study_limit_exceeding" or similar. This can cause the indicator to temporarily stop updating or display errors. Recommended Approach : When adjusting settings, it is advisable to wait a brief moment (a few seconds) after each significant change. This allows the indicator to reprocess and update on the chart before another change is made Error Recovery : Should such a runtime error occur, making a minor, different adjustment in the settings (e.g., toggling a checkbox off and then on again) and waiting briefly will typically allow the indicator to recover and resume correct operation. This behavior is related to platform limitations when handling complex scripts with many inputs and drawing objects. Multi-Timeframe (MTF/HTF) Data and Behavior HTF FVG Confirmation is Essential: : For an FVG from a higher timeframe (MTF or HTF) to be identified and displayed on your current chart (LTF), the three-bar pattern forming the FVG on that higher timeframe must consist of fully closed bars. The indicator does not draw speculative FVGs based on incomplete/forming bars from higher timeframes. Data Retrieval and LTF Processing: The indicator may use techniques like lookahead = barmerge.lookahead_on for timely data retrieval from higher timeframes. However, the actual detection of an FVG occurs after all its constituent bars on the HTF have closed. Appearance Timing on LTF (1 LTF Candle Delay): As a natural consequence of this, an FVG that is confirmed on an HTF (i.e., its third bar closes) will typically become visible on your LTF chart one LTF bar after its confirmation on the HTF. Example: Assume an FVG forms on a 30-minute chart at 15:30 (i.e., with the close of the 30-minute bar that covers the 15:00-15:30 period). If you are monitoring this FVG on a 15-minute chart, the indicator will detect this newly formed 30-minute FVG while processing the data for the 15-minute bar that starts at 15:30 and closes at 15:45. Therefore, the 30-minute FVG will become visible on your 15-minute chart at the earliest by 15:45 (i.e., with the close of that relevant 15-minute LTF candle). This means the HTF FVG is reflected on the LTF chart with a delay equivalent to one LTF candle. FVG Detection and Display Logic Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) on the current chart timeframe (LTF) are detected based on barstate.isconfirmed. This means the three-bar pattern must be complete with closed bars before an FVG is identified. This confirmation method prevents FVGs from being prematurely identified on the forming bar. Alerts Alert Setup : To receive alerts from this indicator, you must first ensure you have enabled the specific alert conditions you are interested in within the indicator's own settings (see 'Comprehensive Alert System' under the 'FEATURES' section). Once configured, open TradingView's 'Create Alert' dialog. In the 'Condition' tab, select this indicator's name, and crucially, choose the 'Any alert() function call' option from the dropdown list. This setup allows the indicator to trigger alerts based on the precise event conditions you have activated in its settings Alert Frequency : Alerts are designed to trigger once per bar close (alert.freq_once_per_bar_close) for the specific event. User Interface (UI) Tips Settings Group Icons: In the indicator settings menu, timeframe-specific groups are marked with star icons for easier navigation: 🌟 for LTF (Current Chart Timeframe), 🌟🌟 for MTF (Medium Timeframe), and 🌟🌟🌟 for HTF (High Timeframe). Dependent Inputs: Some input settings are dependent on others being enabled. These dependencies are visually indicated in the settings menu using symbols like "↳" (dependent setting on the next line), "⟷" (mutually exclusive inline options), or "➜" (directly dependent inline option). Settings Layout Overview: The indicator settings are organized into logical groups for ease of use. Key global display controls – such as toggles for MTF FVGs, HTF FVGs (along with their respective timeframe selectors), and the Information Panel – are conveniently located at the very top within the '⚙️ General Settings' group. This placement allows for quick access to frequently adjusted settings. Other sections provide detailed customization options for each timeframe (LTF, MTF, HTF), specific FVG components, and alert configurations. █ FOR Pine Script® CODERS This section provides a high-level overview of the FVG Premium indicator's internal architecture, data flow, and the interaction between its various library components. It is intended for Pine Script™ programmers who wish to understand the indicator's design, potentially extend its functionality, or learn from its structure. System Architecture and Modular Design The indicator is architected moduarly, leveraging several custom libraries to separate concerns and enhance code organization and reusability. Each library has a distinct responsibility: FvgTypes: Serves as the foundational data definition layer. It defines core User-Defined Types (UDTs) like fvgObject (for storing all attributes of an FVG) and drawSettings (for visual configurations), along with enumerations like tfType. CommonUtils: Provides utility functions for common tasks like mapping user string inputs (e.g., "Dashed" for line style) to their corresponding Pine Script™ constants (e.g., line.style_dashed) and formatting timeframe strings for display. FvgCalculations: Contains the core logic for FVG detection (both LTF and MTF/HTF via requestMultiTFBarData), FVG classification (Large FVGs based on ATR), and checking FVG interactions with price (mitigation, partial fill). FvgObject: Implements an object-oriented approach by attaching methods to the fvgObject UDT. These methods manage the entire visual lifecycle of an FVG on the chart, including drawing, updating based on state changes (e.g., mitigation), and deleting drawing objects. It's responsible for applying the visual configurations defined in drawSettings. FvgPanel: Manages the creation and dynamic updates of the on-chart information panel, which displays key FVG levels. The main indicator script acts as the orchestrator, initializing these libraries, managing user inputs, processing data flow between libraries, and handling the main event loop (bar updates) for FVG state management and alerts. Core Data Flow and FVG Lifecycle Management The general data flow and FVG lifecycle can be summarized as follows: Input Processing: User inputs from the "Settings" dialog are read by the main indicator script. Visual style inputs (colors, line styles, etc.) are consolidated into a types.drawSettings object (defined in FvgTypes). Other inputs (timeframes, filter settings, alert toggles) control the behavior of different modules. CommonUtils assists in mapping some string inputs to Pine constants. FVG Detection: For the current chart timeframe (LTF), FvgCalculations.detectFvg() identifies potential FVGs based on bar patterns. For MTF/HTF, the main indicator script calls FvgCalculations.requestMultiTFBarData() to fetch necessary bar data from higher timeframes, then FvgCalculations.detectMultiTFFvg() identifies FVGs. Newly detected FVGs are instantiated as types.fvgObject and stored in arrays within the main script. These objects also undergo classification (e.g., Large FVG) by FvgCalculations. State Update & Interaction: On each bar, the main indicator script iterates through active FVG objects to manage their state based on price interaction: Initially, the main script calls FvgCalculations.fvgInteractionCheck() to efficiently determine if the current bar's price might be interacting with a given FVG. If a potential interaction is flagged, the main script then invokes methods directly on the fvgObject instance (e.g., updateMitigation(), updatePartialFill(), checkMidlineTouch(), which are part of FvgObject). These fvgObject methods are responsible for the detailed condition checking and the actual modification of the FVG's state. For instance, the updateMitigation() and updatePartialFill() methods internally utilize specific helper functions from FvgCalculations (like checkMitigation() and checkPartialMitigation()) to confirm the precise nature of the interaction before updating the fvgObject’s state fields (such as isMitigated, currentTop, currentBottom, or isMidlineTouched). Visual Rendering: The FvgObject.updateDrawings() method is called for each fvgObject. This method is central to drawing management; it creates, updates, or deletes chart drawings (boxes, lines, labels) based on the FVG's current state, its prev_* (previous bar state) fields for optimization, and the visual settings passed via the drawSettings object. Information Panel Update: The main indicator script determines the nearest FVG levels, populates a panelData object (defined in FvgPanelLib), and calls FvgPanel.updatePanel() to refresh the on-chart display. Alert Generation: Based on the updated FVG states and user-enabled alert settings, the main indicator script constructs and triggers alerts using Pine Script's alert() function." Key Design Considerations UDT-Centric Design: The fvgObject UDT is pivotal, acting as a stateful container for all information related to a single FVG. Most operations revolve around creating, updating, or querying these objects. State Management: To optimize drawing updates and manage FVG lifecycles, fvgObject instances store their previous bar's state (e.g., prevIsVisible, prevCurrentTop). The FvgObject.updateDrawings() method uses this to determine if a redraw is necessary, minimizing redundant drawing calls. Settings Object: A drawSettings object is populated once (or when inputs change) and passed to drawing functions. This avoids repeatedly reading numerous input() values on every bar or within loops, improving performance. Dynamic Arrays for FVG Storage: Arrays are used to store collections of fvgObject instances, allowing for dynamic management (adding new FVGs, iterating for updates).
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh no1x
4
Multi-Fibonacci Trend Average[FibonacciFlux]Multi-Fibonacci Trend Average (MFTA): An Institutional-Grade Trend Confluence Indicator for Discerning Market Participants My original indicator/Strategy: Engineered for the sophisticated demands of institutional and advanced traders, the Multi-Fibonacci Trend Average (MFTA) indicator represents a paradigm shift in technical analysis. This meticulously crafted tool is designed to furnish high-definition trend signals within the complexities of modern financial markets. Anchored in the rigorous principles of Fibonacci ratios and augmented by advanced averaging methodologies, MFTA delivers a granular perspective on trend dynamics. Its integration of Multi-Timeframe (MTF) filters provides unparalleled signal robustness, empowering strategic decision-making with a heightened degree of confidence. MFTA indicator on BTCUSDT 15min chart with 1min RSI and MACD filters enabled. Note the refined signal generation with reduced noise. MFTA indicator on BTCUSDT 15min chart without MTF filters. While capturing more potential trading opportunities, it also generates a higher frequency of signals, including potential false positives. Core Innovation: Proprietary Fibonacci-Enhanced Supertrend Averaging Engine The MFTA indicator’s core innovation lies in its proprietary implementation of Supertrend analysis, strategically fortified by Fibonacci ratios to construct a truly dynamic volatility envelope. Departing from conventional Supertrend methodologies, MFTA autonomously computes not one, but three distinct Supertrend lines. Each of these lines is uniquely parameterized by a specific Fibonacci factor: 0.618 (Weak), 1.618 (Medium/Golden Ratio), and 2.618 (Strong/Extended Fibonacci). // Fibonacci-based factors for multiple Supertrend calculations factor1 = input.float(0.618, 'Factor 1 (Weak/Fibonacci)', minval=0.01, step=0.01, tooltip='Factor 1 (Weak/Fibonacci)', group="Fibonacci Supertrend") factor2 = input.float(1.618, 'Factor 2 (Medium/Golden Ratio)', minval=0.01, step=0.01, tooltip='Factor 2 (Medium/Golden Ratio)', group="Fibonacci Supertrend") factor3 = input.float(2.618, 'Factor 3 (Strong/Extended Fib)', minval=0.01, step=0.01, tooltip='Factor 3 (Strong/Extended Fib)', group="Fibonacci Supertrend") This multi-faceted architecture adeptly captures a spectrum of market volatility sensitivities, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of prevailing conditions. Subsequently, the indicator algorithmically synthesizes these disparate Supertrend lines through arithmetic averaging. To achieve optimal signal fidelity and mitigate inherent market noise, this composite average is further refined utilizing an Exponential Moving Average (EMA). // Calculate average of the three supertends and a smoothed version superlength = input.int(21, 'Smoothing Length', tooltip='Smoothing Length for Average Supertrend', group="Fibonacci Supertrend") average_trend = (supertrend1 + supertrend2 + supertrend3) / 3 smoothed_trend = ta.ema(average_trend, superlength) The resultant ‘Smoothed Trend’ line emerges as a remarkably responsive yet stable trend demarcation, offering demonstrably superior clarity and precision compared to singular Supertrend implementations, particularly within the turbulent dynamics of high-volatility markets. Elevated Signal Confluence: Integrated Multi-Timeframe (MTF) Validation Suite MFTA transcends the limitations of conventional trend indicators by incorporating an advanced suite of three independent MTF filters: RSI, MACD, and Volume. These filters function as sophisticated validation protocols, rigorously ensuring that only signals exhibiting a confluence of high-probability factors are brought to the forefront. 1. Granular Lower Timeframe RSI Momentum Filter The Relative Strength Index (RSI) filter, computed from a user-defined lower timeframe, furnishes critical momentum-based signal validation. By meticulously monitoring RSI dynamics on an accelerated timeframe, traders gain the capacity to evaluate underlying momentum strength with precision, prior to committing to signal execution on the primary chart timeframe. // --- Lower Timeframe RSI Filter --- ltf_rsi_filter_enable = input.bool(false, title="Enable RSI Filter", group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Use RSI from lower timeframe as a filter") ltf_rsi_timeframe = input.timeframe("1", title="RSI Timeframe", group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Timeframe for RSI calculation") ltf_rsi_length = input.int(14, title="RSI Length", minval=1, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Length for RSI calculation") ltf_rsi_threshold = input.int(30, title="RSI Threshold", minval=0, maxval=100, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="RSI value threshold for filtering signals") 2. Convergent Lower Timeframe MACD Trend-Momentum Filter The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) filter, also calculated on a lower timeframe basis, introduces a critical layer of trend-momentum convergence confirmation. The bullish signal configuration rigorously mandates that the MACD line be definitively positioned above the Signal line on the designated lower timeframe. This stringent condition ensures a robust indication of converging momentum that aligns synergistically with the prevailing trend identified on the primary timeframe. // --- Lower Timeframe MACD Filter --- ltf_macd_filter_enable = input.bool(false, title="Enable MACD Filter", group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Use MACD from lower timeframe as a filter") ltf_macd_timeframe = input.timeframe("1", title="MACD Timeframe", group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Timeframe for MACD calculation") ltf_macd_fast_length = input.int(12, title="MACD Fast Length", minval=1, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Fast EMA length for MACD") ltf_macd_slow_length = input.int(26, title="MACD Slow Length", minval=1, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Slow EMA length for MACD") ltf_macd_signal_length = input.int(9, title="MACD Signal Length", minval=1, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Signal SMA length for MACD") 3. Definitive Volume Confirmation Filter The Volume Filter functions as an indispensable arbiter of trade conviction. By establishing a dynamic volume threshold, defined as a percentage relative to the average volume over a user-specified lookback period, traders can effectively ensure that all generated signals are rigorously validated by demonstrably increased trading activity. This pivotal validation step signifies robust market participation, substantially diminishing the potential for spurious or false breakout signals. // --- Volume Filter --- volume_filter_enable = input.bool(false, title="Enable Volume Filter", group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Use volume level as a filter") volume_threshold_percent = input.int(title="Volume Threshold (%)", defval=150, minval=100, group="MTF Filters", tooltip="Minimum volume percentage compared to average volume to allow signal (100% = average)") These meticulously engineered filters operate in synergistic confluence, requiring all enabled filters to definitively satisfy their pre-defined conditions before a Buy or Sell signal is generated. This stringent multi-layered validation process drastically minimizes the incidence of false positive signals, thereby significantly enhancing entry precision and overall signal reliability. Intuitive Visual Architecture & Actionable Intelligence MFTA provides a demonstrably intuitive and visually rich charting environment, meticulously delineating trend direction and momentum through precisely color-coded plots: Average Supertrend: Thin line, green/red for uptrend/downtrend, immediate directional bias. Smoothed Supertrend: Bold line, teal/purple for uptrend/downtrend, cleaner, institutionally robust trend. Dynamic Trend Fill: Green/red fill between Supertrends quantifies trend strength and momentum. Adaptive Background Coloring: Light green/red background mirrors Smoothed Supertrend direction, holistic trend perspective. Precision Buy/Sell Signals: ‘BUY’/‘SELL’ labels appear on chart when trend touch and MTF filter confluence are satisfied, facilitating high-conviction trade action. MFTA indicator applied to BTCUSDT 4-hour chart, showcasing its effectiveness on higher timeframes. The Smoothed Length parameter is increased to 200 for enhanced smoothness on this timeframe, coupled with 1min RSI and Volume filters for signal refinement. This illustrates the indicator's adaptability across different timeframes and market conditions. Strategic Applications for Institutional Mandates MFTA’s sophisticated design provides distinct advantages for advanced trading operations and institutional investment mandates. Key strategic applications include: High-Probability Trend Identification: Fibonacci-averaged Supertrend with MTF filters robustly identifies high-probability trend continuations and reversals, enhancing alpha generation. Precision Entry/Exit Signals: Volume and momentum-filtered signals enable institutional-grade precision for optimized risk-adjusted returns. Algorithmic Trading Integration: Clear signal logic facilitates seamless integration into automated trading systems for scalable strategy deployment. Multi-Asset/Timeframe Versatility: Adaptable parameters ensure applicability across diverse asset classes and timeframes, catering to varied trading mandates. Enhanced Risk Management: Superior signal fidelity from MTF filters inherently reduces false signals, supporting robust risk management protocols. Granular Customization and Parameterized Control MFTA offers unparalleled customization, empowering users to fine-tune parameters for precise alignment with specific trading styles and market conditions. Key adjustable parameters include: Fibonacci Factors: Adjust Supertrend sensitivity to volatility regimes. ATR Length: Control volatility responsiveness in Supertrend calculations. Smoothing Length: Refine Smoothed Trend line responsiveness and noise reduction. MTF Filter Parameters: Independently configure timeframes, lookback periods, and thresholds for RSI, MACD, and Volume filters for optimal signal filtering. Disclaimer MFTA is meticulously engineered for high-quality trend signals; however, no indicator guarantees profit. Market conditions are unpredictable, and trading involves substantial risk. Rigorous backtesting and forward testing across diverse datasets, alongside a comprehensive understanding of the indicator's logic, are essential before live deployment. Past performance is not indicative of future results. MFTA is for informational and analytical purposes only and is not financial or investment advice.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh FibonacciFlux
4
`security()` revisited [PineCoders]NOTE The non-repainting technique in this publication that relies on bar states is now deprecated, as we have identified inconsistencies that undermine its credibility as a universal solution. The outputs that use the technique are still available for reference in this publication. However, we do not endorse its usage. See this publication for more information about the current best practices for requesting HTF data and why they work. █  OVERVIEW This script presents a new function to help coders use security() in both repainting and non-repainting modes. We revisit this often misunderstood and misused function, and explain its behavior in different contexts, in the hope of dispelling some of the coder lure surrounding it. The function is incredibly powerful, yet misused, it can become a dangerous WMD and an instrument of deception, for both coders and traders. We will discuss:  • How to use our new `f_security()` function.  • The behavior of Pine code and security() on the three very different types of bars that make up any chart.  • Why what you see on a chart is a simulation, and should be taken with a grain of salt.  • Why we are presenting a new version of a function handling security() calls.  • Other topics of interest to coders using higher timeframe (HTF) data. █  WARNING We have tried to deliver a function that is simple to use and will, in non-repainting mode, produce reliable results for both experienced and novice coders. If you are a novice coder, stick to our recommendations to avoid getting into trouble, and DO NOT change our `f_security()` function when using it. Use `false` as the function's last argument and refrain from using your script at smaller timeframes than the chart's. To call our function to fetch a non-repainting value of close from the 1D timeframe, use: f_security(_sym, _res, _src, _rep) => security(_sym, _res, _src ) previousDayClose = f_security(syminfo.tickerid, "D", close, false) If that's all you're interested in, you are done. If you choose to ignore our recommendation and use the function in repainting mode by changing the `false` in there for `true`, we sincerely hope you read the rest of our ramblings before you do so, to understand the consequences of your choice. Let's now have a look at what security() is showing you. There is a lot to cover, so buckle up! But before we dig in, one last thing. What is a chart? A chart is a graphic representation of events that occur in markets. As any representation, it is not reality, but rather a model of reality. As Scott Page eloquently states in The Model Thinker : "All models are wrong; many are useful". Having in mind that both chart bars and plots on our charts are imperfect and incomplete renderings of what actually occurred in realtime markets puts us coders in a place from where we can better understand the nature of, and the causes underlying the inevitable compromises necessary to build the data series our code uses, and print chart bars. Traders or coders complaining that charts do not reflect reality act like someone who would complain that the word "dog" is not a real dog. Let's recognize that we are dealing with models here, and try to understand them the best we can. Sure, models can be improved; TradingView is constantly improving the quality of the information displayed on charts, but charts nevertheless remain mere translations. Plots of data fetched through security() being modelized renderings of what occurs at higher timeframes, coders will build more useful and reliable tools for both themselves and traders if they endeavor to perfect their understanding of the abstractions they are working with. We hope this publication helps you in this pursuit. █  FEATURES This script's "Inputs" tab has four settings:  • Repaint : Determines whether the functions will use their repainting or non-repainting mode.   Note that the setting will not affect the behavior of the yellow plot, as it always repaints.  • Source : The source fetched by the security() calls.  • Timeframe : The timeframe used for the security() calls. If it is lower than the chart's timeframe, a warning appears.  • Show timeframe reminder : Displays a reminder of the timeframe after the last bar. █  THE CHART The chart shows two different pieces of information and we want to discuss other topics in this section, so we will be covering:  A — The type of chart bars we are looking at, indicated by the colored band at the top.  B — The plots resulting of calling security() with the close price in different ways.  C — Points of interest on the chart. A — Chart bars The colored band at the top shows the three types of bars that any chart on a live market will print. It is critical for coders to understand the important distinctions between each type of bar:  1 — Gray : Historical bars, which are bars that were already closed when the script was run on them.  2 — Red : Elapsed realtime bars, i.e., realtime bars that have run their course and closed.    The state of script calculations showing on those bars is that of the last time they were made, when the realtime bar closed.  3 — Green : The realtime bar. Only the rightmost bar on the chart can be the realtime bar at any given time, and only when the chart's market is active. Refer to the Pine User Manual's Execution model page for a more detailed explanation of these types of bars. B — Plots The chart shows the result of letting our 5sec chart run for a few minutes with the following settings: "Repaint" = "On" (the default is "Off"), "Source" = `close` and "Timeframe" = 1min. The five lines plotted are the following. They have progressively thinner widths:  1 — Yellow : A normal, repainting security() call.  2 — Silver : Our recommended security() function.  3 — Fuchsia : Our recommended way of achieving the same result as our security() function, for cases when the source used is a function returning a tuple.  4 — White : The method we previously recommended in our MTF Selection Framework , which uses two distinct security() calls.  5 — Black : A lame attempt at fooling traders that MUST be avoided. All lines except the first one in yellow will vary depending on the "Repaint" setting in the script's inputs. The first plot does not change because, contrary to all other plots, it contains no conditional code to adapt to repainting/no-repainting modes; it is a simple security() call showing its default behavior. C — Points of interest on the chart Historical bars do not show actual repainting behavior To appreciate what a repainting security()  call will plot in realtime, one must look at the realtime bar and at elapsed realtime bars, the bars where the top line is green or red on the chart at the top of this page. There you can see how the plots go up and down, following the close value of each successive chart bar making up a single bar of the higher timeframe. You would see the same behavior in "Replay" mode. In the realtime bar, the movement of repainting plots will vary with the source you are fetching: open will not move after a new timeframe opens, low and high will change when a new low or high are found, close will follow the last feed update. If you are fetching a value calculated by a function, it may also change on each update. Now notice how different the plots are on historical bars. There, the plot shows the close of the previously completed timeframe for the whole duration of the current timeframe, until on its last bar the price updates to the current timeframe's close when it is confirmed (if the timeframe's last bar is missing, the plot will only update on the next timeframe's first bar). That last bar is the only one showing where the plot would end if that timeframe's bars had elapsed in realtime. If one doesn't understand this, one cannot properly visualize how his script will calculate in realtime when using repainting. Additionally, as published scripts typically show charts where the script has only run on historical bars, they are, in fact, misleading traders who will naturally assume the script will behave the same way on realtime bars. Non-repainting plots are more accurate on historical bars Now consider this chart, where we are using the same settings as on the chart used to publish this script, except that we have turned "Repainting" off this time: The yellow line here is our reference, repainting line, so although repainting is turned off, it is still repainting, as expected. Because repainting is now off, however, plots on historical bars show the previous timeframe's close until the first bar of a new timeframe, at which point the plot updates. This correctly reflects the behavior of the script in the realtime bar, where because we are offsetting the series by one, we are always showing the previously calculated—and thus confirmed—higher timeframe value. This means that in realtime, we will only get the previous timeframe's values one bar after the timeframe's last bar has elapsed, at the open of the first bar of a new timeframe. Historical and elapsed realtime bars will not actually show this nuance because they reflect the state of calculations made on their close , but we can see the plot update on that bar nonetheless. ► This more accurate representation on historical bars of what will happen in the realtime bar is one of the two key reasons why using non-repainting data is preferable.    The other is that in realtime, your script will be using more reliable data and behave more consistently. Misleading plots Valiant attempts by coders to show non-repainting, higher timeframe data updating earlier than on our chart are futile. If updates occur one bar earlier because coders use the repainting version of the function, then so be it, but they must then also accept that their historical bars are not displaying information that is as accurate. Not informing script users of this is to mislead them. Coders should also be aware that if they choose to use repainting data in realtime, they are sacrificing reliability to speed and may be running a strategy that behaves very differently from the one they backtested, thus invalidating their tests. When, however, coders make what are supposed to be non-repainting plots plot artificially early on historical bars, as in examples "c4" and "c5" of our script, they would want us to believe they have achieved the miracle of time travel. Our understanding of the current state of science dictates that for now, this is impossible. Using such techniques in scripts is plainly misleading, and public scripts using them will be moderated. We are coding trading tools here—not video games. Elementary ethics prescribe that we should not mislead traders, even if it means not being able to show sexy plots. As the great Feynman said: You should not fool the layman when you're talking as a scientist. You can readily appreciate the fantasy plot of "c4", the thinnest line in black, by comparing its supposedly non-repainting behavior between historical bars and realtime bars. After updating—by miracle—as early as the wide yellow line that is repainting, it suddenly moves in a more realistic place when the script is running in realtime, in synch with our non-repainting lines. The "c5" version does not plot on the chart, but it displays in the Data Window. It is even worse than "c4" in that it also updates magically early on historical bars, but goes on to evaluate like the repainting yellow line in realtime, except one bar late. Data Window The Data Window shows the values of the chart's plots, then the values of both the inside and outside offsets used in our calculations, so you can see them change bar by bar. Notice their differences between historical and elapsed realtime bars, and the realtime bar itself. If you do not know about the Data Window, have a look at this essential tool for Pine coders in the Pine User Manual's page on Debugging . The conditional expressions used to calculate the offsets may seem tortuous but their objective is quite simple. When repainting is on, we use this form, so with no offset on all bars: security(ticker, i_timeframe, i_source ) // which is equivalent to: security(ticker, i_timeframe, i_source) When repainting is off, we use two different and inverted offsets on historical bars and the realtime bar: // Historical bars: security(ticker, i_timeframe, i_source ) // Realtime bar (and thus, elapsed realtime bars): security(ticker, i_timeframe, i_source ) The offsets in the first line show how we prevent repainting on historical bars without the need for the `lookahead` parameter. We use the value of the function call on the chart's previous bar. Since values between the repainting and non-repainting versions only differ on the timeframe's last bar, we can use the previous value so that the update only occurs on the timeframe's first bar, as it will in realtime when not repainting. In the realtime bar, we use the second call, where the offsets are inverted. This is because if we used the first call in realtime, we would be fetching the value of the repainting function on the previous bar, so the close of the last bar. What we want, instead, is the data from the previous, higher timeframe bar , which has elapsed and is confirmed, and thus will not change throughout realtime bars, except on the first constituent chart bar belonging to a new higher timeframe. After the offsets, the Data Window shows values for the `barstate.*` variables we use in our calculations. █  NOTES Why are we revisiting security()  ? For four reasons:  1 — We were seeing coders misuse our `f_secureSecurity()` function presented in How to avoid repainting when using security() .    Some novice coders were modifying the offset used with the history-referencing operator in the function, making it zero instead of one,    which to our horror, caused look-ahead bias when used with `lookahead = barmerge.lookahead_on`.    We wanted to present a safer function which avoids introducing the dreaded "lookahead" in the scripts of unsuspecting coders.  2 — The popularity of security() in screener-type scripts where coders need to use the full 40 calls allowed per script made us want to propose    a solid method of allowing coders to offer a repainting/no-repainting choice to their script users with only one security() call.  3 — We wanted to explain why some alternatives we see circulating are inadequate and produce misleading behavior.  4 — Our previous publication on security() focused on how to avoid repainting, yet many other considerations worthy of attention are not related to repainting. Handling tuples When sending function calls that return tuples with security() , our `f_security()` function will not work because Pine does not allow us to use the history-referencing operator with tuple return values. The solution is to integrate the inside offset to your function's arguments, use it to offset the results the function is returning, and then add the outside offset in a reassignment of the tuple variables, after security() returns its values to the script, as we do in our "c2" example. Does it repaint? We're pretty sure Wilder was not asked very often if RSI repainted. Why? Because it wasn't in fashion—and largely unnecessary—to ask that sort of question in the 80's. Many traders back then used daily charts only, and indicator values were calculated at the day's close, so everybody knew what they were getting. Additionally, indicator values were calculated by generally reputable outfits or traders themselves, so data was pretty reliable. Today, almost anybody can write a simple indicator, and the programming languages used to write them are complex enough for some coders lacking the caution, know-how or ethics of the best professional coders, to get in over their heads and produce code that does not work the way they think it does. As we hope to have clearly demonstrated, traders do have legitimate cause to ask if MTF scripts repaint or not when authors do not specify it in their script's description. ► We recommend that authors always use our `f_security()` with `false` as the last argument to avoid repainting when fetching data dependent on OHLCV information. This is the only way to obtain reliable HTF data. If you want to offer users a choice, make non-repainting mode the default, so that if users choose repainting, it will be their responsibility. Non-repainting security() calls are also the only way for scripts to show historical behavior that matches the script's realtime behavior, so you are not misleading traders. Additionally, non-repainting HTF data is the only way that non-repainting alerts can be configured on MTF scripts, as users of MTF scripts cannot prevent their alerts from repainting by simply configuring them to trigger on the bar's close. Data feeds A chart at one timeframe is made up of multiple feeds that mesh seamlessly to form one chart. Historical bars can use one feed, and the realtime bar another, which brokers/exchanges can sometimes update retroactively so that elapsed realtime bars will reappear with very slight modifications when the browser's tab is refreshed. Intraday and daily chart prices also very often originate from different feeds supplied by brokers/exchanges. That is why security() calls at higher timeframes may be using a completely different feed than the chart, and explains why the daily high value, for example, can vary between timeframes. Volume information can also vary considerably between intraday and daily feeds in markets like stocks, because more volume information becomes available at the end of day. It is thus expected behavior—and not a bug—to see data variations between timeframes. Another point to keep in mind concerning feeds it that when you are using a repainting security() plot in realtime, you will sometimes see discrepancies between its plot and the realtime bars. An artefact revealing these inconsistencies can be seen when security() plots sometimes skip a realtime chart bar during periods of high market activity. This occurs because of races between the chart and the security() feeds, which are being monitored by independent, concurrent processes. A blue arrow on the chart indicates such an occurrence. This is another cause of repainting, where realtime bar-building logic can produce different outcomes on one closing price. It is also another argument supporting our recommendation to use non-repainting data. Alternatives There is an alternative to using security() in some conditions. If all you need are OHLC prices of a higher timeframe, you can use a technique like the one Duyck demonstrates in his security free MTF example - JD script. It has the great advantage of displaying actual repainting values on historical bars, which mimic the code's behavior in the realtime bar—or at least on elapsed realtime bars, contrary to a repainting security() plot. It has the disadvantage of using the current chart's TF data feed prices, whereas higher timeframe data feeds may contain different and more reliable prices when they are compiled at the end of the day. In its current state, it also does not allow for a repainting/no-repainting choice. When `lookahead` is useful When retrieving non-price data, or in special cases, for experiments, it can be useful to use `lookahead`. One example is our Backtesting on Non-Standard Charts: Caution! script where we are fetching prices of standard chart bars from non-standard charts. Warning users Normal use of security() dictates that it only be used at timeframes equal to or higher than the chart's. To prevent users from inadvertently using your script in contexts where it will not produce expected behavior, it is good practice to warn them when their chart is on a higher timeframe than the one in the script's "Timeframe" field. Our `f_tfReminderAndErrorCheck()` function in this script does that. It can also print a reminder of the higher timeframe. It uses one security() call. Intrabar timeframes security() is not supported by TradingView when used with timeframes lower than the chart's. While it is still possible to use security() at intrabar timeframes, it then behaves differently. If no care is taken to send a function specifically written to handle the successive intrabars, security() will return the value of the last intrabar in the chart's timeframe, so the last 1H bar in the current 1D bar, if called at "60" from a "D" chart timeframe. If you are an advanced coder, see our FAQ entry on the techniques involved in processing intrabar timeframes. Using intrabar timeframes comes with important limitations, which you must understand and explain to traders if you choose to make scripts using the technique available to others. Special care should also be taken to thoroughly test this type of script. Novice coders should refrain from getting involved in this. █  TERMINOLOGY Timeframe Timeframe , interval and resolution are all being used to name the concept of timeframe. We have, in the past, used "timeframe" and "resolution" more or less interchangeably. Recently, members from the Pine and PineCoders team have decided to settle on "timeframe", so from hereon we will be sticking to that term. Multi-timeframe (MTF) Some coders use "multi-timeframe" or "MTF" to name what are in fact "multi-period" calculations, as when they use MAs of progressively longer periods. We consider that a misleading use of "multi-timeframe", which should be reserved for code using calculations actually made from another timeframe's context and using security() , safe for scripts like Duyck's one mentioned earlier, or TradingView's Relative  Volume  at  Time , which use a user-selected timeframe as an anchor to reset calculations. Calculations made at the chart's timeframe by varying the period of MAs or other rolling window calculations should be called "multi-period", and "MTF-anchored" could be used for scripts that reset calculations on timeframe boundaries. Colophon Our script was written using the PineCoders Coding Conventions for Pine . The description was formatted using the techniques explained in the How We Write and Format Script Descriptions PineCoders publication. Snippets were lifted from our MTF Selection Framework , then massaged to create the `f_tfReminderAndErrorCheck()` function. █  THANKS Thanks to apozdnyakov for his help with the innards of security() . Thanks to bmistiaen for proofreading our description. Look first. Then leap.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh PineCoders
60
Multi Timeframe Relative Strength Index {DCAquant}Overview The Multi Timeframe Relative Strength Index (MTF RSI) is a powerful technical analysis tool designed to provide insights into market momentum and potential trend reversals across multiple timeframes. Leveraging the Relative Strength Index (RSI) formula, this indicator offers traders a comprehensive view of market sentiment and identifies overbought and oversold conditions. Key Features RSI Calculation: Utilizes the standard RSI calculation formula to measure the magnitude of recent price changes and assess the strength of market trends. Employs a user-defined length parameter to customize the sensitivity of the RSI calculation based on trading preferences. Multiple Timeframe Analysis: Allows traders to analyze RSI values across up to six different timeframes, ranging from minutes to days, providing a holistic perspective on market dynamics. Calculates RSI values independently for each selected timeframe, enabling comparison and trend identification. Threshold Levels: Defines overbought and oversold levels to highlight potential reversal points in market trends. Offers flexibility in adjusting threshold levels based on individual risk tolerance and trading strategies. Neutral Zone: Establishes upper and lower neutral thresholds to identify periods of consolidation or sideways movement in price. Helps traders distinguish between trending and ranging market conditions for more accurate analysis. Moving Average Smoothing: Provides the option to apply moving average smoothing to aggregated RSI values for enhanced clarity and reduced noise. Enables smoother visualization of RSI trends, facilitating easier interpretation for traders. Visual Representation: Plots the aggregated MTF RSI values on the price chart, allowing traders to visually assess market momentum and potential reversal points. Utilizes color-coded backgrounds to indicate Long, Short, or Neutral conditions for quick identification. Dynamic Table Display: Displays trading signals alongside graphical indicators (rocket for Long, snowflake for Short, and star for Neutral) in a customizable table format. Offers flexibility in table placement and size to accommodate user preferences. How to Use: Parameter Configuration: Adjust the length parameter to fine-tune the sensitivity of the RSI calculation based on the desired timeframe and trading strategy. Define overbought and oversold levels to identify potential reversal points in market trends. Customize upper and lower neutral thresholds to differentiate between trending and ranging market conditions. Interpretation: Monitor the aggregated MTF RSI values plotted on the price chart for signals of overbought or oversold conditions. Pay attention to color-coded backgrounds and graphical indicators in the table for actionable trading insights. Trading Strategy: Consider entering Long positions when the aggregated MTF RSI is above the upper neutral threshold, indicating potential bullish momentum. Evaluate Short opportunities when the aggregated MTF RSI falls below the lower neutral threshold, signaling possible bearish momentum. Exercise caution during Neutral conditions, as there may be uncertainty in market direction. Risk Management: Combine MTF RSI analysis with robust risk management strategies, including stop-loss and take-profit levels, to manage trading risks effectively. Practice prudent risk management and trade within your risk tolerance to minimize potential losses. Disclaimer Trading in financial markets involves risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. The use of the MTF RSI indicator does not guarantee profits or prevent losses. Traders should conduct their own analysis, exercise caution, and seek advice from qualified financial professionals before making trading decisions.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh DCAquant
Fair Value Gap█ OVERVIEW This indicator displays the Fair Value Gap of the current timeframe and an additional higher timeframe. For each FVG the gaps act as targets creating bullish and bearish gaps that are often filled. █ FEATURES MTF Options MidPoint FIll Delete Old On Fill Label FVG Timeframe MTF Options Enabling the MTF Options will allow the user to use the "MTF Timeframe" setting to choose what HTF Fair Value Gap to display MidPoint FIll A line plot at the Half way point will be included in the Fair Value Gap, this will be used to delete the gap when reached instead of a full fill. Delete Old On Fill Deletes historical Fair Value Gaps when filled. Label FVG Timeframe Labels Every Fair Value gap with there relevant timeframe to make it easier to determine which gap is being filled. █ HOW TO USE IT The indicator is quite straight forward in its application, providing users with targets that are often filled as they are seen as market imbalance. Just applying it to your chart will provide the existing Fair Value Gaps. MTF Confluence is helpful in seeing what is happening on the macro perspective. █ SUGGESTION My suggestion for clarity is to use a different color to some degree between the MTF and Current TF as Opposed to text, keeps the chart clear. █ LIMITATIONS OF PINE (Please read) I see many users going on different indicators with MTF in mind and trying to use it for LTF data e.g. 1hour chart, and selecting 5min in chart settings. This is not recommended by the team themselves and should be noted for use always use HTF: www.tradingview.com To understand how to use fair value gaps I recommend learning about the subject some more, searching online will provide you resources. The internet is your friend when learning. All the best.
Penunjuk Pine Script®
oleh spacemanbtc
102